Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Formation des professionnels de santé 2 : Objectif 1 (THP-2)

9 octobre 2026 mis à jour par: University of Minnesota

Évaluation des effets de la formation en santé reproductive sur le comportement des prestataires

The goal of this randomized, controlled, single blinded trial is to evaluate the medium to long-term effects of an Afrocentric sexual health curriculum on health professional students' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical skills in providing sexual health in Tanzania.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

All enrollees will be health students at MUHAS recruited through announcements in class, flyers on student noticeboards, and email. Students who are interested in learning more about the study can do so by asking questions of the recruiting faculty member, by going to, telephoning, or emailing the study office (at MUHAS). Students can also visit the study website. In addition, all students who contact the office will be given a copy of a flyer advertising the study and a copy of the consent documents to preview prior to participation. Students contacting the office by email will be sent electronic versions of the same documents.

Participants in Aim 1 are informed to schedule an appointment (in the month prior to the seminar) to complete a pre-evaluation. At the study site, participants complete pen and paper surveys, and are videotaped interviewing two standardized patients. Next, participants are randomized to either the intervention or waitlist control condition. Participants in the intervention will attend the 4-day sexual health seminar and complete a short post-test. In addition, at 6- and 12-month follow-up after the pre-test, participants in both arms complete surveys and two videotaped interviews (at each follow-up) and a final survey at 24-month follow-up. At the end of the study, participants assigned to the control condition can attend the seminar.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

312

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Dar es Salaam, Tanzanie
        • Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A health student studying at MUHAS and verified by being registered as a pre-final year midwifery, nursing or medical student (or its equivalent).
  • "Pre-final" year is defined as a student who is just about to enter year 3 of nursing, or year 4 of midwifery or medicine.
  • Living or studying in Tanzania
  • Experienced, operationalized as having worked at least 100 hours as a health worker in a clinic, hospital or community setting so students can discuss what happens in the clinical setting
  • Able to speak English and Kiswahili.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who will not be able to attend all days of the seminar at their health institution or be on their campus for the follow-up.
  • Students who express any reservations about attending (e.g., due to religious objections)
  • Students who express a fear of violence due to attending (e.g., from a spouse or relative).
  • Students who attended the sexual health seminar (e.g., during THP-1 or at another site). This is to prevent a student participating more than once.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Comprehensive Sexual Health Curriculum

Participants received a four-day comprehensive sexual health curriculum tailored for Africa.

This is a randomized, controlled, single blinded, trial, stratified by health profession, of the intervention versus waitlist control assessing the effects on sexual health knowledge, attitudes, and sexual history and counseling skills at medium (6-) and long-term (12 and 24 months) follow-up. At the end of the intervention as compared with waitlist controls.

The intervention was a 4-day, Afrocentric, comprehensive sexual health curriculum. Tanzanian faculty wrote the curriculum in English and Kiswahili to address the most common sexual health challenges clinicians experience in Tanzania. The 4-day curriculum covers sexual health across the lifespan, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) and sexual violence, clinical skills training, ethics, and community resources and cultural considerations.

Aucune intervention: Waitlist Control

Participants in this arm completed a follow-up survey and scheduled to receive the intervention after the end of the trial.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Sexual Health Knowledge Score
Délai: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.

Sexual health knowledge was assessed using 16 multichoice items created by the research team. The items covered female sexual health concerns (2 items), sexual development and masturbation (3 items), sexual orientation (3 items), sexual violence (3 items), sexuality in middle age (3 items), sexual history taking and sexual counseling (2 items). Total scores were used for analysis (maximum total score of 16). Participants get one point for every item answer correctly. Because there are 16 items in this section, participants can have a minimum total score of 0 and a maximum total score of 16. A higher score signifies better sexual health knowledge.

Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.
Change in Sexual Health Attitudes: Confidence in Ability to Discuss
Délai: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.

Confidence in their ability to discuss the sexual health of patients, and confidence in their ability to discuss their patients' sexual health concerns were assessed using the Sexual Health Education for Professionals Scale (SHEPS). This section consists of 37 items where participants rate their confidence from (1) very unconfident to (5) confident. Because there are 37 items in this section, participants can have a minimum total score of 37 and a maximum total score of 185. A higher value signifies better confidence in the ability to discuss sexual health topics.

Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.
Change in Sexual Health Attitudes: Confidence in Having Knowledge
Délai: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.

Confidence in their knowledge to assess the sexual health of patients, and confidence in their ability to discuss their patient's sexual health concerns were assessed using the Sexual Health Education for Professionals Scale (SHEPS). This section consists of 37 items where participants rate their confidence from (1) very unconfident to (5) confident. Because there are 37 items in this section, participants can have a minimum total score of 37 and a maximum total score of 185. A higher value signifies better confidence in having knowledge of sexual health topics.

Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.
Change in Sexual Counseling Skills: Interpersonal Communications
Délai: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.

Skills were assessed by faculty raters assessing two videos (per each time point) of student counseling blind to whether the participant was in the intervention or control group and whether the assessment was at baseline or follow-up. Each participant was rated on 10 items assessing their interpersonal communication (IC) abilities. Each item was on a 3-point scale (0=not done; 1=partially done; 2=done). The scale has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20 per video. The investigators aggregated scores for each time point by summing the two videos at each time point. Therefore, the minimum total score is 0 and the maximum total score is 40. A higher score value signifies better interpersonal communication skills.

Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.
Change in Sexual Counseling Skills: Medical History Taking
Délai: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.

Skills were assessed by faculty raters assessing the two videos (per time point) of student counseling blind to whether the participant was in the intervention or control group and whether the assessment was at baseline or follow-up. Medical history taking (MHT) was rated by six key pieces of information on a 2-point scale, where 0=not obtained information and 1=obtained information. The scale has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score or 6 per video. The investigators aggregated scores for each time point by summing the two videos at each time point. Therefore, the minimum total score is 0 and the maximum total score is 12.

Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.
Change in Sexual Health Beliefs
Délai: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.

The SHEPS Attitudes section comprises 27 items. Participants rate their level of agreement (1=strongly agree; 5=strongly disagree), with 13 items being reverse coded. Because there are 27 items in this section, participants can have a minimum total score of 27 and a maximum total score of 135. Low scores correspond to "liberal" views and high scores correspond to "conservative" views.

Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, and 24-month follow-up.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: B.R. Simon Rosser, PhD, University of Minnesota

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

28 juin 2024

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 octobre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 décembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

20 mai 2024

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

20 mai 2024

Première publication (Réel)

24 mai 2024

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

13 octobre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 octobre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 octobre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • R01HD092655 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Only group data will be analyzed.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner