Assessment of Inflammatory Mediators (AIM)

December 18, 2007 updated by: Ramsey, Bonnie, MD

Assessment of Induced Sputum as a Tool to Evaluate Anti-Inflammatory Agents in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis

Specific Aim: To determine whether neutrophils, active elastase, and cytokines measured in sputum induced using hypertonic saline are useful screening tests for determining if a particular agent with known anti-inflammatory properties is a suitable candidate for more extensive clinical trials in patients with CF. This aim will be addressed using an anti-inflammatory agent, ibuprofen, that has been shown to have clinical benefit in CF. A "no treatment" arm will be included as the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Inflammation clearly contributes to the progression of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. Anti-inflammatory therapy with alternate-day corticosteroids and twice-daily high-dose ibuprofen in patients with CF has shown clinical benefit, but adverse effects and other considerations have markedly limited their use. Therefore, alternative anti-inflammatory agents are urgently needed. Results from the clinical trials of alternate-day corticosteroids and high-dose ibuprofen in CF indicate that anti-inflammatory therapy will probably not result in improvement in pulmonary function, but will slow the rate of decline. This expectation imposes constraints on the design of studies to test new anti-inflammatory agents, requiring that they use many patients over a considerable period of time (years, rather than the months that are necessary to evaluate anti-infective or anti-obstructive therapies). Thus, it is highly desirable to design a strategy for evaluation of prospective anti-inflammatory agents that will allow for the selection of only the most promising agents for further study in Phase III type trials. Of additional concern is the fact that some pharmaceutical firms have not pursued development of anti-inflammatory agents for CF because there were no early indicators of efficacy. This presents an insurmountable hurdle for translation of research advances into clinical treatments. Some means of screening candidate drugs is urgently required. This study will assess the measurement of inflammatory mediators in induced sputum as one such strategy. The hypothesis to be tested is that ibuprofen will reduce neutrophils, active elastase, and pro-inflammatory cytokines in induced sputum after 4 weeks of therapy in patients with CF.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35223
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford University - Packard Children's Hospital
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • University of California - San Diego
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
        • University of Colorado Health Sciences Center - Children's Hospital
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Harvard University - Children's Hospital of Boston, Pulmonary Division
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University - St. Louis Children's Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Case Western Reserve University - Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205-2696
        • Columbus Children's Hospital
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine - Texas Children's Hospital
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah Health Sciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female 10 years of age or older.

  • Confirmed diagnosis of CF based on the following criteria:

    • positive sweat chloride >= 60 mEq/liter (by pilocarpine iontophoresis) and/or
    • a genotype with two identifiable mutations consistent with CF, and
    • accompanied by one or more clinical features consistent with the CF phenotype
  • FEV1 >= 50% predicted value (subjects >= 10 - <18 years of age) or >= 40% predicted value (subjects >= 18 years of age)
  • Clinically stable with no evidence of acute upper or lower respiratory tract infection or current pulmonary exacerbation within the 14 days prior to Visit 1 (Day 0)
  • Ability to reproducibly perform spirometry and peak flow measurements
  • Ability to understand and sign a written informed consent or assent and comply with the requirements of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of an investigational agent within the 4-week period prior to Visit 1 (Day 0)
  • Chronic daily use of ibuprofen, celecoxib, or other selective COX-2 inhibitors, other NSAIDs, or systemic or inhaled corticosteroids within the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (Day 0) or acute usage within 72 hours prior to Visit 1 (Day 0)
  • History of hypersensitivity to beta-agonists
  • History of hypersensitivity to sulfonamides, aspirin, or other NSAIDs
  • Oxygen saturation < 92% on room air at Visit 1 (Day 0)
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or unwilling to practice birth control during participation in the study
  • History of hemoptysis >= 30 cc per episode during the 30 days prior to Visit 1 (Day 0)
  • Significant history of hepatic, cardiovascular, renal, neurological, hematologic, or peptic ulcer disease
  • SGOT (ALT) or SGPT (AST) > 3 times the upper limit of normal at screening, documented biliary cirrhosis, or portal hypertension
  • Creatinine > 1.8 mg/dL at screening
  • Inability to swallow pills
  • Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the subject or the quality of the data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Changes in markers of inflammation in induced sputum samples: total white cell count, total neutrophil count, percent neutrophils, active elastase, and cytokines.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
(1) Alterations in laboratory evaluations: CBC, ESR, CRP, serum chemistry profile, urinalysis, and spirometry. (2) Adverse events associated with sputum induction or administration of study medications

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ramsey, Bonnie, MD

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: James Chmiel, MD, MPH, Case Western Reserve University - Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 16, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 16, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 22, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 25, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2007

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2006

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CFOM0003

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings