Very Low Dose Oral Anticoagulation and Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications (ESCAT III)

Effects of Very Low Dose Oral Anticoagulation on Thromboembolism and Bleeding Events in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement

We aim to investiagte whether very low dose self management of oral anticoagulation is superior to low dose oral anticoagulation in order to prevent bleeding events in patients undergoing mechanuical heart valve replacement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In mechanical heart valve recipients, self-management of oral anticoagulation can reduce the risk of developing thromboembolic events and improves long-term survival compared with international normalized ratio (INR) control by a general practitioner. Low-dose INR self-management (INR values of 1.8.-2.8 for aortic valve recipients and 2.5 - 3.5 for mitral or double valve recipients) does not increase the risk of thromboembolic events compared to conventional dose INR self-management. Even in patients with a low INR target range, however, the risk of bleeding events is still higher than the risk of thromboembolism. We therefore perform a prospective, randomized trial in 1,800 patients with mechanical heart valve replacement. During the first six postoperative months, low dose INR self-management will be performed by all patients (INR measurement once a week). Thereafter, 600 patients will continue with this treatment regimen, whereas the other 1,200 patients with perform very low dose oral anticoagulation. Out of these 1,200 patients, 600 will perform INR measurement once a week and 600 patients will perform INR measurement twice a week. Patients are followed up for 24 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1571

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bad Oeynhausen, Germany, 32545
        • Heart and Diabetes Center NRW

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mechanical heart valve recipients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contra-indication to phenprocoumon
  • Ulcerous disease with bleeding tendency,
  • Hypo- or hypercoagulability
  • Dementia
  • Missing informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A
Low dose oral anticoagulation, INR self-management once a week
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8 - 2.8 for aortic valve recipients and 2.5 - 3.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR-self management once a week
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management once a week
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management twice a week
Active Comparator: B
very low dose oral anticoagulation, INR self-management once a week
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8 - 2.8 for aortic valve recipients and 2.5 - 3.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR-self management once a week
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management once a week
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management twice a week
Experimental: C
very low dose oral anticoagulation, INR self-management twice a week
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8 - 2.8 for aortic valve recipients and 2.5 - 3.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR-self management once a week
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management once a week
The daily phenprocoumon dose administered should achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.6-2.1 for aortic valve recipients and 2.0 - 2.5 for mitral or double valve recipients, INR self management twice a week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Thromboembolic events, Bleeding events, Survival rates
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
INR values, Percent of INR values in the target range
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heinrich Koertke, MD, Institute of Applied Telemedicine, Heart and Diabetes Center North-Rhine Westfalia, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 002 (University of CT Health Center)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Heart Valve Recipients

Clinical Trials on phenprocoumon

Subscribe