Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Gerandomiseerde klinische studie van MARI (MARI)

15 september 2026 bijgewerkt door: VA Office of Research and Development

Een gerandomiseerde gecontroleerde studie van de mobiele woedereductie-interventie voor veteranen

Difficulty controlling anger is the most commonly reported reintegration concern among combat Veterans, especially those with a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Problematic anger is associated with significant functional impairment. In the current project, the investigators will compare the Mobile Anger Reduction Intervention (MARI) with a health education mobile intervention (HED) among Veterans with PTSD and problematic anger. Participants will be randomized to the MARI or HED condition. The hypothesis is that participants in the MARI condition will experience greater anger reductions and functional improvements relative to the HED condition.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Werving

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Difficulty controlling anger is the most commonly reported reintegration concern among combat Veterans, especially those with a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In Veterans, problematic anger is associated with numerous negative psychosocial outcomes, including poor functional outcomes (both social and occupational), family discord, aggression, road rage, and suicide risk. Anger can also impede successful outcomes from PTSD treatment. Given the high prevalence of anger problems among Veterans with PTSD and the associated functional impairments, there is a clear need to develop innovative and effective anger interventions to improve functional outcomes. Use of mobile health (mHealth) technology could provide a low-cost method to increase the reach of anger management treatments to this high-need group of Veterans.

One of the mechanisms associated with problematic anger and aggression is hostile interpretation bias, i.e., a tendency to interpret ambiguous interpersonal situations as hostile. By reducing hostile interpretation bias, the investigators can reduce problematic anger and aggression and improve functional outcomes. A mobile application that uses evidence-based interpretation bias modification techniques to reduce hostile interpretation bias and anger outcomes has been developed and piloted. The goal of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of this mobile application among Veterans with PTSD.

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted, in which 150 Veterans with PTSD and problematic anger will be randomized to either the Mobile Anger Reduction Intervention (MARI) or a health education condition (HED). The central hypothesis is that participants in the MARI condition will experience greater anger reductions and functional improvements relative to the HED condition.

The proposed research project will address the following Specific Aims: Aim 1: To evaluate the efficacy of MARI on anger outcomes (e.g., hostile interpretation bias, problematic anger) measured at post-treatment, 3-months, and 6-months post treatment; Aim 2: To evaluate the efficacy of MARI on functional improvements (i.e., psychosocial functioning, quality of life) and self-harm measured at post-treatment, 3-months, and 6-months post treatment; and Exploratory Aim: To explore whether changes in hostile interpretation bias (proposed treatment mechanism) mediate functional improvements.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Geschat)

150

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

Studie Contact Back-up

Studie Locaties

  • Verenigde Staten
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, Verenigde Staten, 27705-3875
        • Werving
        • Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
        • Contact:
        • Hoofdonderzoeker:
          • Kirsten H Dillon, PhD

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Kind
  • Volwassen
  • Oudere volwassene

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans diagnosed with Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), established via chart review and a score of greater than or equal to 33 on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
  • Reporting a score of greater than or equal to 12 on the 5-item Dimensions of Anger Reactions Scale
  • Have not had any changes to type or dose of psychiatric medications for 3 months, with no plans to make adjustments in the next 6 months
  • Able to read at least 6th grade level material

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently in a period of active psychosis or mania
  • Exhibit current prominent suicidal or homicidal ideation requiring immediate intervention
  • Have used the Mobile Anger Reduction Intervention (MARI) application before as part of another research study
  • Receiving (or plan to receive) other anger management psychotherapy or trauma-focused therapy for PTSD (i.e., prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy during the course of the study

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Dubbele

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Mobile Anger Reduction Intervention (MARI)

Participants in this arm will download the MARI application (app) on their own smart phone device and will use the app for a period of 4 weeks.
Gedragsmatig: Mobile Anger Reduction Intervention (MARI)

This is a mobile intervention that uses interpretation bias modification (IBM) techniques to reduce the hostile interpretation bias. Participants will download the MARI app and be instructed to complete at least 5 treatment sessions each week for a period of 4 weeks. Each session takes approximately 10 minutes. The app also includes a Nightly Diary to track symptoms, a calendar to program session reminders, and a My Progress feature to track use and performance.
Actieve vergelijker: Health Education Condition (HED)

Participants in this arm will download the HED application (app) on their own smart phone device and will use the app for a period of 4 weeks.
Gedragsmatig: Health Education Condition (HED)

