Comparison of Patient Comfort After Two Anesthetic Protocols for Injections Into the Eye

November 19, 2012 updated by: Ninel Gregori, Miami VA Healthcare System

Clinical Comparison of Two Anesthetic Preparations for Intravitreal Injection

Patient comfort during and after eye injections will be compared after two numbing (anesthetic) protocols, an eye preparation utilizing three cotton swabs soaked in 4% lidocaine drops versus a preparation using 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary goal of this investigation is to determine the relative comfort of an intravitreal injection (same day and the next day) after a preparation utilizing three cotton swabs soaked in 4% lidocaine versus a preparation using 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel. Based on the available data, the researchers contend that a preparation based on viscous 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel, which coats the surface and remains in contact with the eye longer, may provide greater anesthesia and result in greater patient comfort than the topical 4% lidocaine, which is part of the standard preparation routinely utilized in the ophthalmology department currently. Secondary outcome measure is the intraocular pressure rise after the injection, and the authors will generate prospective data to study whether softening the eye with cotton swabs prior to the injection lowers post-injection pressure spike.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
53

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
        • Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has required repeat Ranibizumab injections and has had at least 3 injections prior to recruitment
  • Informed consent
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical need for a therapeutic ranibizumab intravitreal injection regardless of the medical indication
  • Able to understand and read English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test)
  • Mental disability
  • Prisoners
  • Patients with fluctuating or impaired decision-making capacity
  • Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures
  • Previous reaction to the same drug class

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 4% lidocaine
Eyes were anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine and then with three cotton swabs soaked in 4% liquid lidocaine applied with moderate pressure to the site of the injection inferotemporally to the limbus. Each participant was assigned to have this prep during one of the consecutive study visits if unilateral or in one eye if patient requires bilateral injections given the same day
Drug: 4% lidocaine
The eye will be topically anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine drops and 4% lidocaine drops and a 10% povidone-iodine scrub of the lids and lashes will be performed. A sterile speculum will be placed between the lids. Five percent povidone-iodine drops will then be applied over the ocular surface followed in three rounds by additional 5% povidone iodine and a sterile cotton swab soaked in sterile 4% lidocaine applied with gentle pressure to the area designated for injection in the infero-temporal quadrant.
Other Names:
  • lidocaine
Experimental: 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel
Eye was anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine and then with 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel applied to the surface of the eye. Each participant was randomly assigned to receive this preparation during one of two consecutive intravitreal injection (if unilateral disease) or in one eye if requiring bilateral injections given on the same day.
Drug: 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel
The eye will be topically anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine drops and 5% povidone iodine will be placed over the eye. Two drops of preservative-free 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel will be placed into inferior conjunctival sac. The patient will be asked to close the eye for 7 minutes. Next, a 10% povidone-iodine scrub of the lids and lashes will be performed. A sterile speculum will be placed between the lids. Five percent povidone-iodine drops will then be applied over the ocular surface and allowed to remain in contact with the eye for at least 2 minutes. The eye will then be rinsed with antibiotic drops.
Other Names:
  • Akten

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal Injection
Time Frame: immediately after injection, 1- hour later, and next day

Discomfort according to the Eye Sensation Scale: 1-none, 2- mild, 3- moderate, 4- severe, 5- extremely severe

Patient satisfaction scale: 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5= extremely satisfied
immediately after injection, 1- hour later, and next day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHg
Time Frame: immediately after injection, at 5, 10, 15 minutes
intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured immediately after the injection, and at 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the injection (until it was 30 mmHg or below). Prior to injection IOP and post-injection IOP were compared to find the IOP change after injection.
immediately after injection, at 5, 10, 15 minutes
Presence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival Hemorrhage
Time Frame: within 10 minutes of the injection

Presence of corneal staining after the injection:

  • Quadrants of fluorescein staining: 0 1 2 3 4
  • Density of staining: 0- None 1- Mild 2- Moderate 3- Severe 4- corneal abrasion

Size of subconjunctival hemorrhage:

in clock hours
within 10 minutes of the injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Miami VA Healthcare System

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Miami
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ninel Gregori, MD, Miami VA Healthcare Systems

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 16, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 20, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 00825

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings