이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Physical Activity for Older Adults Chronic Low Back Pain (PACe-LBP)

2018년 9월 4일 업데이트: VA Office of Research and Development

Physical Activity for Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: PACe-LBP

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is one of the most common and disabling conditions among US military Veterans. Although physical activity can improve cLBP outcomes, the majority of Veterans with cLBP are inactive. Therefore the VA is in need of effective programs that can help older Veterans with cLBP to increase their physical activity and improve associated outcomes. This is particularly relevant for older Veterans with cLBP who are at greater risk for functional limitations. The proposed project will be a pilot study of a telephone-based physical activity program or physical activity combined with cognitive behavioral pain management for older adult Veterans with cLBP. Older Veterans are of particular interest because prior studies of physical activity for cLBP have not addressed this vulnerable patient group. This study will also inform the VA about whether certain patients with cLBP, who have greater pain sensitivity, may benefit from other treatment to supplement a physical activity program.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is one of the most common and disabling conditions among US military Veterans, and the prevalence is rising even more rapidly than other chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension. Studies have shown that physical activity (PA) can improve outcomes in patients with cLBP, but a major gap in this research is the lack of studies focusing on older adults; patient samples have been primarily middle-aged and have included few patients' age 65 years. Therefore, the investigators' lack an evidence base for the feasibility and effectiveness of PA interventions in this vulnerable group of patients with cLBP. This is particularly important given the accumulating evidence showing that older adults with cLBP have significant lower extremity functional limitations, resulting in difficulty performing necessary daily tasks. Another area of limited investigation among older adults with cLBP is whether there is added benefit of incorporating cognitive behavioral therapy for pain management (CBT-P) skills with PA interventions. CBT-P can help to restructure pain perception and improve pacing of PA. Some patients with cLBP do not respond favorably to isolated PA interventions, and it is possible that heightened pain sensitization may underlie this lack of response in some patients. Since CBT-P has been shown to alter pain processing, older adults with cLBP who have greater pain sensitization may respond better to a program that combines PA and CBT-P (vs. PA alone); however, this has not been studied. This information has practical implications for a larger trial to determining whether a subset of patients with greater central pain sensitivity may need additional intervention to supplement a PA program.

The investigators will conduct a pilot study of a 12-week home-based PA and PA + CBT-P programs, both with weekly telephone support, compared with a waiting list control group. Participants will be 60 older Veterans (age 65) with cLBP. Enrollment of participants will occur via referrals from geriatric and primary care clinics at the Durham VAMC. The PA program will be comprehensive, including stretching, strengthening, and aerobic activities, and the specific types and intensities of the activities will be geared toward older adults. The CBT-P program will include five different skills, woven into the telephone-based sessions, with specific application to PA and cLBP. Both interventions will be jointly delivered by a physical therapist and exercise counselor, who has complementary areas of expertise (e.g., training in clinical exercise prescription and motivational interviewing skills to encourage PA adherence, respectively). Telephone calls will involve patient-specific goal-setting and address barriers to PA and CBT-P skills. Participants will receive a booklet with instructions and photographs for stretching and strengthening exercises, as well as an exercise video appropriate for older adults with cLBP. Participants in the combined intervention will also receive written and audio instructions regarding CBT-P skills. Feasibility measures will include the proportion of completed intervention calls, adherence to home-based PA recommendations and CBT-P skills use, and participant feedback on the programs. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 12-week follow-up. Primary measures of efficacy will be assessments of general physical function, both objective and self-reported (PROMIS Health Assessment Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes will include measures cLBP-specific pain and disability. Central pain sensitivity will be assessed via Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) testing and the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). Statistical analyses will include comparison of baseline and follow-up outcomes across study groups, as well as examination of potential trends for differential intervention response according to baseline PPT and CSI scores.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

60

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, 미국, 27705
        • Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

65년 이상 (고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Self-report having had lower back pain on most days for greater than three months.
  2. Can complete a 10 second semi-tandem stand and walk 8' in 6.0 seconds.
  3. Report they are not satisfied with their current state of functional ability, based on reporting "dissatisfied" with at least one aspect of physical function on the Satisfaction with Physical Function Scale.
  4. Can safely participate in the intervention based upon the physical therapist baseline examination and clinical expertise.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. unilateral or bilateral sciatica that physical therapist determines could make the study intervention unsafe or inappropriate; isolated coccyx pain (based on self-report at screener);
  2. dementia or other significant cognitive impairment;
  3. movement or motor neuron disorders (e.g., Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis);
  4. rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, or other systemic rheumatic disease;
  5. hospitalization for a stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or coronary artery revascularization in the past 3 months;
  6. significant hearing impairment (must be able to talk on the telephone);
  7. psychosis or current, uncontrolled substance abuse disorder;
  8. any other health conditions determined by the study team to be contraindications to performing mild to moderate home exercises.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Physical Activity Only
12-week home-based physical activity program with telephone support. Delivered by a physical therapist and exercise counselor. Comprehensive program including stretching, strengthening and aerobic activity.
12-week home-based physical activity program with telephone support. Delivered by a physical therapist and exercise counselor. Comprehensive program including stretching, strengthening and aerobic activity.
실험적: Physical Activity + Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
12-week combined home-based physical activity and cognitive behavioral program with telephone support. Delivered by a physical therapist and exercise counselor. Comprehensive physical activity program including stretching, strengthening and aerobic activity. Cognitive behavioral component includes training in multiple skills for managing pain.
12-week home-based physical activity program with telephone support. Delivered by a physical therapist and exercise counselor. Comprehensive program including stretching, strengthening and aerobic activity.
Telephone-based training in multiple skills for managing low back pain.
간섭 없음: Wait List Control Group
Will receive the physical activity only or physical activity + cognitive behavioral therapy (based on participant choice) after completing all follow-up assessments.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Timed Get-Up-And Go
기간: Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up
This test requires the participants to stand from a standard arm chair, walk 3 meters and then return to sitting in the same chair. Greater number of seconds is associated with poorer physical function. Therefore, a positive change from baseline to follow-up means worsening function; a negative change (e.g., lower score at follow-up than at baseline) indicated improving function.
Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up
PROMIS Health Assessment Questionnaire
기간: Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up
Self-reported physical function/disability measure that captures both activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. It consists of 20-items scored on a 0-3 scale with a summed 0-100-unit scale. Higher scores are associated with worse function. Therefore a positive change score indicates worsening over time; negative change score (e.g., lower score at follow-up) indicates improvement.
Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Patient Specific Functional Scale
기간: Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up
This measure captures items that are specific functional tasks that may be missed on standardized questionnaires. The measure consists of 3 items specifically provided by the patient. Each item provided by the patient is score from a 0 (Unable to perform task) to 10 (able to complete the activity without difficulty) scale. Higher change scores from baseline to follow up indicate more improvement (total range 0-30).
Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up
Roland-Morris Disease Specific Disability Questionnaire
기간: Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up
24-item self-report measure of low back pain-specific disability. Higher scores indicate worse function, with a range of 0=no disability to 24=maximum disability measured by the scale. Therefore a positive change score indicates worsening. A negative change score (e.g., lower score at follow-up) indicates improvement.
Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up
Satisfaction With Physical Function Scale
기간: Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up
This is a validated 5-item questionnaire that assesses patients' satisfaction with their ability to complete basic functional tasks that are often affected by lower extremity OA, including stair-climbing, walking, doing housework (light and heavy, and lifting and carrying. All items are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from Very Dissatisfied (-3) Very Satisfied (+3). A positive change score indicates improvement, and a negative change score indicates worsening.
Change from baseline to 12-week follow-up

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2015년 5월 21일

기본 완료 (실제)

2016년 11월 30일

연구 완료 (실제)

2017년 3월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2014년 12월 8일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2014년 12월 22일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2014년 12월 30일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 9월 6일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2018년 9월 4일

마지막으로 확인됨

2018년 9월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • E1569-P

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

미국에서 제조되어 미국에서 수출되는 제품

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

하부 요통에 대한 임상 시험

Physical Activity에 대한 임상 시험

3
구독하다