- ICH GCP
- Amerikanska kliniska prövningsregistret
- Klinisk prövning NCT05972525
Vad är viktigt för patienter med svår höft- eller knäartros? (PATI-Project)
Vad är viktigt för patienter med svår höft- eller knäartros? Beslutskvalitet, patientengagemang och hälsoresultat
This clinical trial aims to investigate if shared decision-making, and the use of an in-consultation patient decision aid (PtDA), increases the decisional quality and therefore treatment satisfaction and outcome of patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis.
Finally, an evaluation will be conducted on patient-reported outcomes on pain, physical function, quality of life (QoL), and patient satisfaction, up to one year after surgery.
Studieöversikt
Status
Betingelser
Detaljerad beskrivning
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease and a major cause of disability worldwide. The condition typically affects the hip or knee, and as the condition progresses it frequently causes debilitating pain and stiffness in the affected joints; thus impairing mobility, and decreasing function and quality of life(QoL).
Approximately 10,300 primary hip arthroplasties (THA) and 10,000 primary knee arthroplasties (TKA/UKA) were performed in Denmark in 2021.
For the majority of patients with severe osteoarthritis, evidence shows that joint replacement surgery is life-changing. Despite this documented effect, not all patients achieve optimal results. Patient dissatisfaction following THA and TKA has been reported as 7 % and 11-18%, respectively.
It is hypothesized that a lack of adequate information and patient involvement in the decision process might lead to the misalignment of patients' expectations and subsequent dissatisfaction. Considerable evidence shows that patients prefer more information and greater involvement. This strongly supports the concept that patients need to be actively involved in treatment decisions.
Accordingly, increasing patient involvement in healthcare decisions may be beneficial. Shared decision-making (SDM) supports patients' active involvement in the process and improves the quality of decisions. SDM can be facilitated using a PtDA, which has shown significant benefits in a range of patient groups. However, research on SDM and PtDAs in patients with severe hip or knee OA is lacking.
The overall aim of this project is to investigate if an in-consultation PtDA increases the decision quality for patients with severe OA of the hip or knee.
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Studieorter
-
-
-
Odense, Danmark, 5000
- Odense University Hospital, OUH
-
Svendborg, Danmark, 5700
- Odense University Hospital, OUH
-
Vejle, Danmark, 7100
- Lillebaelt Hospital - Vejle
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
Tar emot friska volontärer
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Severe primary osteoarthritis eligible for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) / primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) / primary partial knee arthroplasty (UKA)
- Able to understand and read Danish
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous THA, TKA, or UKA on the contralateral side
- Cognitive impairment
- Non-OA-related reason for the visit
- No digital mailbox (E-boks)
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Stödjande vård
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Enda
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: Shared decision-making (SDM)
Patients will be informed by a nurse before being consulted by the surgeon randomized to SDM and use the in-consultation PtDA during the consultation on patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis |
The intervention group has been involved in the development process of the PtDA. After receiving a training course in SDM and the use of a PtDA, the surgeons will practice SDM supported by an in-consultation PtDA during the consultations with the participant. |
|
Inget ingripande: Usual practice
Patients will be informed by a nurse before being consulted by the surgeon randomized to usual practice during the consultation on patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis |
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
The participant's decisional quality according to The Hip/Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI).
Tidsram: Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
Informed Patient-Centered (IPC) decision is calculated as the percentage of patients who are well-informed and received their preferred treatment. |
Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant's engagement in the decision-making process as measured by the CollaboRATE questionnaire
Tidsram: Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more shared decision-making |
Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
|
Participant's involvement in the decision-making process as measured by the HK-DQI questionnaire
Tidsram: Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
HK-DQI, section 3, decision-making process: Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more shared decision-making |
Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
|
The duration of consultation when PtDA is used compared to standard consultation without the use of PtDA.
Tidsram: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
The time duration will be documented by the surgeons |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Andra resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant's Qol when undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery as measured by EuroQol (EQ-5D)
Tidsram: Three months and one year following surgery.
|
QoL: EuroQol (EQ-5D): Measuring the health-related quality of life. Presenting in three levels; Level 1: Indicating no problem, to Level 3: Indicating extreme problems |
Three months and one year following surgery.
|
|
The participant's pain and physical function after undergoing hip replacement surgery as measured by the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) questionnaire
Tidsram: Three months and one year following surgery
|
Oxford Hip Score (OHS): Measuring function and pain with patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. Total scores range from 0 (poorest function) to 48 (maximal function). |
Three months and one year following surgery
|
|
The participant's pain and physical function after undergoing knee replacement surgery as measured by the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaire
Tidsram: Three months and one year following surgery
|
Oxford Knee Score (OKS): Measuring function and pain with patients undergoing knee replacement surgery. Total scores range from 0 (poorest function) to 48 (maximal function). |
Three months and one year following surgery
|
|
The participant's physical function after undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery as measured by Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) questionnaire
Tidsram: Three months and one year following surgery.
|
Forgotten joint score (FJS): Measuring the participants' awareness of their artificial joint during activity of daily living (ADL). Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint. |
Three months and one year following surgery.
|
|
Participant's regret of the treatment decision as measured by the Decision Regret Scale questionnaire.
Tidsram: Three months and one year following surgery.
|
The Decision Regret Scale: Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more regret. |
Three months and one year following surgery.
|
|
Participant's satisfaction after undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery as measured by the patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ)
Tidsram: Three months and one year following surgery.
|
The patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ): The higher the value the more satisfaction. |
Three months and one year following surgery.
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Sponsor
Samarbetspartners
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Trine Ahlmann, PhD stud, Vejle Hospital
- Studiestol: Claus Varnum, Ass.Prof.MD, Vejle Hospital
- Studiestol: Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Ass.Prof.MD., Odense University Hospital
- Studiestol: Charlotte Myhre Jensen, Ass.Prof.RN, Odense University Hospital
- Studiestol: Karina Dahl Steffensen, Prof.MD., Vejle Hospital
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Faktisk)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Nyckelord
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- S-20200137
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivning
All data of the outcome measures will be available in an anonymized form if required by the scientific journal, in which the results of the trial will be published.
Tidsram för IPD-delning
Data will be available after the publication of the trial
Kriterier för IPD Sharing Access
Data access will be reviewed by the author's group
IPD-delning som stöder informationstyp
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAV
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .