이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

The Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated With the Use of Non-pharmacological in Labor

2021년 5월 23일 업데이트: Alessandra Cristina Marcolin, University of Sao Paulo

Evaluation of Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated With the Use of Non-pharmacological in Parturients in Active Phase of Labor

Although there are studies that investigated the use of non-pharmacological pain relief and correction of dystocia during labor, there are few randomized controlled trials, especially related to combined protocols that use such resources. The use of combined protocols could potentiate the effects of resource use alone, evidencing the need for more studies related to the topic, as well as the effects of these methods on maternal and perinatal outcomes. In order to verify the effect of these methods in various stages of labor, childbirth and immediately becomes necessary to conduct a randomized controlled trial well-designed and adequate sample size that can make the future systematic reviews that can definitely conclude about the potential effectiveness of protocols that use combined resources to non-pharmacological pain relief in labor. Aim of our study is to evaluate the effects of a protocol of non-pharmacological resources on pain of pregnant women in the active phase of cervical dilatation and compared with controls.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Labor is a natural physiologic process triggered by mechanical and hormonal events that promote uterine contractions. Several non-pharmacological resources can be used during labor, such as relaxation techniques and ongoing support, maternal mobility, walking, breathing exercises, massage, Swiss ball, stool, shower, whirlpool and application of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ENT .) Despite the role of physiotherapy in labor is not an established practice in public hospitals, it is expected that with the evidence of the benefits of non-pharmacological resources at this time, managers and health professionals validate the importance of interdisciplinary care in pregnancy - postpartum. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of resources on non-pharmacological pain of mothers in the active phase of cervical dilatation when compared to controls. This research is a randomized, controlled clinical study that includes pregnant women randomly assigned to two groups: Intervention Group (IG) women who will use the following sequence features: ambulation (with cervical dilatation of 4 to 5 cm), alternating stance associated with ENT (cervical dilatation from 6 to 7 cm) and a shower (with dilation> 7 cm) for 40 minutes each resource; Control Group (CG) women who will not use any physical therapy resource, are subject only to routine procedures of maternity care . For pain assessment will use the Visual Analogue Scale - VAS and the body diagram of the location and spatial distribution of pain. Results are presented in tables and graphs made to better understand the comparisons between the control and intervention. To compare maternal morbidity, obstetric and neonatal between groups will be used Fisher's exact test or chi-square.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

80

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • São Paulo
      • Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 브라질
        • Professor, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo.

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

15년 (어린이, 성인)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

연구 대상 성별

여성

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Agreement of the patient to participate in the study after reading and signing the consent form;

    • primigravida;
    • Pregnancy unique;
    • Gestational age> 37 weeks;
    • fetal cephalic presentation;
    • chorioamniotic intact membranes;
    • spontaneous labor;
    • Admission to the beginning of the active phase of dilatation (4 cm cervical dilatation);
    • Dynamics between 2 and 4 uterine contractions in ten minutes;
    • Lack of maternal and fetal pathologies;
    • literate;
    • Absence of cognitive problems.

Exclusion Criteria:

Intolerance to non-pharmacological application of resources;

  • Increased pain by the woman that prevents the completion of the intervention;
  • Want to stop the intervention;
  • Suspected acute suffering;
  • Indication of cesarean section.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: Control
Active Comparator: Control Group Pregnant women who receive assistance from the routine CRSM MATER care, not being assisted by the physiotherapist, but that will be evaluated at the same time in the intervention group.
Other: Routine care Routine care of the institution performed by the staff, without the presence of the researcher that included offering a balanced meal, continuous support with the presence of a partner or family throughout labor, use of oxytocin when prescribed by the staff, use of drug analgesia when requested by the patient.
실험적: Intervention Group
Experimental: Intervention Group Pregnant women who receive the application the combination of non-pharmacological resources according to cervical dilation: Walking (with cervical dilation between 4 and 5 cm) Alternating stance associated with ENT (cervical dilatation from 6 to 7 cm) Shower (with dilation> 7 cm);

Other: Non-pharmacological resources

A sequence of non-pharmacological resources were applied to the patient by the researcher according to uterine cervical dilation, as follows:

  • Walking (with cervical dilation between 4 and 5 cm)
  • Alternating stance associated with ENT (cervical dilatation from 6 to 7 cm)
  • Shower (with dilation> 7 cm);

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Number of Participants Who Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Childbirth
기간: 10 hours
Average uterine cervical dilation of the patient who requested analgesia for pain relief. Data captured from the medical record by the partograph.
10 hours
The Moment in Centimeters That Women Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Childbirth, Analyzed by Cevical Dilation.
기간: 10 hours

Moment when a patient requested analgesia for pain relief. Data captured from the medical record by the partograph.

A partogram was used, which is a printed document and allows the registration of all procedures and complications that occurred during labor, showing the conditions of the parturient and the fetus during this phase. This information is noted on a graph that makes it possible to assess all labor and duration. The doctor filled out the partograph and assessed the patient during labor, and she did not know which group belonged to the patient

10 hours
Average Duration of the Expulsive Period When Compared to Groups
기간: Starts with 10 centimeters of dilation until delivery
Assess the duration of the expulsion period and compare between groups
Starts with 10 centimeters of dilation until delivery
Types of Dystocia (Functional, Secondary Stop of Dilation and Fetal Offspring) Between Groups
기간: 10 hours

Analyze and compare between the groups the types of dystocia.

Dystocia:

b.1) Functional dystocia was considered when cervical dilation increased progressively, but with a speed less than 1 centimeter per hour; b.2) Secondary stop of the dilation was considered when there were 2 vaginal touches with the same cervical dilation in an interval of at least two hours, without being total.

b.3) Secondary descent stop was considered when, with complete dilation of the uterine cervix, the same height of fetal descent was found in two successive touches with an interval of one hour (Protocol Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012).

10 hours
Admission Numbers to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Between Groups.
기간: 10 hours
Consider and compare neonatal admission to an intensive care unit between groups, attracted by the partogram
10 hours
Number of Newborns With Apgar Scores of 1 and 5 Minutes, Less Than or Greater Than 7.
기간: 10 hours

Analyze and compare Apgar scores of the 1-min >7 and 5-min >7, between groups. The APGAR score reflects the degree of fetal maturity and predicts healthy child development. It is a scale that can vary from 0 to 10, which 0 is a bad vitality and 10 is an excellent score. When the APGAR score is below 7, especially in the fifth minute, it is a warning sign to give special attention to the newborn.

Newborns who have an Apgar in the first minute greater than 7, demonstrate good birth conditions.

10 hours
Frequency of Suspected Fetal Distress, Between Groups
기간: 10 hours
Evaluate the frequency of suspected fetal distress with the presence of meconium release.
10 hours

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Moment of Rupture of the Chorioamniorex Between the Groups.
기간: 10 hours
Observe if the groups had different types of cervical obstetric dilatation when a chorioamniorexis occurred.
10 hours
Incidence in the Type of Delivery (Cesarean Section, Normal Delivery With Laceration, Episiotomy, Forceps and Normal Delivery).
기간: 10 hours
Type of delivery (cesarean section, normal delivery with laceration, episiotomy, forceps and normal delivery), collected by the partograph found in the medical record.
10 hours
Number of Puerperal Women Who Present Hemorrhage in the Immediate Puerperium With Hemodynamic Repercussions Between Groups.
기간: immediately postpartum up to 2 days after childbirth
Evaluate and compare the presence of hemorrhage with hemodynamic repercussions between groups (requiring surgical approach and / or blood transfusion)
immediately postpartum up to 2 days after childbirth
The Number of Puerperal Infections Between Groups.
기간: immediately postpartum up to 2 days after childbirth
Analyze and compare between the groups the number of puerperal infection
immediately postpartum up to 2 days after childbirth

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Alessandra C Marcolin, Professor, Faculty of Medicine of São Paulo University

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2012년 5월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2016년 1월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2016년 1월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2011년 9월 19일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2012년 5월 16일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2012년 5월 18일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 6월 9일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2021년 5월 23일

마지막으로 확인됨

2021년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • FR444841

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

Other: Routine care에 대한 임상 시험

3
구독하다