- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT05972525
Was ist für Patienten mit schwerer Hüft- oder Kniearthrose wichtig? (PATI-Project)
Was ist für Patienten mit schwerer Hüft- oder Kniearthrose wichtig? Entscheidungsqualität, Patientenbeteiligung und Gesundheitsergebnis
This clinical trial aims to investigate if shared decision-making, and the use of an in-consultation patient decision aid (PtDA), increases the decisional quality and therefore treatment satisfaction and outcome of patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis.
Finally, an evaluation will be conducted on patient-reported outcomes on pain, physical function, quality of life (QoL), and patient satisfaction, up to one year after surgery.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease and a major cause of disability worldwide. The condition typically affects the hip or knee, and as the condition progresses it frequently causes debilitating pain and stiffness in the affected joints; thus impairing mobility, and decreasing function and quality of life(QoL).
Approximately 10,300 primary hip arthroplasties (THA) and 10,000 primary knee arthroplasties (TKA/UKA) were performed in Denmark in 2021.
For the majority of patients with severe osteoarthritis, evidence shows that joint replacement surgery is life-changing. Despite this documented effect, not all patients achieve optimal results. Patient dissatisfaction following THA and TKA has been reported as 7 % and 11-18%, respectively.
It is hypothesized that a lack of adequate information and patient involvement in the decision process might lead to the misalignment of patients' expectations and subsequent dissatisfaction. Considerable evidence shows that patients prefer more information and greater involvement. This strongly supports the concept that patients need to be actively involved in treatment decisions.
Accordingly, increasing patient involvement in healthcare decisions may be beneficial. Shared decision-making (SDM) supports patients' active involvement in the process and improves the quality of decisions. SDM can be facilitated using a PtDA, which has shown significant benefits in a range of patient groups. However, research on SDM and PtDAs in patients with severe hip or knee OA is lacking.
The overall aim of this project is to investigate if an in-consultation PtDA increases the decision quality for patients with severe OA of the hip or knee.
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
-
Odense, Dänemark, 5000
- Odense University Hospital, OUH
-
Svendborg, Dänemark, 5700
- Odense University Hospital, OUH
-
Vejle, Dänemark, 7100
- Lillebaelt Hospital - Vejle
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Severe primary osteoarthritis eligible for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) / primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) / primary partial knee arthroplasty (UKA)
- Able to understand and read Danish
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous THA, TKA, or UKA on the contralateral side
- Cognitive impairment
- Non-OA-related reason for the visit
- No digital mailbox (E-boks)
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Single
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Shared decision-making (SDM)
Patients will be informed by a nurse before being consulted by the surgeon randomized to SDM and use the in-consultation PtDA during the consultation on patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis |
The intervention group has been involved in the development process of the PtDA. After receiving a training course in SDM and the use of a PtDA, the surgeons will practice SDM supported by an in-consultation PtDA during the consultations with the participant. |
|
Kein Eingriff: Usual practice
Patients will be informed by a nurse before being consulted by the surgeon randomized to usual practice during the consultation on patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis |
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
The participant's decisional quality according to The Hip/Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI).
Zeitfenster: Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
Informed Patient-Centered (IPC) decision is calculated as the percentage of patients who are well-informed and received their preferred treatment. |
Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant's engagement in the decision-making process as measured by the CollaboRATE questionnaire
Zeitfenster: Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more shared decision-making |
Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
|
Participant's involvement in the decision-making process as measured by the HK-DQI questionnaire
Zeitfenster: Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
HK-DQI, section 3, decision-making process: Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more shared decision-making |
Within one week after inclusion in the consultation
|
|
The duration of consultation when PtDA is used compared to standard consultation without the use of PtDA.
Zeitfenster: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
The time duration will be documented by the surgeons |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Andere Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant's Qol when undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery as measured by EuroQol (EQ-5D)
Zeitfenster: Three months and one year following surgery.
|
QoL: EuroQol (EQ-5D): Measuring the health-related quality of life. Presenting in three levels; Level 1: Indicating no problem, to Level 3: Indicating extreme problems |
Three months and one year following surgery.
|
|
The participant's pain and physical function after undergoing hip replacement surgery as measured by the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) questionnaire
Zeitfenster: Three months and one year following surgery
|
Oxford Hip Score (OHS): Measuring function and pain with patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. Total scores range from 0 (poorest function) to 48 (maximal function). |
Three months and one year following surgery
|
|
The participant's pain and physical function after undergoing knee replacement surgery as measured by the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaire
Zeitfenster: Three months and one year following surgery
|
Oxford Knee Score (OKS): Measuring function and pain with patients undergoing knee replacement surgery. Total scores range from 0 (poorest function) to 48 (maximal function). |
Three months and one year following surgery
|
|
The participant's physical function after undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery as measured by Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) questionnaire
Zeitfenster: Three months and one year following surgery.
|
Forgotten joint score (FJS): Measuring the participants' awareness of their artificial joint during activity of daily living (ADL). Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint. |
Three months and one year following surgery.
|
|
Participant's regret of the treatment decision as measured by the Decision Regret Scale questionnaire.
Zeitfenster: Three months and one year following surgery.
|
The Decision Regret Scale: Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more regret. |
Three months and one year following surgery.
|
|
Participant's satisfaction after undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery as measured by the patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ)
Zeitfenster: Three months and one year following surgery.
|
The patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ): The higher the value the more satisfaction. |
Three months and one year following surgery.
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Mitarbeiter
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Trine Ahlmann, PhD stud, Vejle Hospital
- Studienstuhl: Claus Varnum, Ass.Prof.MD, Vejle Hospital
- Studienstuhl: Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Ass.Prof.MD., Odense University Hospital
- Studienstuhl: Charlotte Myhre Jensen, Ass.Prof.RN, Odense University Hospital
- Studienstuhl: Karina Dahl Steffensen, Prof.MD., Vejle Hospital
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- S-20200137
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
All data of the outcome measures will be available in an anonymized form if required by the scientific journal, in which the results of the trial will be published.
IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen
Data will be available after the publication of the trial
IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien
Data access will be reviewed by the author's group
Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen
- STUDIENPROTOKOLL
- SAFT
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .