同行为回国公民提供情景式未来思考
2025年2月22日 更新者:Julia Felton、Henry Ford Health System
同行提供情景未来思考,以提高归国公民的 MOUD 治疗参与度 - 一项随机对照试验
这项观察研究的目的是检验在为患有物质使用障碍 (SUD) 的回国公民提供物质使用治疗环境中进行简短的、情景性的未来思维 (EFT) 干预的有效性。
它旨在回答的主要问题是:
- 确定主动 EFT 干预在降低延迟贴现率、提高治疗保留率和动机以及减少药物滥用方面的初步有效性。
- 检查这种方法的初步有效性,特别关注患者的结果,包括治疗保留、治疗动机和药物使用。
参与者将被要求参加前后评估问卷,参与单集简短干预,然后进行定制的电话随访。
研究概览
详细说明
患有药物滥用障碍 (SUD) 的回国公民在出狱后的前两周内吸毒过量的风险最大。
因此,重返期对于确保个人参与并保留专业干预服务特别重要。
在此期间,个人还面临许多且具有高度影响力的决定。
他们需要完成复杂的任务(找工作、保障住房),而经济和社会支持往往有限。
特别值得关注的是,最近的研究表明,重返阶段通常以不稳定和资源有限为特征,可能会强化一种倾向于满足眼前需求而不是进行长期规划的决策方法。
相对于较大的、延迟的奖励(称为延迟折扣),这种注重获得较小但立即可用的奖励的做法反过来又与许多负面的健康结果相关,包括药物滥用和不良的治疗结果(较高的辍学率和较低的积极性) )。
换句话说,重返环境可能会创造一个环境,强化个人从事短期、寻求奖励行为的倾向(例如,追求奖励的行为)。
当他们的决定产生非常重大的后果(复发、累犯)时,他们会使用药物、跳过治疗预约)。
本研究将检验实施低成本、简短的干预措施(情景未来思维)的有效性,该干预措施旨在减少重返人群的延迟折扣,为旨在减少药物滥用和改善治疗结果的更广泛的公共卫生工作提供信息。
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
40
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit、Michigan、美国、48208
- Detroit Recovery Project
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
是的
描述
纳入标准:
- 年满 18 岁
- 12 个月内的监禁经历
- 识别为物质使用回收中的个人
- 愿意参与研究
- 能够参加用英语进行的书面评估和干预
- 愿意在一个月内每两周收到一次简短的报到电话、电子邮件以及与研究参与相关的其他电话消息,包括根据需要的短信/短信
排除标准:
- 个人没有资格或不愿意参加研究活动和评估
- 自我报告活动性和未经治疗的精神病
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:预防
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:延长重返大气层时间范围 (ETHoR)
情景未来思维(EFT)利用参与者对未来事件的描述来延长个人的时间视野。
在 EFT 范式中,参与者被要求对未来可能发生的具体、积极的事件进行创建和想象的生动描述。
最近的研究表明,引导 EFT 专注于特定目标(即
唤起自己从事与期望的未来结果一致的活动的形象)与不良健康行为的强烈减少有关。
因此,作为 ETHoR 条件的一部分,参与者将被要求口头描述和想象四个具体事件,这些事件反映了参与者从事实质性和非监禁活动的积极活动,对应于预定的未来时间点。
PRC 将鼓励参与者包含尽可能多的背景和情感细节。
|
经过调整的情景未来思维(EFT)干预将侧重于生成生动的、无实质内容的、有益的事件,这些事件可能在无监禁的未来发生。
其他名称:
|
|
有源比较器:标准化近期思维 (ERT)
对照组中的个人使用 SET;控制情景思维激活但不参与前景(情景未来思维的假设机制,未来结果)的方法与不良健康行为的强烈减少相关。
因此,作为 SET 条件的一部分,参与者将被要求口头描述和想象四个反映积极活动的当前事件,其中参与者从事与当前经历相对应的实质性和无监禁活动。
PRC 将鼓励参与者包含尽可能多的背景和情感细节。
|
在标准化情景思维(SET)条件下,参与者将以生动的细节描述最近发生的事件。
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
延迟贴现的变化 5 试行调整措施
大体时间:基线和干预后 3 个月内
|
基于计算机的调整金额折扣任务使用调整算法来确定立即可用资金的金额,该金额相当于延迟了以随机顺序呈现的七个离散时间段(即 1 天、1 周、1月、6 个月、1 年、5 年和 25 年)。
在每次延迟时,首先在延迟的较大总和和立即可用的较小总和之间进行选择。
对于每次试验,延迟金额和即时金额的位置是随机分配的,参与者通过按下相应的响应按钮来选择首选选项。
|
基线和干预后 3 个月内
|
|
考虑未来后果量表的变化
大体时间:基线和干预后 3 个月内
|
对未来后果的考虑量表 1 (CFCS-14) 是一份包含 14 项的自我报告问卷,用于评估对个人行为的长期影响的积极考虑。
CFCS-14 得分较低与更加关注眼前需求有关,并且被发现与较少参与健康行为 1819 和较多物质使用有关。
该测量已在成人样本中广泛使用,并表现出很强的信度和效度。
研究表明与 MCQ 存在适度但显着的相关性。
|
基线和干预后 3 个月内
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
短期密歇根酒精筛查测试 (SMAST) 的变化
大体时间:基线和干预后 3 个月内
|
SMAST 是一份简短的调查问卷,包含 13 个项目。
它只需几分钟即可完成,专为阅读水平相当于七年级学生的个人而设计。
该评估工具源自密歇根酒精中毒筛查测试,被发现是检测高风险饮酒、酒精滥用或酒精中毒的可靠诊断工具。
评估数据表明其有效性,没有出现明显的误报。
|
基线和干预后 3 个月内
|
|
药物滥用筛查测试 (DAST) 的变化
大体时间:基线和干预后 3 个月内
|
DAST 提供了一种简明的自我报告工具,用于筛查人群、识别临床病例以及研究与药物滥用相关的治疗效果。
它适用于成人和年龄较大的青少年。
DAST-10 提供了药物滥用相关后果程度的数字衡量标准。
执行评估大约需要 5 分钟 DAST-10 是由 28 个项目的较长对应项目浓缩而成,包括 10 个自我报告项目。
|
基线和干预后 3 个月内
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
- Amlung M, Vedelago L, Acker J, Balodis I, MacKillop J. Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis of continuous associations. Addiction. 2017 Jan;112(1):51-62. doi: 10.1111/add.13535. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
- Felton JW, Collado A, Ingram K, Lejuez CW, Yi R. Changes in delay discounting, substance use, and weight status across adolescence. Health Psychol. 2020 May;39(5):413-420. doi: 10.1037/hea0000833. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
- Liu L, Feng T, Chen J, Li H. The value of emotion: how does episodic prospection modulate delay discounting? PLoS One. 2013 Nov 28;8(11):e81717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081717. eCollection 2013.
- Binswanger IA, Blatchford PJ, Mueller SR, Stern MF. Mortality after prison release: opioid overdose and other causes of death, risk factors, and time trends from 1999 to 2009. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Nov 5;159(9):592-600. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-9-201311050-00005.
- Stein JS, Wilson AG, Koffarnus MN, Daniel TO, Epstein LH, Bickel WK. Unstuck in time: episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette smoking. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Oct;233(21-22):3771-3778. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4410-y. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
- Satinsky EN, Doran K, Felton JW, Kleinman M, Dean D, Magidson JF. Adapting a peer recovery coach-delivered behavioral activation intervention for problematic substance use in a medically underserved community in Baltimore City. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 31;15(1):e0228084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228084. eCollection 2020.
- Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Epstein LH, Cuevas J, Rodgers K, Wileyto EP. Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Aug 1;103(3):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.019. Epub 2009 May 14.
- Daniel TO, Said M, Stanton CM, Epstein LH. Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and energy intake in children. Eat Behav. 2015 Aug;18:20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
- Chiou WB, Wu WH. Episodic Future Thinking Involving the Nonsmoking Self Can Induce Lower Discounting and Cigarette Consumption. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Jan;78(1):106-112. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.106.
- Mani A, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zhao J. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science. 2013 Aug 30;341(6149):976-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1238041.
- Felton JW, Collado A, Ingram KM, Doran K, Yi R. Improvement of Working Memory is a Mechanism for Reductions in Delay Discounting Among Mid-Age Individuals in an Urban Medically Underserved Area. Ann Behav Med. 2019 Oct 7;53(11):988-998. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz010.
- Weisz JR, Jensen AL, McLeod BD. Development and Dissemination of Child and Adolescent Psychotherapies: Milestones, Methods, and a New Deployment-Focused Model. In: Psychosocial Treatments for Child and Adolescent Disorders: Empirically Based Strategies for Clinical Practice, 2nd Ed. American Psychological Association; 2005:9-39.
- Holt DD, Green L, Myerson J. Is discounting impulsive?. Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students. Behav Processes. 2003 Oct 31;64(3):355-367. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00141-4.
- Reif S, Braude L, Lyman DR, Dougherty RH, Daniels AS, Ghose SS, Salim O, Delphin-Rittmon ME. Peer recovery support for individuals with substance use disorders: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jul;65(7):853-61. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400047.
- Zeng S, Minton TD. Jail Inmates in 2019. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Accessed July 15, 2022. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/jail-inmates-2019
- Loeffler CE, Nagin DS. The Impact of Incarceration on Recidivism. Annu Rev Criminol. 2022;5(1):133-152. doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-112506
- NIDA. Criminal Justice DrugFacts. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Published June 1, 2020. Accessed July 11, 2022. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/criminal-justice
- Pizzicato LN, Drake R, Domer-Shank R, Johnson CC, Viner KM. Beyond the walls: Risk factors for overdose mortality following release from the Philadelphia Department of Prisons. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Aug 1;189:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.04.034. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
- Garland B, Wodahl EJ, Mayfield J. Prisoner Reentry in a Small Metropolitan Community: Obstacles and Policy Recommendations. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2011;22(1):90-110. doi:10.1177/0887403409359804
- Jonson CL, Cullen FT. Prisoner reentry programs. Crime and justice. 2015;44(1):517-575.
- Solomon AL. From prison to work: The employment dimensions of prisoner reentry. Published online 2004.
- Hattery AJ, Smith E. Prisoner Reentry and Social Capital: The Long Road to Reintegration. Lexington Books; 2010.
- Grieb SM, Crawford A, Fields J, Smith H, Harris R, Matson P. "The stress will kill you": prisoner reentry as experienced by family members and the urgent need for support services. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014 Aug;25(3):1183-200. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0118.
- Amso D, Lynn A. Distinctive Mechanisms of Adversity and Socioeconomic Inequality in Child Development: A Review and Recommendations for Evidence-Based Policy. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2017;4(2):139-146. doi: 10.1177/2372732217721933. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
- Sheridan MA, Peverill M, Finn AS, McLaughlin KA. Dimensions of childhood adversity have distinct associations with neural systems underlying executive functioning. Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Dec;29(5):1777-1794. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417001390.
- Wesarg C, Akker ALVD, Oei NYL, Hoeve M, Wiers RW. Identifying pathways from early adversity to psychopathology: A review on dysregulated HPA axis functioning and impaired self-regulation in early childhood. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2020;17(6):808-827. doi:10.1080/17405629.2020.1748594
- Friedel E, Schlagenhauf F, Beck A, Dolan RJ, Huys QJ, Rapp MA, Heinz A. The effects of life stress and neural learning signals on fluid intelligence. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015 Feb;265(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s00406-014-0519-3. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
- Platt JM, McLaughlin KA, Luedtke AR, Ahern J, Kaufman AS, Keyes KM. Targeted Estimation of the Relationship Between Childhood Adversity and Fluid Intelligence in a US Population Sample of Adolescents. Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 1;187(7):1456-1466. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy006.
- Acheson A, Vincent AS, Cohoon A, Lovallo WR. Early life adversity and increased delay discounting: Findings from the Family Health Patterns project. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Apr;27(2):153-159. doi: 10.1037/pha0000241. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
- Martinez JL, Hasty C, Morabito D, Maranges HM, Schmidt NB, Maner JK. Perceptions of childhood unpredictability, delay discounting, risk-taking, and adult externalizing behaviors: A life-history approach. Dev Psychopathol. 2022 May;34(2):705-717. doi: 10.1017/S0954579421001607. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
- Stevens L, Verdejo-Garcia A, Roeyers H, Goudriaan AE, Vanderplasschen W. Delay discounting, treatment motivation and treatment retention among substance-dependent individuals attending an in inpatient detoxification program. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Feb;49:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
- Washio Y, Higgins ST, Heil SH, McKerchar TL, Badger GJ, Skelly JM, Dantona RL. Delay discounting is associated with treatment response among cocaine-dependent outpatients. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jun;19(3):243-8. doi: 10.1037/a0023617.
