Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Does Use of Ultrasound Reduce the Rate of Sham Caudal Block in Children

20 februari 2020 uppdaterad av: Adam Adler MD, MS, FAAP, Baylor College of Medicine
Caudal blocks are one of the most commonly performed regional anesthetics in children and are performed daily for a host of infra-umbilical surgical procedures. A caudal block is an epidural injection, most commonly of local anesthetic into the epidural space as accessed via the sacral hiatus. In children, the sacral hiatus is a normally occurring aperture in which the epidural space may be accessed with extremely minimal risk; as neural tissue ends more proximally. Due to this measure of safety, caudal blocks are preferred in children when compared with standard lumbar epidurals. Caudal blocks are performed blindly using palpation and tactile feedback to assess if the medication is being administered in the correct location. As a result of blind injection, administration of local anesthetic totally or partially outside of the correct site can often be unnoticed or identified after a significant volume has already been injected. With the potential for toxicity of local anesthetic, this may result in either the inability to give a complete dose or an unintentional and often unnoticed sham block "incorrect site of injection".

Studieöversikt

Detaljerad beskrivning

Caudal blocks are one of the most commonly performed regional anesthetics in children and are performed daily for a host of infra-umbilical surgical procedures. A caudal block is an epidural injection, most commonly of local anesthetic into the epidural space as accessed via the sacral hiatus. In children, the sacral hiatus is a normally occurring aperture in which the epidural space may be accessed with extremely minimal risk; as neural tissue ends more proximally. Due to this measure of safety, caudal blocks are preferred in children when compared with standard lumbar epidurals. Caudal blocks are performed blindly using palpation and tactile feedback to assess if the medication is being administered in the correct location. As a result of blind injection, administration of local anesthetic totally or partially outside of the correct site can often be unnoticed or identified after a significant volume has already been injected. With the potential for toxicity of local anesthetic, this may result in either the inability to give a complete dose or an unintentional and often unnoticed sham block "incorrect site of injection".

Use of ultrasound has been proposed for identification of caudal block placement and correct medication spread. However, a recent review of the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network database reveals that ultrasound is reportedly only used in less that 3% of blocks. The benefit of ultrasound is safe and real-time confirmation of injection. Ultrasound allows the provider to determine with minimal local anesthetic or even saline injection if the correct space is accessed. Without ultrasound, failed blocks are either identified after significant percentage of the total dose of local anesthetic is incorrectly administered or intra or post operatively when the patient demonstrates a significant opioid requirement. This is problematic given that one of the primary benefits of a caudal block in children is the ability to avoid opioids.

Review of local practice here at Texas Children's Hospital for quality improvement purposes revealed a failure rate of caudal blocks to be 18%. Failure was defined as a heart rate increase with incision of >20% despite a caudal block and >1MAC of gas for the patient age. These patients all required opioids both intra and post operatively in addition to surgical levels of inhaled anesthetic agent.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, Förenta staterna, 77030
        • Texas Childrens Hospital

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

Inte äldre än 7 år (Barn)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children ages 0-84 months
  • Infra-umbilical procedure for which a caudal block is already planned
  • American Society of Anesthesiology classifications of 1,2 or 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incarcerated hernias
  • Emergency procedures
  • Local Anesthetic allergy
  • Sacral dimple
  • Rash over sacrum
  • Parents/legal guardians unable to consent for surgical procedure in English language Foster Care/Child protective services as guardians
  • Parental Refusal for caudal block or study participation
  • American Society of Anesthesiology classifications other than 1,2 or 3

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: N/A
  • Interventionsmodell: Enskild gruppuppgift
  • Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Experimentell: Ultrasound

The attending anesthesiologist will perform or instruct the placement of a caudal block according to their standard of practice. At the time of administration of local anesthetic into the caudal space, the study collaborator (SC) will ultrasound the caudal space keeping the provider placing the block blinded to the imaging. The provider placing the block will inject 0.5mL of saline. The provider will then be asked to state if they are correctly in the caudal space or not. If the provider feels they are not in the caudal space, they will re-do the procedure. If the provider fails to identify incorrect location and this is noted by ultrasound, the SC will inform the provider to re-do the procedure.

All study participants will have ultrasound used for caudal block.

The attending anesthesiologist will perform or instruct the placement of a caudal block according to their standard of practice. At the time of administration of local anesthetic into the caudal space, the study collaborator (SC) will ultrasound the caudal space keeping the provider placing the block blinded to the imaging. The provider placing the block will inject 0.5mL of preservative free saline. The provider will then be asked to state if they are correctly in the caudal space or not. If the provider feels they are not in the caudal space, they will re-do the procedure. If the provider fails to identify incorrect location and this is noted by ultrasound, the SC will inform the provider to re-do the procedure

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Identify the rate at which blindly placed caudal blocks are not within the epidural space
Tidsram: 15 minutes
Assess the percentage of providers not recognizing wrong site of injection without ultrasound
15 minutes

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Identify the rate at which ultrasound can guide a wrong block into the correct location
Tidsram: 15 minutes
Assess the number of blocks that are require the use of ultrasound to redirect needle into caudal space
15 minutes
Identify if lack of heart rate change on incision can predict successful placement when medication administration is successfully confirmed with ultrasound
Tidsram: 15 minutes
With ultrasound identification of correct caudal injection, (successful block), does lack of heart rate change correlated with successful block
15 minutes
Identify if after using ultrasound to visualize placement, if concentrations of inhaled agents may be reduced in children
Tidsram: 30 minutes to 3 hours
With demonstration of successful caudal injection, can inhaled agent concentration be reduced as calculated by MAC hours
30 minutes to 3 hours

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Adam C Adler, MD, FAAP, Texas Childrens Hospital

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

30 juni 2017

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

30 oktober 2017

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

30 oktober 2017

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

12 september 2017

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

13 september 2017

Första postat (Faktisk)

14 september 2017

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

24 februari 2020

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

20 februari 2020

Senast verifierad

1 februari 2020

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • H-40844

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

NEJ

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Ja

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Kliniska prövningar på Sjuklighet i regional anestesi

Kliniska prövningar på Ultrasound guidance for caudal block

Prenumerera