Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

An Emergency Department-To-Home Intervention to Improve Quality of Life and Reduce Hospital Use

3 gennaio 2019 aggiornato da: University of Florida
The purpose of this study is to determine if assigning older, chronically ill patients a healthcare coach after they leave the Emergency Department (ED) improves their quality of life and reduces the need for hospital-based care.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Investigators will review the ED electronic medical record in real-time to determine ED patients' study eligibility. Older, chronically ill ED patients who are eligible and agree to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to a healthcare coach and Care Transition Intervention or usual, post-ED care.

At the time of enrollment, all subjects will be asked to provide informed consent for study investigators to request Medicare Claims to determine how many ED visits, hospital admissions and doctor office visits the subject had at least 30 days after the index ED visit. All research participants will be asked basic personal information such as age, race, sex, employment and marital status. All subjects will be asked to complete a baseline survey about their quality of life.

If the subject is assigned to the Care Transition Intervention, the healthcare coach will visit the subject at home within 3 days of the ED visit. The coach will talk with the subject about following up with a regular, personal doctor and symptoms that indicate a worsening health condition. The coach will help the subject understand their medicines and help the subject make a personal health record (PHR). The coach will tell the subject about the Area Agency on Aging. If the subject receives usual care, they but will be given the usual discharge instructions from the ED nurse and doctor. If the subject receives the Care Transition Intervention, the coach will also call the subject at least 3 times after the ED visit and review the same items listed above.

All enrolled subjects will be asked to complete a phone survey within 31-60 days of the ED visit. This survey will again ask subjects about their quality of life.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

1101

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, Stati Uniti, 32608
        • UF Health
      • Jacksonville, Florida, Stati Uniti, 32209
        • UF Health

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

60 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 60 years of age or older
  • Medicare beneficiaries
  • Community dwelling
  • Reside within defined geographical area (to enable home visits)
  • Have a working telephone
  • Have at least one of the following conditions documented in their electronic medical record: congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes, stroke, pneumonia, medical and surgical back conditions (predominantly spinal stenosis), hip fracture, peripheral vascular disease, cardiac arrhythmias, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, peptic ulcer disease or hemorrhage

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis of psychosis
  • Cancer
  • Dialysis
  • History of organ transplantation
  • Dementia without a live-in caregiver, or
  • In hospice care
  • Reside outside the defined geographical area
  • Reside in a skilled nursing or assisted living facility

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Terapia di supporto
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: ED-to-home care transition intervention
The ED-to-home care transition intervention is a coaching intervention. It is a 4-week program that uses an Area Agency on Aging healthcare coach to conduct a home visit and at least 3 follow-up phone calls to help patients develop the skills needed for self-management and to communicate with healthcare providers.
The Area Agency on Aging coach's role is to build self-management capabilities for the patient and their caregiver. During each contact, the coach reviews the four components of the Care Transition Intervention: 1: Follow-up Medical Visit. 2: Knowledge of Red Flag Symptoms. 3: Medication Reconciliation. 4: The Personal Health Record (PHR). The coach assists patients use the PHR to document and maintain vital information and to communicate with providers.
Altri nomi:
  • Care Transition Intervention
Sperimentale: Usual Care
Patients randomized to usual care will receive verbal and written discharge instructions from the treating ED physician and nurse as is the standard of care.
Patients randomized to usual care will receive verbal and written discharge instructions from the treating ED physician and nurse as is the standard of care.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Physical Function Between Baseline and 60 Days Post-ED Visit
Lasso di tempo: Baseline up to 60 days after index ED Visit
PROMIS Physical Function instruments measure self-reported capability. Each of 7-items in the physical function instrument used in this study has five response items ranging in value from one to five. Thus, the minimum score for the Physical Function Instrument used is 7 and the maximum score is 35. The raw score is translated to a T-score using PROMIS conversion tables. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts like Physical Function, a T-score of 60 is one SD better than average. A Physical Function T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average. Change in Physical Function is the difference between baseline and 60 day T-score.
Baseline up to 60 days after index ED Visit
Change in Anxiety Between Baseline and 60 Days Post-ED Visit
Lasso di tempo: Baseline up to 60 days after index ED Visit
PROMIS Anxiety instruments measure self-reported fear, anxious misery, and hyperarousal. Each of 8-items in the Anxiety Instrument used in this study has five response items ranging in value from one to five. Thus, the minimum score for the Anxiety Instrument used is 8 and the maximum score is 40. The raw score is translated to a T-score using PROMIS conversion tables. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For negatively-worded concepts like Anxiety, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average and an Anxiety T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.
Baseline up to 60 days after index ED Visit
Change in Informational Support Between Baseline and 60 Days Post-ED Visit
Lasso di tempo: Baseline up to 60 days after index ED Visit
PROMIS Informational Support instruments measure perceived availability of helpful information or advice. Each of 5-items in the Informational Support Instrument used in this study has five response items ranging in value from one to five. Thus, the minimum score for the Informational Support Instrument used is 5 and the maximum score is 25. The raw score is translated to a T-score using PROMIS conversion tables. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts like Informational Support, a T-score of 60 is one SD better than average and a T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average.
Baseline up to 60 days after index ED Visit
Number of Participants With Outpatient Visit Claims
Lasso di tempo: Within 30 days after index ED visit
This outcome was determined by assessing the number of participants who had one or more Medicare claims for an outpatient visit in the 30 days after the index ED visit.
Within 30 days after index ED visit
Number of Participants With ED Visit Claims
Lasso di tempo: Within 30 days after index ED visit
This outcome was determined by assessing the number of participants who had one or more Medicare claims for an ED visit in the 30 days after the index ED visit.
Within 30 days after index ED visit
Number of Participants With In-patient Admission Claims
Lasso di tempo: Within 30 days after index ED visit
This outcome was determined by assessing the number of participants who had one or more Medicare claims for a hospitalization in the 30 days after the index ED visit.
Within 30 days after index ED visit

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Donna L Carden, MD, MPH, University of Florida

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

3 maggio 2014

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

30 novembre 2015

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

10 marzo 2017

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

4 marzo 2014

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

4 marzo 2014

Primo Inserito (Stima)

6 marzo 2014

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

5 aprile 2019

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

3 gennaio 2019

Ultimo verificato

1 gennaio 2019

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • IRB201400005
  • PCORI-1306-01451 (Altro numero di sovvenzione/finanziamento: PCORI)

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su ED-to-home care transition intervention

Sottoscrivi