Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

STEM Como Sou Fase I (STEM AIM)

30 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.

STEM Como Eu Sou: Uma Ferramenta Culturalmente Relevante com Recurso a Media para Envolver Alunos Afrodescendentes do Ensino Básico e as Suas Famílias em STEM

Black students experience significant achievement gaps that contribute to underrepresentation in high paying STEM fields and disparity in health and economic outcomes. Effective middle-school interventions include exposure to culturally relevant STEM role models, instruction in academic behaviors and growth mindset, instruction in the academic vocabulary required to pass high stakes achievement tests, and support for family engagement. The goal of this proposal is to develop a media-enhanced technology that offers Black middle school students and their families a culturally responsive support tool for engaging in STEM learning in the home setting.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

The feasibility test will consist of a 6-week intervention to assess the program's relevance, acceptability, cultural appropriateness, and potential for efficacy. The study will use a within-subjects pre-post design with 50 parent-student dyads to detect changes in student word knowledge, academic enabling behaviors, mindset, academic self-efficacy, and interest in STEM. Measures will also detect changes in parent word knowledge, use of AV words in the home, and self-efficacy with regard to AV use and academic support behaviors. Additionally, a post-test evaluation of consumer satisfaction, technology acceptability, and recommendations for modifications to the program will be administered to both students and their parents/guardians. Usage reports will be collected from the technology's backend system to measure frequency and duration of student and parent engagement with the technology components as well as numbers of correct/incorrect responses.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

138

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

10 anos e mais velhos (Filho, Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

  1. being the parent/guardian of a middle school student who identifies as Black/African American
  2. having a smartphone or tablet

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Outro
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: STEM-AIM

The STEM-AIM app will provide students and their families with a media-enhanced learning experience. Videos will feature Black STEM heroes who describe their paths to STEM and the growth mindset skills that helped them overcome barriers and challenges. STEM heroes and near-peer vignettes introduce a set of academic vocabulary words that underlie STEM achievement. Users then practice drag and drop definition, spelling, and usage games.

Mobile app to deliver culturally responsive role modeling and evidence-based instruction (modeling, practice, feedback) in the academic vocabulary, behaviors, and mindset that underlie STEM success.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Student Academic Vocabulary Word Meaning (SAVM)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

SAVM will measure change in student vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge.

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Parent Academic Vocabulary Word Meaning (PAVM)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

PAVM will measure change in parent vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge.

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Student Academic Vocabulary Word Usage (SAVWU)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

SAVWU will measure change in student ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence.

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Parent Academic Vocabulary Word Usage (PAVWU)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

PAVWU will measure change in parent ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence.

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Student Fixed Mindset (SFM)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

SFM is a four-item survey measure of fixed mindset. Student responds to statements about their beliefs about learning and intelligence. The measure uses a 6-point scale. The item scores are averaged into a single scale and can range from 1 to 6, with higher values corresondeing to more fixed mindsets. The measure has demonstrated reliability (Yeager et al., 2016).

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Student Academic Behaviors (SAB)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

SAB is a five-item survey measure of academic behaviors strongly linked to student success. Students respond to questions about how frequently they engage in these behaviors (e.g., turn in assignments on time). The measure uses a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and a mean score was computed and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater levels of perceived academic learning behaviors., and has demonstrated reliability (Snipes & Tran, 2016).

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Student Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors (SAVUB)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

SAVUB will measure change in student use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words.

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Parent Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors (SAVUB)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

SAVUB will measure change in parent use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words.

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Student Confidence in using AV words (SCAV)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

SCAV will measure student confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words.

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Parent Confidence in using AV words (PCAV)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

PCAV will measure parent confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .95) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words.

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Student Interest in choosing STEM careers (STEM)
Prazo: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)

STEM will measure students' interest in STEM careers (4 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010) and the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all interested, 5 = extremely interested) and a mean score was computed and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater interest in using SAV words.

Baseline (pre-treatment) and 6 weeks (post-treatment)
Student Technology Acceptance (STA) - Acceptability of Intervention (AIM)
Prazo: 6-weeks after baseline (Post treatment)

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM; 4-items) is a measure that often used in formative studies and are considered leading indicators of implementation success (Proctor et al., 2011; Bowen et al., 2009). Uses a 5-point response option, have demonstrated reliability, test-retest reliability, and shown to assess sensitivity to change (Weiner et al. 2017). A mean score will be computed and scores can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the intervention.

6-weeks after baseline (Post treatment)
Student Technology Acceptance (STA) - Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Prazo: 6-weeks after baseline (Post treatment)

Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM; 4-items) is a measure that often used in formative studies and are considered leading indicators of implementation success (Proctor et al., 2011; Bowen et al., 2009). Uses a 5-point response option, have demonstrated reliability, test-retest reliability, and shown to assess sensitivity to change (Weiner et al. 2017). A mean score will be computed and scores can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater approriateness of the intervention.

6-weeks after baseline (Post treatment)
Parent Technology Acceptance (PTA) - Acceptability of Intervention (AIM)
Prazo: 6-weeks after baseline (post treatment)

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM; 4-items) is a measure that often used in formative studies and are considered leading indicators of implementation success (Proctor et al., 2011; Bowen et al., 2009). Uses a 5-point response option, have demonstrated reliability, test-retest reliability, and shown to assess sensitivity to change (Weiner et al. 2017). A mean score will be computed and scores can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the intervention.

6-weeks after baseline (post treatment)
Parent Technology Acceptance (PTA) - Intervention Approriateness Measure (IAM)
Prazo: 6-weeks after baseline (post treatment)

Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM; 4-items) is a measure that often used in formative studies and are considered leading indicators of implementation success (Proctor et al., 2011; Bowen et al., 2009). Uses a 5-point response option, have demonstrated reliability, test-retest reliability, and shown to assess sensitivity to change (Weiner et al. 2017). A mean score will be computed and scores can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater approriateness of the intervention.

6-weeks after baseline (post treatment)
Student Satisfaction with STEM-AIM Program
Prazo: 6-weeks after baseline (post treatment)

Student satisfaction with the STEM-AIM program will be measured with 15 items that ask students to rate, on a 5-point Likert response scale, the degree to which the STEM-AIM features were helpful, useful, enjoyable, and met their expectations. A mean score will be computed and scores can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the program.

6-weeks after baseline (post treatment)
Parent Satisfaction with STEM-AIM Program
Prazo: 6-weeks after baseline (post treatment)

Parent satisfaction with the STEM-AIM program will be measured with 15 items that ask parents to rate, on a 5-point Likert response scale, the degree to which the STEM-AIM features were helpful, useful, enjoyable, and met their expectations. A mean score will be computed and scores can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the program.

6-weeks after baseline (post treatment)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: David R Smith, PhD, Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de novembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

31 de janeiro de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

31 de março de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

16 de fevereiro de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

26 de fevereiro de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

3 de março de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

2 de outubro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

30 de setembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • MD020230
  • 1R43MD020230-01 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

INDECISO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever