Very Low Dose Oral Anticoagulation and Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications (ESCAT III)

December 10, 2013 updated by: Heart and Diabetes Center North-Rhine Westfalia

Effects of Very Low Dose Oral Anticoagulation on Thromboembolism and Bleeding Events in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement

We aim to investiagte whether very low dose self management of oral anticoagulation is superior to low dose oral anticoagulation in order to prevent bleeding events in patients undergoing mechanuical heart valve replacement.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In mechanical heart valve recipients, self-management of oral anticoagulation can reduce the risk of developing thromboembolic events and improves long-term survival compared with international normalized ratio (INR) control by a general practitioner. Low-dose INR self-management (INR values of 1.8.-2.8 for aortic valve recipients and 2.5 - 3.5 for mitral or double valve recipients) does not increase the risk of thromboembolic events compared to conventional dose INR self-management. Even in patients with a low INR target range, however, the risk of bleeding events is still higher than the risk of thromboembolism. We therefore perform a prospective, randomized trial in 1,800 patients with mechanical heart valve replacement. During the first six postoperative months, low dose INR self-management will be performed by all patients (INR measurement once a week). Thereafter, 600 patients will continue with this treatment regimen, whereas the other 1,200 patients with perform very low dose oral anticoagulation. Out of these 1,200 patients, 600 will perform INR measurement once a week and 600 patients will perform INR measurement twice a week. Patients are followed up for 24 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1571

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Bad Oeynhausen, Germany, 32545
        • Heart and Diabetes Center NRW

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mechanical heart valve recipients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contra-indication to phenprocoumon
  • Ulcerous disease with bleeding tendency,
  • Hypo- or hypercoagulability
  • Dementia
  • Missing informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: A
Low dose oral anticoagulation, INR self-management once a week
Drug: phenprocoumon
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8 - 2.8 for aortic valve recipients and 2.5 - 3.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR-self management once a week
Drug: phenprocoumon
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management once a week
Drug: phenprocoumon
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management twice a week
Active Comparator: B
very low dose oral anticoagulation, INR self-management once a week
Drug: phenprocoumon
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8 - 2.8 for aortic valve recipients and 2.5 - 3.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR-self management once a week
Drug: phenprocoumon
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management once a week
Drug: phenprocoumon
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management twice a week
Experimental: C
very low dose oral anticoagulation, INR self-management twice a week
Drug: phenprocoumon
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8 - 2.8 for aortic valve recipients and 2.5 - 3.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR-self management once a week
Drug: phenprocoumon
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management once a week
Drug: phenprocoumon
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management twice a week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Thromboembolic events, Bleeding events, Survival rates
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
INR values, Percent of INR values in the target range
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Heart and Diabetes Center North-Rhine Westfalia

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen
University of Kiel

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Heinrich Koertke, MD, Institute of Applied Telemedicine, Heart and Diabetes Center North-Rhine Westfalia, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 11, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 12, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 11, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 10, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 002 (University of CT Health Center)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Heart Valve Recipients

Clinical Trials on phenprocoumon

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings