BI 1569912が血中のレパグリニド、ミダゾラム、ブプロピオンの量に影響を与えるかどうかを調べる健康な男性と女性を対象とした研究

Reference Treatment (R): On the morning of Day (D) 1, healthy participants received a single tablet of 0.5 milligrams (mg) of repaglinide orally. On the morning of D2, participants took a single dose of 2 mg of midazolam solution for injection orally. On the morning of D3, participants received orally a single extended-release tablet of 150 mg of bupropion. All medications were administered after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours.

Test Treatment (T): Healthy participants received in the morning, for 21 days (D-14 to D7), the intended BI 1569912 daily dose. On the morning of D1, participants took after the administration of BI 1569912, a single tablet of 0.5 mg of repaglinide orally. On the morning of D2, participants took, after the administration of BI 1569912, a single dose of 2 mg of midazolam solution for injection orally. On the morning of D3, participants received orally a single extended-release tablet of 150 mg of bupropion after BI 1569912.

No washout period occurred.

This outcome measured the area under the concentration-time curve of repaglinide in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), when administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured the area under the concentration-time curve of midazolam in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), when administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured the area under the concentration-time curve of chiral form S-bupropion in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), when bupropion was administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured the area under the concentration-time curve of total bupropion in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), when bupropion was administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured the area under the concentration-time curve of repaglinide in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz), when administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured maximum measured concentration of repaglinide in plasma (Cmax), when administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured the area under the concentration-time curve of midazolam in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz), when administered alone or co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured maximum measured concentration of midazolam in plasma (Cmax), when administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured the area under the concentration-time curve of the chiral form S-bupropion in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz), when bupropion was administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured maximum measured concentration of the chiral form S-bupropion in plasma (Cmax), when administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured the area under the concentration-time curve of total bupropion in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz), when bupropion was administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.

This outcome measured maximum measured concentration of total bupropion in plasma (Cmax), when administered alone and when co-administered at BI 1569912 steady-state.

The statistical model used was an analysis of variance (ANOVA) accounting for the following sources of variation: participant and treatment. The effect 'participant' was considered as random, whereas the effect 'treatment' was considered as fixed.