- Sheffer CE, Christensen DR, Landes R, Carter LP, Jackson L, Bickel WK. Delay discounting rates: a strong prognostic indicator of smoking relapse. Addict Behav. 2014 Nov;39(11):1682-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 May 5.
- Duffy KA, McLaughlin KA, Green PA. Early life adversity and health-risk behaviors: proposed psychological and neural mechanisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Sep;1428(1):151-169. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13928. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
- Kim-Spoon J, Lauharatanahirun N, Peviani K, Brieant A, Deater-Deckard K, Bickel WK, King-Casas B. Longitudinal pathways linking family risk, neural risk processing, delay discounting, and adolescent substance use. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;60(6):655-664. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13015. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
- Levitt EE, Amlung MT, Gonzalez A, Oshri A, MacKillop J. Consistent evidence of indirect effects of impulsive delay discounting and negative urgency between childhood adversity and adult substance use in two samples. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Jul;238(7):2011-2020. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05827-6. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
- Trommsdorff G, Lamm H. Future orientation of institutionalized and noninstitutionalized delinquents and nondelinquents. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1980;10(3):247-278.
- Arantes J, Berg ME, Lawlor D, Grace RC. Offenders have higher delay-discounting rates than non-offenders after controlling for differences in drug and alcohol abuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2013;18(2):240-253. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02052.x
- Snider SE, LaConte SM, Bickel WK. Episodic Future Thinking: Expansion of the Temporal Window in Individuals with Alcohol Dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Jul;40(7):1558-66. doi: 10.1111/acer.13112. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
- Garcia-Perez A, Aonso-Diego G, Weidberg S, Secades-Villa R. Effects of episodic future thinking on reinforcement pathology during smoking cessation treatment among individuals with substance use disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Feb;239(2):631-642. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-06057-6. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
- Sze YY, Stein JS, Bickel WK, Paluch RA, Epstein LH. Bleak Present, Bright Future: Online Episodic Future Thinking, Scarcity, Delay Discounting, and Food Demand. Clin Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul;5(4):683-697. doi: 10.1177/2167702617696511. Epub 2017 May 2.
- Sze YY, Daniel TO, Kilanowski CK, Collins RL, Epstein LH. Web-Based and Mobile Delivery of an Episodic Future Thinking Intervention for Overweight and Obese Families: A Feasibility Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Dec 16;3(4):e97. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4603.
- O'Neill J, Daniel TO, Epstein LH. Episodic future thinking reduces eating in a food court. Eat Behav. 2016 Jan;20:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
- Kaplan BA, Reed DD, Jarmolowicz DP. Effects of episodic future thinking on discounting: Personalized age-progressed pictures improve risky long-term health decisions. J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Mar;49(1):148-69. doi: 10.1002/jaba.277. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
- Dassen FCM, Jansen A, Nederkoorn C, Houben K. Focus on the future: Episodic future thinking reduces discount rate and snacking. Appetite. 2016 Jan 1;96:327-332. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.032. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
- Rosch SA, Stramaccia DF, Benoit RG. Promoting farsighted decisions via episodic future thinking: A meta-analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jul;151(7):1606-1635. doi: 10.1037/xge0001148. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
- Patel H, Amlung M. Acute and extended exposure to episodic future thinking in a treatment seeking addiction sample: A pilot study. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Sep;116:108046. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108046. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
- O'Donnell S, Oluyomi Daniel T, Epstein LH. Does goal relevant episodic future thinking amplify the effect on delay discounting? Conscious Cogn. 2017 May;51:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
- Van Ginneken E. The role of hope in preparation for release from prison. Prison Service Journal. 2015;220(1):10-15.
- Vuk M, Applegate BK. From Future Orientation to Readiness for Reentry: An Exploratory Study of Prelease Cognitions of Incarcerated Men. Incarceration. 2021;2(3):26326663211052280. doi:10.1177/26326663211052282
- Eddie D, Hoffman L, Vilsaint C, Abry A, Bergman B, Hoeppner B, Weinstein C, Kelly JF. Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching. Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 13;10:1052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052. eCollection 2019.
- Gagne CA, Finch WL, Myrick KJ, Davis LM. Peer Workers in the Behavioral and Integrated Health Workforce: Opportunities and Future Directions. Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jun;54(6 Suppl 3):S258-S266. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.010.
- Victor G, Sightes E, Watson DP, Ray B, Bailey K, Robision L, Fears G, Edwards R, Salyers M. Designing and implementing an intervention for returning citizens living with substance use disorder: discovering the benefits of peer recovery coach involvement in pilot clinical trial decision-making. J Offender Rehabil. 2021;60(2):138-158. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2020.1863301. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
- O'Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, McDaid D, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, Matosevic T, Harden A, Thomas J. Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2013 Nov. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK262817/
- Brown E, Males M. Does age or poverty level best predict criminal arrest and homicide rates? A preliminary investigation. Justice Policy Journal. 2011;8(1):1-30.
- Kleinman MB, Felton JW, Johnson A, Magidson JF. "I have to be around people that are doing what I'm doing": The importance of expanding the peer recovery coach role in treatment of opioid use disorder in the face of COVID-19 health disparities. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Mar;122:108182. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108182. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
- Moore KE, Siebert S, Brown G, Felton J, Johnson JE. Stressful life events among incarcerated women and men: Association with depression, loneliness, hopelessness, and suicidality. Health Justice. 2021 Aug 24;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00140-y.
- Felton JW, Hailemariam M, Richie F, Reddy MK, Edukere S, Zlotnick C, Johnson JE. Preliminary efficacy and mediators of interpersonal psychotherapy for reducing posttraumatic stress symptoms in an incarcerated population. Psychother Res. 2020 Feb;30(2):239-250. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1587192. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
- Stoddard SA, Montgomery BW, Maschino LD, et al. Establishing the Effectiveness of Enhanced Implementation Methods in Preventative Behavioral Health. medRxiv. Published online 2020.
- Hailemariam M, Felton JW, Key K, Greer D, Jefferson BL, Muhammad J, Miller R, Richie F, Robinson D, Saddler S, Spencer B, Summers M, White JMC, Johnson JE. Intersectionality, special populations, needs and suggestions: the Flint Women's study. Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jan 31;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1133-9.
- Collado A, Felton JW, Taylor H, Eure A, Yi R. Conscientiousness explains the link between childhood neglect and cigarette smoking in adults from a low-income, urban area-the differential effects of sex. Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Feb;88:152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
- Collado A, Felton JW, Taylor H, Doran K, Yi R. The Indirect Effects of Trait Anxiety on Drug Use Via Emotion Dysregulation in a Low-Income Sample. Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(8):1320-1326. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1741631. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
- DePietro A. U.S. Poverty Rate By City In 2021. Forbes. Accessed August 15, 2022. https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewdepietro/2021/11/26/us-poverty-rate-by-city-in-2021/
- U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: Detroit city, Michigan; Michigan. Accessed July 15, 2022. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/detroitcitymichigan,MI/PST045221
- Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). APA PsycTests. Published online 1996. Accessed September 29, 2021. https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ft00536-000
- Middlemass KM, Smiley C. Prisoner Reentry in the 21st Century: Critical Perspectives of Returning Home. Routledge; 2019.
- Crapanzano KA, Hammarlund R, Ahmad B, Hunsinger N, Kullar R. The association between perceived stigma and substance use disorder treatment outcomes: a review. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2018 Dec 27;10:1-12. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S183252. eCollection 2019.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2023年11月14日
初级完成 (实际的)
2024年12月31日
研究完成 (实际的)
2025年1月30日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2023年10月25日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2023年10月31日
首次发布 (实际的)
2023年11月7日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2025年3月25日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2025年2月22日
最后验证
2025年2月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.
行为、健康的临床试验
-
University of Colorado, DenverEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD); National... 和其他合作者完全的
-
Seattle Children's HospitalEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD); National... 和其他合作者尚未招聘
-
The Mediterranean Institute for the Advance of...Carlos III Health Institute; European Regional Development Fund; Andalusian Regional Ministry... 和其他合作者尚未招聘
-
Hopital MontfortChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute招聘中热应激障碍 | 初级卫生保健 | 环境暴露 | 风险降低行为 | 公共卫生 | 热暴露 | 气候变化 | 预防保健服务 (PREV HEALTH SERV) | 健康主题加拿大