Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Decision Support Tool for Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer (COAST)

3. juni 2026 oppdatert av: Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Communicating Options for Advanced Breast Cancer Support and Treatment (COAST)

The goal of this pilot study is to understand and improve the shared decision-making process between people with advanced breast cancer and their providers regarding their care and treatment. As part of this study, the researchers will evaluate a decision support tool called COAST that was designed to support patients and providers in having meaningful conversations. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Can the COAST tool improve the quality of communication between patients and their oncology providers?
  2. Is the COAST tool acceptable, appropriate, and easy to use at NYP-Weill Cornell Medicine, NYP-Brooklyn Methodist Hospital and NYP-Queens?

Participants will be asked to fill out two surveys: one before they use the COAST tool and another about 2 - 4 weeks later. Some patients will also be invited for an interview.

Studieoversikt

Status

Har ikke rekruttert ennå

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

100

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Studer Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

  • Forente stater
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, Forente stater, 11215
        • NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
        • Ta kontakt med:
        • Hovedetterforsker:
          • Evelyn Taiwo, MD
      • New York, New York, Forente stater, 10065
        • NewYork-Presbyterian David H. Koch Center
        • Hovedetterforsker:
          • Shoshana Rosenberg, ScD, MPH
        • Ta kontakt med:
      • New York, New York, Forente stater, 11355
        • NewYork-Presbyterian Medical Group Queens
        • Ta kontakt med:
        • Hovedetterforsker:
          • Pooja Murthy, MD

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female 18 years and older
  • Diagnosis of Stage IV breast cancer
  • English, Spanish or Mandarin speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Early breast cancer
  • Individuals speaking languages other than English, Spanish, or Mandarin as their primary language

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Støttende omsorg
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Enkeltgruppeoppdrag
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: COAST intervention
Atferdsmessig: Decision Support Tool
The COAST decision support tool will be available in two formats: a booklet and a website. It will provide information about advanced breast cancer and the available treatment options. Participants will be guided through questions designed to clarify their goals and preferences, identify support needs, and concerns they may have.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Patient-reported acceptability of the COAST decision support tool
Tidsramme: 2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST

The proportion of patients who agree with the acceptability of the COAST decision support tool is measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). This tool consists of four items designed to monitor and evaluate the success of implementation efforts. Respondents can rate each item on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores reflect greater agreement with the acceptability of the intervention.

Patients with a score of 4 or higher will be included in the numerator, while all patients who complete the measure will be included in the denominator. We will define COAST as "acceptable" if this proportion is greater than 70%.
2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST
Patient-reported appropriateness of the COAST decision support tool
Tidsramme: 2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST

The proportion of patients who agree with the appropriateness of the COAST decision support tool is measured using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). This tool consists of four items designed to evaluate the suitability and relevance of an intervention. Respondents can rate each item on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).

Higher scores reflect greater agreement with the appropriateness of the intervention.

Patients with a score of 4 or higher will be included in the numerator, while all patients who complete the measure will be included in the denominator. We will define COAST as "appropriate" if this proportion is greater than 70%.
2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST
Provider-reported feasibility of the COAST decision support tool
Tidsramme: At the conclusion of participant enrollment, approximately 1 month after the last patient is enrolled.

The proportion of healthcare providers who care for adult patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and agree on the feasibility of the COAST decision support tool is measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). This tool consists of four items designed to measure the feasibility or extent to which an intervention can be successfully used or carried out within a given setting. Respondents can rate each item on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores reflect greater agreement with the feasibility of implementing the COAST tool.

Providers with a score of 4 or higher will be included in the numerator, while all providers who complete the measure will be included in the denominator. We will define COAST as "feasible" if this proportion is 70% or greater.
At the conclusion of participant enrollment, approximately 1 month after the last patient is enrolled.

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in Baseline Decisional Conflict Scale Score
Tidsramme: Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Mean change from baseline in patient decisional conflict will be assessed via Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), which includes 5 subscales (uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support, effective decision). Each item is rated on a scale of 0 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more decisional conflict.
Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Change in patient-centered communication
Tidsramme: Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Mean change from baseline in patient-centered communication score will be assessed via Patient-Centered Communication (PCC) in cancer care. The purpose of the measure is to assess PCC in six core domains: 1) exchanging information, 2) making decisions, 3) fostering healing relationships, 4) enabling patient self-management, 5) managing uncertainty, and 6) responding to emotions. Respondents can rate each item on a scale, where higher scores indicate better patient-centered communication and greater perceived support from the healthcare team.
Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Change in decisional self-efficacy score
Tidsramme: Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Mean Change from Baseline in patient self-efficacy for making decisions will be assessed via the Decisional Self-Efficacy Scale. The Scale measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making, including shared decision-making. Respondents can rate each item on a scale from 0 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident). A score of 0 means "extremely low self-efficacy" and a score of 100 means "extremely high self-efficacy".
Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Samarbeidspartnere

Gilead Sciences

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Shoshana Rosenberg, ScD, MPH, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

1. juni 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

1. september 2027

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

1. februar 2028

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

3. juni 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

3. juni 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

9. juni 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

9. juni 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

3. juni 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juni 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Nøkkelord

Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • 25-07029092

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Kliniske studier på Avansert brystkreft

Kliniske studier på Decision Support Tool

Søk i lignende forsøk

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

CROs by country

CROs in Norway

Forhold

Sjeldne sykdommer

Legemiddelintervensjoner

Kosttilskudd

Sponsor / samarbeidspartnere

Steder

Abonnere