Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Does Use of Ultrasound Reduce the Rate of Sham Caudal Block in Children

20. februar 2020 oppdatert av: Adam Adler MD, MS, FAAP, Baylor College of Medicine
Caudal blocks are one of the most commonly performed regional anesthetics in children and are performed daily for a host of infra-umbilical surgical procedures. A caudal block is an epidural injection, most commonly of local anesthetic into the epidural space as accessed via the sacral hiatus. In children, the sacral hiatus is a normally occurring aperture in which the epidural space may be accessed with extremely minimal risk; as neural tissue ends more proximally. Due to this measure of safety, caudal blocks are preferred in children when compared with standard lumbar epidurals. Caudal blocks are performed blindly using palpation and tactile feedback to assess if the medication is being administered in the correct location. As a result of blind injection, administration of local anesthetic totally or partially outside of the correct site can often be unnoticed or identified after a significant volume has already been injected. With the potential for toxicity of local anesthetic, this may result in either the inability to give a complete dose or an unintentional and often unnoticed sham block "incorrect site of injection".

Studieoversikt

Status

Tilbaketrukket

Detaljert beskrivelse

Caudal blocks are one of the most commonly performed regional anesthetics in children and are performed daily for a host of infra-umbilical surgical procedures. A caudal block is an epidural injection, most commonly of local anesthetic into the epidural space as accessed via the sacral hiatus. In children, the sacral hiatus is a normally occurring aperture in which the epidural space may be accessed with extremely minimal risk; as neural tissue ends more proximally. Due to this measure of safety, caudal blocks are preferred in children when compared with standard lumbar epidurals. Caudal blocks are performed blindly using palpation and tactile feedback to assess if the medication is being administered in the correct location. As a result of blind injection, administration of local anesthetic totally or partially outside of the correct site can often be unnoticed or identified after a significant volume has already been injected. With the potential for toxicity of local anesthetic, this may result in either the inability to give a complete dose or an unintentional and often unnoticed sham block "incorrect site of injection".

Use of ultrasound has been proposed for identification of caudal block placement and correct medication spread. However, a recent review of the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network database reveals that ultrasound is reportedly only used in less that 3% of blocks. The benefit of ultrasound is safe and real-time confirmation of injection. Ultrasound allows the provider to determine with minimal local anesthetic or even saline injection if the correct space is accessed. Without ultrasound, failed blocks are either identified after significant percentage of the total dose of local anesthetic is incorrectly administered or intra or post operatively when the patient demonstrates a significant opioid requirement. This is problematic given that one of the primary benefits of a caudal block in children is the ability to avoid opioids.

Review of local practice here at Texas Children's Hospital for quality improvement purposes revealed a failure rate of caudal blocks to be 18%. Failure was defined as a heart rate increase with incision of >20% despite a caudal block and >1MAC of gas for the patient age. These patients all required opioids both intra and post operatively in addition to surgical levels of inhaled anesthetic agent.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, Forente stater, 77030
        • Texas Childrens Hospital

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

Ikke eldre enn 7 år (Barn)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children ages 0-84 months
  • Infra-umbilical procedure for which a caudal block is already planned
  • American Society of Anesthesiology classifications of 1,2 or 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incarcerated hernias
  • Emergency procedures
  • Local Anesthetic allergy
  • Sacral dimple
  • Rash over sacrum
  • Parents/legal guardians unable to consent for surgical procedure in English language Foster Care/Child protective services as guardians
  • Parental Refusal for caudal block or study participation
  • American Society of Anesthesiology classifications other than 1,2 or 3

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Enkeltgruppeoppdrag
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Ultrasound

The attending anesthesiologist will perform or instruct the placement of a caudal block according to their standard of practice. At the time of administration of local anesthetic into the caudal space, the study collaborator (SC) will ultrasound the caudal space keeping the provider placing the block blinded to the imaging. The provider placing the block will inject 0.5mL of saline. The provider will then be asked to state if they are correctly in the caudal space or not. If the provider feels they are not in the caudal space, they will re-do the procedure. If the provider fails to identify incorrect location and this is noted by ultrasound, the SC will inform the provider to re-do the procedure.

All study participants will have ultrasound used for caudal block.

The attending anesthesiologist will perform or instruct the placement of a caudal block according to their standard of practice. At the time of administration of local anesthetic into the caudal space, the study collaborator (SC) will ultrasound the caudal space keeping the provider placing the block blinded to the imaging. The provider placing the block will inject 0.5mL of preservative free saline. The provider will then be asked to state if they are correctly in the caudal space or not. If the provider feels they are not in the caudal space, they will re-do the procedure. If the provider fails to identify incorrect location and this is noted by ultrasound, the SC will inform the provider to re-do the procedure

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Identify the rate at which blindly placed caudal blocks are not within the epidural space
Tidsramme: 15 minutes
Assess the percentage of providers not recognizing wrong site of injection without ultrasound
15 minutes

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Identify the rate at which ultrasound can guide a wrong block into the correct location
Tidsramme: 15 minutes
Assess the number of blocks that are require the use of ultrasound to redirect needle into caudal space
15 minutes
Identify if lack of heart rate change on incision can predict successful placement when medication administration is successfully confirmed with ultrasound
Tidsramme: 15 minutes
With ultrasound identification of correct caudal injection, (successful block), does lack of heart rate change correlated with successful block
15 minutes
Identify if after using ultrasound to visualize placement, if concentrations of inhaled agents may be reduced in children
Tidsramme: 30 minutes to 3 hours
With demonstration of successful caudal injection, can inhaled agent concentration be reduced as calculated by MAC hours
30 minutes to 3 hours

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Adam C Adler, MD, FAAP, Texas Childrens Hospital

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

30. juni 2017

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

30. oktober 2017

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

30. oktober 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

12. september 2017

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

13. september 2017

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

14. september 2017

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

24. februar 2020

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

20. februar 2020

Sist bekreftet

1. februar 2020

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • H-40844

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Ja

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Kliniske studier på Regional anestesisykelighet

Kliniske studier på Ultrasound guidance for caudal block

Abonnere