Evaluation of Chagas Blood Screening and Confirmatory Assays

March 2, 2012 updated by: Abbott Diagnostics Division

Evaluation of ABBOTT PRISM Chagas Assay and Chagas Confirmatory Assay

Protocol designed to test blood samples from blood donors of whole blood and blood components using a new investigational screening test (PRISM Chagas) that detects antibody to T. cruzi (Chagas infection). Results will be compared to the current T. cruzi antibody screening assay. Specimens positive with the screening assay will be further tested with a new investigational Chagas confirmatory assay [Enzyme Strip Assay (ESA) Chagas]. Additional specimens collected under separate protocols or sourced from suppliers will also be provided to the clinical sites for testing with PRISM Chagas assay and ESA Chagas.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
41862

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Lakeland, Florida, United States, 33805
        • BloodNet USA
      • St. Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33716
        • Florida Blood Services
    • Illinois
      • Glenview, Illinois, United States, 60025
        • LifeSource Blood Center
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28273
        • American Red Cross Charlotte NTL
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97220
        • American Red Cross
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02908
        • Rhode Island Blood Center
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78201
        • South Texas Blood and Tissue Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy donors that have consented to participate in study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1
All subjects will have their blood tested by the investigational Chagas screening assay.
Device: ABBOTT PRISM Chagas Assay and Chagas Confirmatory Assay
Test blood donor sample with ABBOTT PRISM Chagas assay. If results are reactive, donor sample will be tested with Chagas Confirmatory assay. Donors reactive with screening assay or positive with confirmatory assay will be deferred and asked to return for a follow-up blood draw.
Device: ABBOTT PRISM Chagas Assay and Chagas Confirmatory Assay
Test blood donor sample with investigational Chagas assay. If results are reactive, donor samples will be tested with Chagas confirmatory assay. Donors reactive with screening assay or positive with confirmatory assay will be deferred and asked to return for a follow-up blood draw.
Experimental: 2
Testing of blood donor samples with the investigational Chagas screening assay. Samples that test positive will be also tested with the Chagas confirmatory assay.
Device: ABBOTT PRISM Chagas Assay and Chagas Confirmatory Assay
Test blood donor sample with ABBOTT PRISM Chagas assay. If results are reactive, donor sample will be tested with Chagas Confirmatory assay. Donors reactive with screening assay or positive with confirmatory assay will be deferred and asked to return for a follow-up blood draw.
Device: ABBOTT PRISM Chagas Assay and Chagas Confirmatory Assay
Test blood donor sample with investigational Chagas assay. If results are reactive, donor samples will be tested with Chagas confirmatory assay. Donors reactive with screening assay or positive with confirmatory assay will be deferred and asked to return for a follow-up blood draw.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PRISM Chagas Specificity
Time Frame: 6 months
Total of 16,249 serum and plasma blood donor specimens tested with PRISM Chagas assay during design validation phase. Repeatedly reactive specimens were tested further with a supplemental assay [radioimmune precipitation assay (RIPA)].
6 months
PRISM Chagas Sensitivity
Time Frame: 6 months
Specimens from subjects known to be T cruzi parasite positive were tested with PRISM Chagas assay.
6 months
ESA Chagas Specificity
Time Frame: 3 months
Preselected US blood donor specimens (330) presumed T cruzi antibody negative negative that were tested only with the investigational ESA Chagas.
3 months
ESA Chagas Sensitivity
Time Frame: 3 months
Specimens from individuals known to be T cruzi parasite positive were tested with ESA Chagas assay.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PRISM Chagas Reactivity Serology Positive Specimens
Time Frame: 4 months
Total of 85 specimens from subjects from South America known to be positive for T cruzi antibodies and 202 US blood donor specimens that were repeatedly reactive on a licensed test for antibodies to T cruzi were tested with the PRISM Chagas assay and supplemental testing (RIPA).
4 months
PRISM Chagas Reactivity in Chagas Endemic Population
Time Frame: 2 months
Population of specimen collected in Chagas endemic area in South/Central America (524) were tested to demonstrate reactivity with the PRISM Chagas assay in a population with a 5% or greater prevalence of infection with T cruzi antibody. specimens tested with PRISM Chagas assay and licensed test for T cruzi antibody and if repeatedly reactive with either assay the specimens were tested with supplemental assay (RIPA). Data presented with PRISM Chagas and RIPA results.
2 months
ESA Chagas Testing of US Blood Donor Specimens Repeatedly Reactive by ABBOTT PRISM Chagas.
Time Frame: 15 months
A total of 41,760 US blood donor specimens were tested by ABBOTT PRISM Chagas. Of these specimens, 58 out of 79 specimens were T cruzi antibody repeatedly reactive by ABBOTT PRISM Chagas (26 from 16,249 donor specimens tested in design validation phase and 32 from 25,511 specimens from the Chagas extended evaluation). Donor specimens that were repeatedly reactive with the licensed T cruzi antibody assay, but PRISM Chagas nonreactive (6) and specimens PRISM Chagas grayzone negative (15) were excluded from this analysis.
15 months
ESA Chagas Sensitivity in Serologically Positive Non-US Specimens
Time Frame: 3 months
ESA Chagas Sensitivity in a non-US population was determined for the 85 out of the total 287 serologically positive specimens (202 US Serology Positive specimens were excluded). These specimens were collected from individuals positive for T cruzi antibodies based on 2 different serologic tests for antibodies to T cruzi in Argentina and were tested with ESA Chagas.
3 months
ESA Chagas Testing in Chagas Endemic Population
Time Frame: 2 months
Specimen collected in Chagas endemic areas in South or Central America (524) tested with ESA Chagas and licensed test for T cruzi antibody. Specimens repeatedly reactive with either screening assay and/or ESA Chagas positive were tested with supplemental assay (RIPA). Presentation of ESA Chagas results for 132 specimens from a Chagas endemic population that were RIPA positive.
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Abbott Diagnostics Division

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Susan Stramer, PhD, American National Red Cross
  • Principal Investigator: Sharon Gordon, LifeSource
  • Principal Investigator: Norman Kalmin, MD, South Texas Blood and Tissue Center
  • Principal Investigator: Carolyn T Young, MD, Rhode Island Blood Center
  • Principal Investigator: Deborah Williams, Florida Blood Services
  • Principal Investigator: Pauline Simmonds-Brown, Blood Net USA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 16, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 16, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 7, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 7B5-02-06P06

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings