- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT03320148
Determining the Impact of a New Physiotherapist Led Primary Care Model for Back Pain
21. mars 2019 oppdatert av: Jordan Miller, PT, PhD, Queen's University
Determining the Impact of a New Physiotherapist Led Primary Care Model for Back Pain: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
This is a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility of a cluster randomized trial to evaluate the individual and health system impact of implementing a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for back pain in Canada.
Studieoversikt
Status
Fullført
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
This study aims to determine the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomized trial in primary care settings in Ontario to evaluate the individual health outcomes and health system impact of implementing a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for people with back pain.
The primary purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility including recruitment and retention of primary care teams (sites) and patient participants, carrying out the assessment procedures, and implementing the physiotherapist-led primary care intervention including training the physiotherapist to adopt this role.
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Faktiske)
100
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
Ontario
-
Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6
- Queen's University
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults (18 years and over) with back pain of any duration
- Seeking primary care for back pain at a participating site
- Primary care visit may be a first or repeat visit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who do not consent to participation
- Patients who report being unable to understand, read, and write English
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Helsetjenesteforskning
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Fysioterapeutledet primæromsorgsmodell for ryggsmerter
Den PT-ledede primæromsorgsmodellen for ryggsmerter vil innebære å inkludere en PT i primærhelseteamet ved første kontaktpunkt for personer med ryggsmerter uten kostnad for pasienten.
Pasienter i denne modellen vil få valget mellom å oppsøke PT eller fastlege.
De vil bli oppfordret til å bestille hos PT, bortsett fra når den primære årsaken til besøket er fornyelse av medisiner eller når pasienten har ytterligere helseproblemer som trenger oppmerksomhet fra legen i samme besøk.
Det vil være 4 nøkkelkomponenter i den PT-ledede primærhelseintervensjonen: 1) Innledende vurdering og screening; 2) Kort individualisert intervensjon ved første besøk; 3) Helsetjenester navigasjon; 4) Ytelse av ytterligere PT-omsorg for personer med et udekket behov.
|
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Usual care
The physician led primary care intervention will be unstandardized to best reflect standard clinical practice in Canada.
This usually includes a visit to a primary care physician, who would perform a history and physical examination, provide LBP education, and prescribe medications and/or refer based on their assessment findings and patient preferences.
|
The physician led primary care intervention will be unstandardized to best reflect standard clinical practice in Canada.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment of primary care teams
Tidsramme: Baseline
|
Ability to recruit four primary care teams (Family Health Teams or Community Health Centres) to paricipate
|
Baseline
|
|
Recruitment of patient participants
Tidsramme: Baseline to 14 weeks
|
Recruitment rate (participants/week) or total number of participants recruited in 14 weeks
|
Baseline to 14 weeks
|
|
Assessment completion
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week 12-week, 6,9,12 month follow-up. The primary time point for this assessment is 12-week follow-up.
|
Percentage of all assessment items completed by participants completing each assessment
|
Baseline, 6-week 12-week, 6,9,12 month follow-up. The primary time point for this assessment is 12-week follow-up.
|
|
Retention of patient participants
Tidsramme: Retention of participants at 6-week, 12-week, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-up assessments. The primary timeline for this outcome is 12-month follow-up.
|
Attrition rate
|
Retention of participants at 6-week, 12-week, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-up assessments. The primary timeline for this outcome is 12-month follow-up.
|
|
Physiotherapist confidence in carrying out the interventions
Tidsramme: Baseline
|
The PT will rate his/her confidence in each component of the intervention after the training on a scale from 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater confidence in carrying out that component of the intervention.
|
Baseline
|
|
Treatment fidelity
Tidsramme: 6-week follow-up
|
Treatment fidelity will be measured by consistency with the intervention described in the protocol measured through an intervention checklist completed by the physiotherapist and an audit of the EMR notes.
|
6-week follow-up
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported disability
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
measured using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater disability)
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Self-reported pain intensity
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
measured using a numeric pain rating scale from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity (measured at rest, during walking, and during a lifting task)
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Health Related Quality of Life
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
measured using the EuroQoL-5D-5L (0 to 100 with greater scores indicating greater self-reported health related quality of life)
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Global rating of change
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
measured using an 11-point scale (-5 to +5 with negative scores indicating a worsening of physical functioning related to back pain and positive scores indicating an improvement of physical functioning related to back pain)
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Satisfaction with health care
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
measured using an 11-point scale(-5 to +5 with negative scores indicating a dissatisfaction with health care received and positive scores indicating satisfaction with health care received)
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Catastrophic Thinking
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (0 to 52 with higher scores indicating greater catastrophic thinking)
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Depressive symptoms
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (0 to 27 with greater scores indicating increased depressive symptoms)
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Adverse events
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
measured using an adverse events questionnaire that asks 1) if the patient has experienced any adverse events as a result of the treatments received (yes/no); 2) how long the event lasted (hours or days); 3) how severe the adverse event was (0-10 scale); 4) what adverse events were experienced.
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Health care accessibility
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
Percentage of patients receiving care within 48 hours.
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Health care accessibility
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
Percentage of patients who score medium or high risk on the STarT Back tool who receive physiotherapy care.
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Health care utilization
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
All health care visits (aggregated and dis-aggregated) including: primary care visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, surgeries, consultations with other health care providers, diagnostic imaging, medications, and other care received by the patient
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Costs (piloted for a cost utility analysis in a future trial)
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
Includes all health care costs plus societal costs using a human capital approach for loss of productivity
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Medications prescribed
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
Measured as a process outcome
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Diagnostic imaging ordered
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
Measured as a process outcome
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
referrals to other health care providers made
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
Measured as a process outcome
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
notes made by primary care provider to employers or insurers
Tidsramme: Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
Measured as a process outcome
|
Baseline, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Samarbeidspartnere
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Jordan Miller, PhD, Queen's University
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
20. september 2017
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
15. januar 2019
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
15. januar 2019
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
16. oktober 2017
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
24. oktober 2017
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
25. oktober 2017
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
25. mars 2019
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
21. mars 2019
Sist bekreftet
1. mars 2019
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 6021536
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
NEI
IPD-planbeskrivelse
There is no plan to share individual participant data from this pilot study.
This data will be used to inform the protocol for a fully powered cluster randomized trial.
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .
Kliniske studier på Ryggsmerte
-
Bozok UniversityFullført
-
Health Services Academy, Islamabad, PakistanUkjentmHelse | Gjeninnleggelse | Teach-back kommunikasjonPakistan
-
Rush University Medical CenterFullførtPasientutdanning | Teach-back kommunikasjon | Etter besøksinstruksjoner | PasientforståelseForente stater
-
Medical College of WisconsinChildren's WisconsinAktiv, ikke rekrutterendeSimulering av fysisk sykdom | Trakeostomikomplikasjon | Teach-back kommunikasjonForente stater
-
Marmara UniversityFullførtTeach-back kommunikasjonTyrkia (Türkiye)
-
University of ValenciaFullført
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaRekrutteringPatellofemoral Pain, PFPTyrkia (Türkiye)
-
Beijing Sport UniversityHar ikke rekruttert ennåPatellofemoral Pain, PFP
-
Beijing Sport UniversityHar ikke rekruttert ennå
-
Future University in EgyptFullført