Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept in Kidney Transplant Recipients

5 de janeiro de 2016 atualizado por: Astellas Pharma Inc

Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept in Combination With Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroids in de Novo Kidney Transplantation - a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether alefacept is effective and well tolerated when used with a combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids versus a combination therapy of placebo, tacrolimus and steroids in the prevention of kidney transplant rejection.

Visão geral do estudo

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

218

Estágio

  • Fase 2

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Bochum, Alemanha, 44892
      • Regensburg, Alemanha, 93053
      • Bruxelles, Bélgica, 1070
      • Bruxelles, Bélgica, 1200
      • Gent, Bélgica, 9000
      • Leuven, Bélgica, 3000
      • Liege, Bélgica, 4000
      • Barcelona, Espanha, 8036
      • Llobregat, Espanha, 8907
      • Madrid, Espanha, 28041
      • Malaga, Espanha, 29010
      • Santander, Espanha, 39008
      • Creteil, França, 94010
      • Le Kremlin Bicetre Cedex, França, 94275
      • Montpellier, França, 34295
      • Nantes Cedex 1, França, 44093
      • Nice Cedex 1, França, 6002
      • Paris, França, 75475
      • Toulouse Cedex, França, 31054
      • Maastricht, Holanda, 6229
      • Budapest, Hungria, 1082
      • Bologna, Itália, 40138
      • Padova, Itália, 35128
      • Rome, Itália, 00168
      • Siena, Itália, 53100
      • Bydgoszcz, Polônia, 85-094
      • Poznan, Polônia, 60-479
      • Szczecin, Polônia, 70-111
      • Manchester, Reino Unido, M13 9WL
      • Praha, República Checa, 140 21
      • Goteborg, Suécia, 41345
      • Uppsala, Suécia, 75185
      • Vienna, Áustria, 1090

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos a 64 anos (Adulto)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with end stage kidney disease who is a suitable candidate for primary kidney transplantation or retransplantation
  • Male or female subject at least 18 years of age and younger than 65 years
  • Subject receiving a kidney transplant from a non-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) identical living donor or deceased HLA identical/non-HLA identical donor between 5 and 59 years of age with compatible ABO blood type (Blood group system A, B, AB and 0)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a panel reactivity antibody grade > 20% in the previous 6 months and/or had had a previous graft survival shorter than 1 year due to immunological reasons
  • Subject received a kidney transplant from a non-heart beating donor
  • Subject has received a kidney transplant from a 50 - 59 year old donor with two of the following three factors: history of hypertension, cerebrovascular accident as cause of death, final pre-procurement serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL (united network for organ sharing [UNOS] expanded criteria donor)
  • Cold ischemia time of the donor kidney is ≥ 30 hours

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Quadruplicar

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador de Placebo: Placebo
Participants received placebo administered intra-operatively as an intravenous (IV) bolus on Day 0, another IV bolus on Day 3 and weekly subcutaneous injections thereafter for 12 weeks. Participants also received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroid treatment.
IV and subcutaneous injection
The initial daily dose was 0.2 mg/kg orally given in 2 doses commencing 24 hours after completion of surgery.
Mycophenolic mofetil was administered as 750 mg twice per day orally

Methylprednisolone or equivalent:

Day 0: 500 - 1000 mg IV bolus Day 1: 125 - 250 mg IV bolus

Prednisone or equivalent:

Days 2 - 14: 20 - 30 mg orally Days 15 - 28: 10 - 20 mg orally Days 29 - 60: 10 - 15 mg orally Days 61 onwards: 5 - 10 mg orally

Experimental: Alefacept
Participants received 7.5 mg alefacept administered intra-operatively as an IV bolus on Day 0, another 7.5 mg IV bolus on Day 3, and weekly subcutaneous injections of 15 mg alefacept thereafter for 12 weeks. Participants also received tacrolimus, MMF and steroid treatment.
The initial daily dose was 0.2 mg/kg orally given in 2 doses commencing 24 hours after completion of surgery.
Mycophenolic mofetil was administered as 750 mg twice per day orally

Methylprednisolone or equivalent:

Day 0: 500 - 1000 mg IV bolus Day 1: 125 - 250 mg IV bolus

Prednisone or equivalent:

Days 2 - 14: 20 - 30 mg orally Days 15 - 28: 10 - 20 mg orally Days 29 - 60: 10 - 15 mg orally Days 61 onwards: 5 - 10 mg orally

IV and subcutaneous injection
Outros nomes:
  • Amevive

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection at Month 6 Assessed by Local Review
Prazo: 6 months

Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist.according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification:

  • Grade IA: significant interstitial infiltration (>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis;
  • Grade IB: significant interstitial infiltration (>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of severe tubulitis;
  • Grade IIA: mild to moderate intimal arteritis;
  • Grade IIB: severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area;
  • Grade III: "transmural" arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocyte inflammation.

A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit.

6 months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Antibody-Mediated Acute Rejection at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months

Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist.according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification:

Acute antibody-mediated rejection - documented anti-donor antibody ('suspicious for' if antibody not demonstrated):

  • Grade I: acute tubular necrosis-like - complement split product positive (C4d+), minimal inflammation;
  • Grade II: capillary-margination and/or thromboses, C4d+
  • Grade III: arterial - v3, C4d+.

A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed antibody-mediated acute rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit.

6 months
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection (T-Cell Mediated or Antibody Mediated) at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months

Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist.according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification. A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated or antibody-mediated rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit.

6 months
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Mixed T-Cell Mediated and Antibody-Mediated Rejection at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months

Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist.according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification. A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed acute mixed T-cell mediated and antibody-mediated rejections within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit.

6 months
Percentage of Participants With Acute Rejection Diagnosed by Signs and Symptoms at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months
Acute rejection diagnosed by signs and symptoms, including biopsy-confirmed or suspected (not confirmed by biopsy - i.e. no biopsy was performed or biopsy did not confirm an acute T-cell mediated rejection). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of acute rejection diagnosed by signs and symptoms within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit.
6 months
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months
Patients who received immunosuppressive medications for the treatment of suspected or biopsy-confirmed acute rejections were considered to have a clinically-treated acute rejection. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of clinically treated acute rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow-up visit.
6 months
Percentage of Participants With Steroid-resistant Acute Rejection at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months

A steroid-resistant acute rejection is defined as a rejection episode which did not resolve following treatment with corticosteroids. In the case that a rejection episode was not treated with corticosteroids first but only with antibodies, it was included in this category.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of steroid-resistant acute rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit.

6 months
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Confirmed Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection as Assessed by Central Review at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months

Biopsies were graded by the central reviewer according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification. A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit.

6 months
Patient Survival
Prazo: 6 months
Patient survival is any participant known to be alive at Month 6. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of patient survival within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up were censored at the time of last assessment.
6 months
Graft Survival
Prazo: 6 months

Graft survival was defined as any participant who was known to have a functioning graft (i.e., not graft loss) at 6 months. Graft loss is defined as re-transplantation, nephrectomy, death or as dialysis ongoing at end of study or at discontinuation of the participant unless superseded by follow-up information.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of graft survival within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up were censored at the time of last assessment.

6 months
Maximum Histological Grade of All Biopsies After Local Review
Prazo: 6 months

The grade of acute rejection was classified according to Banff 97/05 updated version. If a patient had more than 1 rejection episode, the episode with the most severe grade was used.

Acute T-cell mediated rejection:

  • Grade IA: significant interstitial infiltration (>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis;
  • Grade IB: significant interstitial infiltration (>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of severe tubulitis;
  • Grade IIA: mild to moderate intimal arteritis;
  • Grade IIB: severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area;
  • Grade III: "transmural" arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocyte inflammation.

Acute antibody-mediated rejection:

  • Grade I: acute tubular necrosis-like - complement split product positive (C4d+), minimal inflammation;
  • Grade II: capillary-margination and/or thromboses, C4d+
  • Grade III: arterial - v3, C4d+.
6 months
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Treatment of Rejection at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months
The Kaplan-Meier estimate of anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy for acute rejection (clinically-treated or biopsy-confirmed) within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow-up visit.
6 months
Change From Month 1 in Serum Creatinine
Prazo: Month 1, 3, and 6
Month 1, 3, and 6
Change From Month 1 in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
Prazo: Month 1, 3, and 6
The GFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula.
Month 1, 3, and 6
Change From Month 1 in Creatinine Clearance
Prazo: Month 1, 3, and 6
The creatinine clearance was calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
Month 1, 3, and 6
GFR Measured by Iothalamate Clearance at Month 6
Prazo: Month 6
GFR measured using the iothalamate clearance method and determined by a central laboratory.
Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months

Efficacy failure is defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated rejection assessed by local reading or lost to follow-up.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of efficacy failure within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported.

6 months
Percentage of Participants With Delayed Graft Function
Prazo: 1 week
Delayed graft function was defined as the requirement for dialysis within the first week post-transplant.
1 week
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at Month 6
Prazo: 6 months
Treatment failure is defined as efficacy failure (death, graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated rejection assessed by local reading, lost to follow-up) or early discontinuation of alefacept/placebo at any time (during the 12-week administration period) for any reason. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of treatment failure within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow-up visit.
6 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Prazo: 6 Months

Causally related was defined as adverse events (AEs) assessed by the Investigator as possibly or probably related to study drug or records where the relationship was missing.

A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

  • Resulted in death.
  • Was life-threatening.
  • Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity.
  • Resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect.
  • Required patient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization
  • Was considered a medically important event.

All rejections and any BK virus, Epstein Barr virus and/or cytomegalovirus infection had to be reported as an SAE

6 Months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de dezembro de 2007

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de setembro de 2009

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de setembro de 2009

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

6 de fevereiro de 2008

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

6 de fevereiro de 2008

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

18 de fevereiro de 2008

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)

4 de fevereiro de 2016

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

5 de janeiro de 2016

Última verificação

1 de janeiro de 2016

Mais Informações

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em Transplante Renal De Novo

3
Se inscrever