Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

PENG vs. FIC-blokk for hoftebrudd ED-pasienter

21. september 2026 oppdatert av: Antonios Likourezos

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) blokk vs. Fascia Iliaca Compartment (FIC) blokk for pasienter med isolerte hoftebrudd i akuttmottaket

Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are an important tool for treating pain due to orthopedic injury in the ED. They provide long lasting, opioid-sparing pain relief that is generally safe and well-tolerated by patients1. Elderly patients with hip fractures commonly present to the ED, and their injury can be painful. Commonly used opioid pain regimens can have deleterious side effects, especially in elderly patients, like somnolence, delirium, hypotension and respiratory depression.

The fascia iliaca compartment (FIC) block has become a familiar technique to emergency physicians as a pain control treatment for hip fractures. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has recently been proposed as a novel method to treat pain due to hip, acetabular and pelvic fracture by targeting the terminal sensory articular nerve branches of the femoral nerve (FN), obturator nerve (ON), and accessory obturator nerve (AON). At this time there has been no study comparing the efficacy of the two nerve blocks, PENG and FIC.

This aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the PENG block (20mL of Bupivacaine 0.50%) to that of the FIC block (40mL of Bupivacaine 0.25%) for patients with hip fractures in the ED. Our hypothesis is that PENG will demonstrate analgesia that is non-inferior to FIC. Subjective pain scores on a scale of 0 to 10 will be assessed before and after the block. All subjects will receive 4mg of morphine after consent and prior to the block.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are an important tool for treating pain due to orthopedic injury in the ED. They provide long lasting, opioid-sparing pain relief that is generally safe and well-tolerated by patients1. Elderly patients with hip fractures commonly present to the ED, and their injury can be painful. Commonly used opioid pain regimens can have deleterious side effects, especially in elderly patients, like somnolence, delirium, hypotension and respiratory depression.

The fascia iliaca compartment (FIC) block has become a familiar technique to emergency physicians as a pain control treatment for hip fractures. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has recently been proposed as a novel method to treat pain due to hip, acetabular and pelvic fracture by targeting the terminal sensory articular nerve branches of the femoral nerve (FN), obturator nerve (ON), and accessory obturator nerve (AON). At this time there has been no study comparing the efficacy of the two nerve blocks, PENG and FIC.

This aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the PENG block (20mL of Bupivacaine 0.50%) to that of the FIC block (40mL of Bupivacaine 0.25%) for patients with hip fractures in the ED. Our hypothesis is that PENG will demonstrate analgesia that is non-inferior to FIC. Subjective pain scores on a scale of 0 to 10 will be assessed before and after the block. All subjects will receive 4mg of morphine after consent and prior to the block.

A secondary aim is to show that the PENG block is preferable to the FIC block because it does not target motor nerves, thus preserving motor function allowing for an accurate neurological exam and hopefully providing for earlier ambulation. Also, we aim to determine if PENG block results in an significant reduction in amount of systemic pain medication needed for the patient.

This is a single-centered, prospective, randomized, blinded study involving patients who present to the ED with an isolated hip fracture. Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be consented for the study and then randomized to receive either a FIC block or a PENG block. Patients who are potentially to be enrolled in the study will receive standardized systemic analgesia while awaiting x-rays. If needed, patients will be administered morphine for breakthrough pain after the nerve blocks are placed. The exception to this standardization will be patients with a morphine allergy.

The research associate will screen for patients and confirm with the attending physician that the subject is eligible for enrollment and is able to give consent. The patient consented by a member of the research team, who will assess the patient's pain score on a scale of 0 to 10 prior to the block. The patient will then be randomized to receive either the FIC block or the PENG block to be performed by a member of the ultrasound faculty. The research associate will be blinded to the type of block being performed by the ultrasound faculty member. The research associate will then reassess the patient's pain score on the 0-10 scale at the 30 minute and 60-minute mark. They will also assess for any adverse events after the block is performed. The research associate will note the motor function in the quadriceps muscle 30 min and 60 min after the nerve block is placed. Any rescue medication given after the nerve block is placed in the ED will be recorded.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

50

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, Forente stater, 11209
        • Maimonides Medical Center

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år til 110 år (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult Emergency Medicine Patients over 18 years of age
  • Isolated hip fracture, intertrocanteric or more proximal
  • Pain score 5 or greater on a scale of 0 to 10 just prior to nerve block placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with multi-system trauma
  • People who are unable to communicate their level of pain\
  • Pregnant patients
  • Pediatric Patients (less than 18 years of age)
  • Intoxicated Patients
  • Abnormal Vital Signs (HR>120bpm, MAP <65, Pulse Ox <95%)
  • Patients on long term systemic opioid analgesia
  • Allergy to amide local anesthetics

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Dobbelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Fascia Iliaca Compartment

Fascial Iliaca block (FIC) (40mL of Bupivacaine 0.25%) for patients with hip fractures in the ED

Ultrasound Guided Nerve Block for Hip Fracture Patients using the FIC Proceedure

Aktiv komparator: PENG Block

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block (20mL of Bupivacaine 0.50%)

Ultrasound Guided Nerve Block for Hip Fractures Patients using the PENG Procedure

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pain Score at 30 Minutes
Tidsramme: 30 minutes post administration of nerve block

The pain score at 11 point Likert Scale ranging 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain) at 30 minutes post nerve block procedure

30 minutes post administration of nerve block

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pain Score at 60 minutes
Tidsramme: 60 minutes post administration of nerve block

The pain score at 11 point Likert Scale ranging 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain) at 60 minutes post nerve block procedure

60 minutes post administration of nerve block

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Lawrence Haines, MD, Maimonides Medical Center

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

20. oktober 2021

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

31. mai 2026

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

21. juni 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

20. oktober 2021

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

20. oktober 2021

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

2. november 2021

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

24. september 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

21. september 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. september 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere