A Study of the Effect on Pain Control of Treatment With Fentanyl, Administered Through the Skin, Compared With Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis

May 16, 2011 updated by: Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium

Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicentre Trial To Investigate Durogesic™ In Comparison To Placebo In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Pain Induced By Osteoarthritis Of The Hip Or The Knee, Who Are In Need Of And Waiting For Hip Or Knee Replacement.

The purpose of the study is to determine if fentanyl, delivered through the skin via an adhesive patch, has a superior pain-relieving effect compared with placebo in patients with osteoarthritis pain that is inadequately controlled by therapeutic treatment with weak opioids, which are often taken in combination with non-opioid analgesics.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chronic, non-cancer pain may result from injury or illness, such as osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, which causes suffering and a reduction in the quality of life. Opioids, such as fentanyl, are beneficial as potent pain-relieving drugs in patients with continuous pain. This is double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to compare pain relief, and the effect on safety, functionality, and quality of life during treatment with fentanyl administered through the skin via adhesive patches ("transdermal system") with therapy with placebo in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Specifically, patients with moderate to severe pain induced by osteoarthritis and for whom treatment with traditional pain medication (according to the World Health Organization [WHO] pain ladder, up to and including weak opioids) has failed to provide adequate pain relief, are eligible to enroll. After screening, patients enter a 1-week Run-In period, in which prior treatment with weak opioids, with or without non-opioid pain medication, continues. After this period, patients with moderate to severe pain are randomized to the fentanyl adhesive patch or placebo during the Double-Blind (Treatment) phase for 6 weeks. All patients, including those who discontinue or withdraw from the study, enter the Tapering-Off period, during which the medication is reduced gradually. Assessments of effectiveness include: Pain relief, determined with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) by means of an electronic pain diary updated by the patient at least twice daily; functionality, assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index; and quality of life, measured by the SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire. Safety assessments include identification of possible withdrawal symptoms at the end of the Tapering-Off period, measurement of vital signs at stated intervals, and incidence of adverse events throughout the study. The study hypothesis is that patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee whose pain is not adequately controlled by other pain-relieving medications will show an improvement in pain control after treatment with the fentanyl transdermal system. Fentanyl patches to deliver 25 micrograms/hour to 100 micrograms/hour, changed every 3 days, for 6 weeks; doses may be adjusted for adequate pain control; anti-nausea tablets (Metoclopramide, 10 milligrams[mg], and paracetamol tablets (500 mg; maximum 4 grams/day) as supplementary pain control

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
418

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

41 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or the knee (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology) and radiological evidence of OA from the target joint
  • patients must be in need of and waiting for hip or knee replacement
  • patients with chronic pain for longer than 3 months for >=20 days/month
  • patients with moderate to severe OA pain of the target joint (VAS score >=50 on a scale of 0-100), whose pain was not adequately controlled with weak opioids, with or without non-opioid pain medication
  • women must be postmenopausal or using adequate contraception, have a negative pregnancy test at study initiation, and not be breastfeeding.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had previously failed fentanyl therapy or had discontinued treatment due to adverse events
  • known allergy or hypersensitivity to fentanyl or to the adhesives
  • patients being treated for depression or epilepsy
  • patients who received sedative hypnotics, anaesthetics and/or muscle relaxants in the week preceding the Run-In Period
  • patients experiencing another type of continuous pain that stands out in comparison with OA pain
  • patients with major trauma to the target joints, infection in these joints, or irreversible damage to these joints during the 6 months before the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Average Area Under the Curve Minus Baseline (AAUCMB) of pain relief, as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for daily pain during the treatment period (6 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire (QoL) and WOMAC questionnaire on Days 1 and 43 and at end of tapering-off period; adverse events throughout study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2002

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 7, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 7, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 17, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR003004

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings