Durability of Hypertonic Saline for Enhancing Mucociliary Clearance in Cystic Fibrosis

July 17, 2012 updated by: Scott Donaldson, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Direct measurement of mucociliary and cough clearance (MCC/CC) has been used as a biomarker in cystic fibrosis (CF). Additional knowledge of the performance of this biomarker is needed to inform exploratory clinical trial design in support of programs to develop new inhaled therapies for CF. We hypothesize that MCC/CC measurements can be used to determine the durability of action of agents like hypertonic saline (HS) which increase epithelial lining fluid height.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A reduction in epithelial lining fluid height in cystic fibrosis (CF) as a consequence of decreased function of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) chloride channel and related increased activity of the Epithelial sodium (Na) Channel (ENaC) results in impaired mucociliary clearance (MCC), mucus stasis, inflammation, infection, and ultimately progressive bronchiectasis. Inhalation of hypertonic saline (HS), through a direct osmotic effect on the airways, results in an increase in epithelial lining fluid height in vitro and an increase in MCC in vivo as measured following inhalation of a radiotracer with gamma scintigraphy (Sood, et al 2003). MCC as a biomarker is being validated in the clinic, as administration of inhaled hypertonic saline (HS) to cystic fibrosis patients results in short- and medium-term improvements in MCC (Donaldson, et al 2006), while long-term administration of HS is associated with improvements in the registration endpoints of lung function and pulmonary exacerbations (Elkins, et al 2006). Based in large part on these studies, HS has gained acceptance in the CF community, with estimates of up to 50% of patients being treated with this therapy. MCC/CC is thus an excellent choice as a Proof of Concept endpoint for exploratory clinical studies of ENaC modulators. Prior clinical experience with the ENaC blocker amiloride, which improves MCC acutely in healthy volunteers (Sood, et al 2003) but failed to improve lung function in long-term studies in CF (Pons, et al 2000), suggests that durable ENaC modulation will be required for clinical success. It is believed that modulation of ENaC for a period of at least 4 hours will be required to achieve the necessary durability. This durability should also enable twice daily dosing. For comparison we need to know the effectiveness of HS over this same period. Thus, this study is intended to assess 1) the duration of action out to 4 hours for inhaled hypertonic saline (7%) in adult CF patients and 2) the variability of MCC/CC measurements with and without HS treatment. These assessments at UNC will be compared to similar measures at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) for Novartis to determine the feasibility for future multicenter studies using MCC/CC as a primary endpoint.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27516
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gender: Male or female (non-pregnant, non-lactating)
  • Cystic fibrosis documented by a compatible clinical and radiographic presentation, and sweat chloride > 60 mEq/l or 2 disease causing CFTR mutations.

  • Severity of Disease:

    1. Must have FEV1 of greater than or equal to 50% of predicted at the screening visit.
    2. Must have an oxygen saturation of >92% on room air as determined by pulse oximetry at the screening visit.
  • Patient or legally authorized representative agrees to the patient/individual's participation in the study by signing and dating the informed consent form after the nature of the study has been fully explained and all questions have been satisfactorily answered.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable lung disease: As defined by a change in medical regimen during the preceding 2 weeks; an FEV1 >15% below recent (within 6 months) clinical measurements; or a significant new finding on chest radiograph (pneumothorax, lobar/segmental collapse) not considered a part of the usual, chronic progression of CF lung disease.
  • Patients unable or unwilling to be withdrawn from hypertonic saline therapy, dornase alfa, or N-acetylcysteine 3 days prior to and for the duration of each Baseline and Treatment Period will be excluded.
  • Patients unable to withhold use of long-acting bronchodilators (i.e., Salmeterol, Advair, Formoterol), anti-cholinergics, and vest therapy 12 hours prior to and for the duration of each treatment period.
  • Patients unable to withhold short-acting bronchodilator 6 hours prior to and for the duration of each treatment period except as prescribed by the study protocol.
  • Patients that have received an investigational drug or therapy during the preceding 30 days.
  • Patients that have had radiation exposure within the past year that would cause them to exceed Federal Regulations by participating in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Hypertonic Saline - 1 hour
sodium chloride (7%); mucociliary clearance measured 1 hour post dose
Drug: sodium chloride (7%)
4mL nebulized 7% sodium chloride
Other Names:
  • Hyper-Sal
  • Hypertonic saline (7%)
Experimental: Hypertonic Saline - 4 hours
sodium chloride (7%); mucociliary clearance measured four hours post-dose.
Drug: sodium chloride (7%)
4mL nebulized 7% sodium chloride
Other Names:
  • Hyper-Sal
  • Hypertonic saline (7%)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Average Mucociliary Clearance (0-90 Minutes) at 1 and 4 Hrs Post Dose (MCC4hr - MCCbaseline; MCC1hr - MCCbaseline)
Time Frame: 1-4 hours post-dose
Duration of action of hypertonic saline as determined by measurements of mucociliary clearance/cough clearance 4 hours post dose.
1-4 hours post-dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Johns Hopkins University
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: William Bennett, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 21, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 09-0670

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings