Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Decision Support Tool for Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer (COAST)

3 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Communicating Options for Advanced Breast Cancer Support and Treatment (COAST)

The goal of this pilot study is to understand and improve the shared decision-making process between people with advanced breast cancer and their providers regarding their care and treatment. As part of this study, the researchers will evaluate a decision support tool called COAST that was designed to support patients and providers in having meaningful conversations. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Can the COAST tool improve the quality of communication between patients and their oncology providers?
  2. Is the COAST tool acceptable, appropriate, and easy to use at NYP-Weill Cornell Medicine, NYP-Brooklyn Methodist Hospital and NYP-Queens?

Participants will be asked to fill out two surveys: one before they use the COAST tool and another about 2 - 4 weeks later. Some patients will also be invited for an interview.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

100

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Estados Unidos
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, Estados Unidos, 11215
        • NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Evelyn Taiwo, MD
      • New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10065
        • NewYork-Presbyterian David H. Koch Center
        • Investigador principal:
          • Shoshana Rosenberg, ScD, MPH
        • Contacto:
      • New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 11355
        • NewYork-Presbyterian Medical Group Queens
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Pooja Murthy, MD

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female 18 years and older
  • Diagnosis of Stage IV breast cancer
  • English, Spanish or Mandarin speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Early breast cancer
  • Individuals speaking languages other than English, Spanish, or Mandarin as their primary language

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: COAST intervention
Conductual: Decision Support Tool
The COAST decision support tool will be available in two formats: a booklet and a website. It will provide information about advanced breast cancer and the available treatment options. Participants will be guided through questions designed to clarify their goals and preferences, identify support needs, and concerns they may have.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Patient-reported acceptability of the COAST decision support tool
Periodo de tiempo: 2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST

The proportion of patients who agree with the acceptability of the COAST decision support tool is measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). This tool consists of four items designed to monitor and evaluate the success of implementation efforts. Respondents can rate each item on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores reflect greater agreement with the acceptability of the intervention.

Patients with a score of 4 or higher will be included in the numerator, while all patients who complete the measure will be included in the denominator. We will define COAST as "acceptable" if this proportion is greater than 70%.
2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST
Patient-reported appropriateness of the COAST decision support tool
Periodo de tiempo: 2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST

The proportion of patients who agree with the appropriateness of the COAST decision support tool is measured using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). This tool consists of four items designed to evaluate the suitability and relevance of an intervention. Respondents can rate each item on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).

Higher scores reflect greater agreement with the appropriateness of the intervention.

Patients with a score of 4 or higher will be included in the numerator, while all patients who complete the measure will be included in the denominator. We will define COAST as "appropriate" if this proportion is greater than 70%.
2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST
Provider-reported feasibility of the COAST decision support tool
Periodo de tiempo: At the conclusion of participant enrollment, approximately 1 month after the last patient is enrolled.

The proportion of healthcare providers who care for adult patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and agree on the feasibility of the COAST decision support tool is measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). This tool consists of four items designed to measure the feasibility or extent to which an intervention can be successfully used or carried out within a given setting. Respondents can rate each item on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores reflect greater agreement with the feasibility of implementing the COAST tool.

Providers with a score of 4 or higher will be included in the numerator, while all providers who complete the measure will be included in the denominator. We will define COAST as "feasible" if this proportion is 70% or greater.
At the conclusion of participant enrollment, approximately 1 month after the last patient is enrolled.

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Baseline Decisional Conflict Scale Score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Mean change from baseline in patient decisional conflict will be assessed via Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), which includes 5 subscales (uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support, effective decision). Each item is rated on a scale of 0 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more decisional conflict.
Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Change in patient-centered communication
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Mean change from baseline in patient-centered communication score will be assessed via Patient-Centered Communication (PCC) in cancer care. The purpose of the measure is to assess PCC in six core domains: 1) exchanging information, 2) making decisions, 3) fostering healing relationships, 4) enabling patient self-management, 5) managing uncertainty, and 6) responding to emotions. Respondents can rate each item on a scale, where higher scores indicate better patient-centered communication and greater perceived support from the healthcare team.
Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Change in decisional self-efficacy score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)
Mean Change from Baseline in patient self-efficacy for making decisions will be assessed via the Decisional Self-Efficacy Scale. The Scale measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making, including shared decision-making. Respondents can rate each item on a scale from 0 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident). A score of 0 means "extremely low self-efficacy" and a score of 100 means "extremely high self-efficacy".
Baseline and follow-up (2-4 weeks after exposure to COAST)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Colaboradores

Gilead Sciences

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Shoshana Rosenberg, ScD, MPH, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de septiembre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de febrero de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

3 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

9 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

9 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 25-07029092

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Cáncer de mama avanzado

Ensayos clínicos sobre Decision Support Tool

Buscar ensayos similares

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

CROs by country

CROs in Madagascar

Condiciones

Enfermedades Raras

Intervenciones de drogas

Suplementos dietéticos

Patrocinador / Colaboradores

Localizaciones

Suscribir