This is a mobile application that delivers videos with psychoeducation about healthy habits and selfcare for general wellness. Participants will download the HED app and be instructed to use it at least 5 times a week for a period of 4 weeks.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
number of participants below the clinical cut off for problematic anger
Tijdsspanne: Post-treatment (approx. one month after baseline assessment)

Measured with the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 scale; scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating higher levels of problematic anger; the clinical cut off is 12. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a score lower than 12.
Post-treatment (approx. one month after baseline assessment)
number of participants below the clinical cut off for problematic anger
Tijdsspanne: 6-month follow-up

Measured with the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 scale; scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating higher levels of problematic anger; the clinical cut off is 12. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a score lower than 12.
6-month follow-up
number of participants below the clinical cut off for problematic anger
Tijdsspanne: 3-month follow-up

Measured with the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 scale; scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating higher levels of problematic anger; the clinical cut off is 12. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a score lower than 12.
3-month follow-up
number of participants with decreased hostile interpretation bias scores
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to post-treatment assessments (approx. one month after baseline assessment)

Measured with the Word Sentence Association Paradigm-Hostility, hostility subscale. Scores range from 1-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels hostile interpretation bias. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a reduction in scores within the time frame.
from baseline to post-treatment assessments (approx. one month after baseline assessment)
number of participants with decreased hostile interpretation bias scores
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to 3-month follow-up

Measured with the Word Sentence Association Paradigm-Hostility, hostility subscale. Scores range from 1-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels hostile interpretation bias. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a reduction in scores within the time frame.
from baseline to 3-month follow-up
number of participants with decreased hostile interpretation bias scores
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to 6-month follow-up

Measured with the Word Sentence Association Paradigm-Hostility, hostility subscale. Scores range from 1-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels hostile interpretation bias. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a reduction in scores within the time frame.
from baseline to 6-month follow-up

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
number of participants with decreased psychosocial impairment scores
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to post-treatment assessments (approx. one month after baseline assessment)

Measured with the Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning. Scores range from 0-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychosocial impairment. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a reduction of scores within the time frame.
from baseline to post-treatment assessments (approx. one month after baseline assessment)
number of participants with decreased psychosocial impairment scores
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to 3-month follow-up

Measured with the Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning. Scores range from 0-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychosocial impairment. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a reduction of scores within the time frame.
from baseline to 3-month follow-up
number of participants with decreased psychosocial impairment scores
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to 6-month follow-up

Measured with the Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning. Scores range from 0-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychosocial impairment. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a reduction of scores within the time frame.
from baseline to 6-month follow-up
number of participants with improved quality of life
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to post-treatment assessments (approx. one month after baseline assessment)

Measured with the Quality of Life Inventory. Scores range from -6-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction with life. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have an increase in their score within the time frame.
from baseline to post-treatment assessments (approx. one month after baseline assessment)
number of participants with improved quality of life
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to 3-month follow-up

Measured with the Quality of Life Inventory. Scores range from -6-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction with life. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have an increase in their score within the time frame.
from baseline to 3-month follow-up
number of participants with improved quality of life
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to 6-month follow-up

Measured with the Quality of Life Inventory. Scores range from -6-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction with life. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have an increase in their score within the time frame.
from baseline to 6-month follow-up
number of participants with reduced suicidal ideation
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to post-treatment assessments (approx. one month after baseline assessment)

Measured with the Columbia- Suicide Severity Rating Scale, suicidal ideation intensity rating. Scores range from 0-25, with higher scores indicating higher intensity of suicidal ideation. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a decrease in their score within the time frame.
from baseline to post-treatment assessments (approx. one month after baseline assessment)
number of participants with reduced suicidal ideation
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to 3-month follow-up

Measured with the Columbia- Suicide Severity Rating Scale, suicidal ideation intensity rating. Scores range from 0-25, with higher scores indicating higher intensity of suicidal ideation. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a decrease in their score within the time frame.
from baseline to 3-month follow-up
number of participants with reduced suicidal ideation
Tijdsspanne: from baseline to 6-month follow-up

Measured with the Columbia- Suicide Severity Rating Scale, suicidal ideation intensity rating. Scores range from 0-25, with higher scores indicating higher intensity of suicidal ideation. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a decrease in their score within the time frame.
from baseline to 6-month follow-up

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Kirsten H Dillon, PhD, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

12 november 2024

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

30 oktober 2027

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

31 maart 2028

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

16 oktober 2023

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

16 oktober 2023

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

23 oktober 2023

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

21 september 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

15 september 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 september 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • D4561-R

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

product vervaardigd in en geëxporteerd uit de V.S.

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren