A Safety and Efficacy Study of JNS024 Extended Release (ER) in Japanese and Korean Patients With Chronic Malignant Tumor-Related Cancer Pain

June 22, 2017 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Controlled, Optimal Dose Titration, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Oral JNS024 Extended Release (ER) in Japanese and Korean Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Malignant Tumor Related Cancer Pain

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of R331333 (referred to as JNS024 Extended-Release (ER) or CG5503) compared with an active comparator (oxycodone Controlled Release (CR)) in Japanese and Korean patients with chronic, malignant, tumor-related cancer pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the patient nor the study staff will know the identity of the study drug assigned to each patient), multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of orally (by mouth) administered R331333 (referred to as JNS024 extended release [ER] capsules or CG5503) in dosages of 25 mg to 200 mg twice daily compared with orally administered capsules of oxycodone controlled release (CR) in dosages of 5 mg to 40 mg twice daily over 4 weeks in Japanese and Korean patients with moderate to severe chronic malignant tumor-related cancer pain who require around-the-clock opioid therapy (treatment with narcotic analgesics or pain relievers) and are dissatisfied with the pain relief they are experiencing from current treatment. The active control, oxycodone CR, is being used in this study because it is an opioid analgesic approved for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. Approximately 212 Japanese patients and approximately 100 Korean patients who meet screening criteria for the study will be enrolled in the study and will enter the titration period of the study where they will receive a starting dosage of either JNS024 ER 25 mg twice daily or oxycodone CR 5 mg twice daily. The dose of study drug for each patient will be titrated (increased) to the optimal dose until sufficient analgesia (pain relief) is achieved (ie, up to a maximum dose of JNS024 ER 200 mg twice daily or Oxycodone CR 40 mg twice daily). When the dosage of study drug is increased, the safety will be confirmed at the study visit or by telephone on the day after the dose is increased. Once an optimal dose of study drug is determined, the patient will continue to receive that dose during the maintenance period in the study. Patients will participate in the study for total of approximately 6 weeks; during this time patients will receive study drug for 4 weeks (titration and maintenance periods combined). During the study, if a patient experiences breakthrough pain (pain that occurs for short periods of time between doses of study drug), treatment with rescue medication (morphine immediate release [IR] 5 mg) will be given. In addition, patients will be allowed to continue to take stable doses of non-opioid analgesics (non-narcotic pain medications for mild to moderate pain) that they were taking at the time of study entry and may reduce the dosage or discontinue their use during the study. During the study, blood samples will be collected from patients at protocol-specified time points to determine the concentration of study drug after administration. The safety of patients will be monitored during the study by evaluating adverse events and findings from clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, vital signs measurements, and electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements reported. The primary outcome measure in the study will be the change from baseline to the last 3 days of study drug administration in the average pain intensity score using an 11 point numerical rating scale (NRS). Patients will receive R331333 (referred to as JNS024 ER or CG5503) by mouth with or without food at a starting dose of 25 mg twice daily to be increased if necessary to a maximum dose of 200 mg twice daily for a total of 4 weeks (titration and maintenance periods combined) OR double-blind oxycodone CR by mouth with or without food at a starting dose of 5 mg twice daily to be increased if necessary to a maximum dose of 40 mg twice daily for a total of 4 weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
343

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Chiba, Japan
      • Fukui, Japan
      • Fukushima, Japan
      • Fukuyama, Japan
      • Fushimi, Japan
      • Hamamatsu, Japan
      • Hirosaki, Japan
      • Hitachi, Japan
      • Itami, Japan
      • Iwakuni, Japan
      • Izumo, Japan
      • Kamogawa, Japan
      • Kanuma, Japan
      • Kobe, Japan
      • Kumagaya, Japan
      • Kumamoto, Japan
      • Kure, Japan
      • Kyoto, Japan
      • Matsumoto, Japan
      • Matsusaka, Japan
      • Miyazaki, Japan
      • Nagoya, Japan
      • Natori, Japan
      • Niigata, Japan
      • Ogori, Japan
      • Ohta, Japan
      • Okayama, Japan
      • Osaka, Japan
      • Saga, Japan
      • Saku, Japan
      • Sapporo, Japan
      • Sendai, Japan
      • Sunto, Japan
      • Takarazuka, Japan
      • Takasaki, Japan
      • Tokyo, Japan
      • Tomakomai, Japan
      • Toyama, Japan
      • Toyonaka, Japan
      • Ube, Japan
      • Yamagata, Japan
      • Yamanashi, Japan
      • Yokohama, Japan
  • Korea, Republic of
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of
      • Chungcheongbuk-Do, Korea, Republic of
      • Dae-Gu, Korea, Republic of
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
      • Deajun, Korea, Republic of
      • Gyeonggi-Do, Korea, Republic of
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of
      • Jinju-Si, Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Suwon, Korea, Republic of

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented clinical diagnosis of any type of cancer
  • Diagnosis of chronic malignant tumor-related cancer pain with an average score for pain intensity in the past 24 hours of >=4 on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) on the day of randomization (Day -1)
  • Have not received treatment with opioid analgesics within 28 days before screening (Note: codeine phosphate [<=60 mg/d] or dihydrocodeine phosphate [<=30 mg/d] for antitussive use are allowed)
  • Dissatisfied with pain relief by the current treatment and for whom the investigator or designee judges that treatment with opioid analgesics is required

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have complicated with uncontrolled/clinically significant arrhythmia
  • Have previous or concurrent presence of any disease which may develop increased intracranial pressure, disturbance of consciousness, lethargy, or respiratory problems such as traumatic encephalopathy with cerebral contusion, intracranial hematoma, disturbance of consciousness, brain tumor, cerebral infarction, transient ischemic attack, epilepsy or convulsive diseases
  • Have history of alcohol and/or drug abuse
  • Have any disease for which opioids are contraindicated such as serious respiratory depression of serious chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchial asthma attack, cardiac failure secondary to chronic pulmonary disease, paralytic ileus, status epileptics, tetanus, strychnine poisoning, acute alcohol poisoning, hypersensitivity to opium alkaloid, hemorrhagic colitis, or bacterial diarrhea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 001
R331333 (referred to as JNS024 ER or CG5503) One 25 mg to 200 mg capsule twice daily for 4 weeks.
Drug: R331333 (referred to as JNS024 ER or CG5503)
One 25 mg to 200 mg capsule twice daily for 4 weeks.
Active Comparator: 002
Oxycodone CR One 5 mg to 40 mg capsule twice daily for 4 weeks.
Drug: Oxycodone CR
One 5 mg to 40 mg capsule twice daily for 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to the Last 3 Days of Study Drug Administration (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Score for Average Pain Intensity on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Last 3 Days of Study Drug Administration (4 weeks)
The patients recorded their average pain intensity over the past 24 hours once daily in the evening and at the same time as much as possible (eg, 10:00 PM) throughout the study in response to the following question: "What has your average pain level been for the past 24 hours, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine." The score at 3 days before the completion of study drug administration was defined as the average pain intensity score averaged over the last 3 days before completion of study drug administration.
Baseline, Last 3 Days of Study Drug Administration (4 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score Categories
Time Frame: Baseline, Endpoint of the 4-week Treatment Period
The PGIC was rated by the patient and was based on the single question "Since the start of this treatment, my cancer-related pain overall is," where 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=not changed, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse.
Baseline, Endpoint of the 4-week Treatment Period
Frequency of Rescue Medication Use for the Double-blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: 4 weeks
During the study, if a patient experienced breakthrough pain (pain that occurs for short periods of time between doses of study drug), treatment with rescue medication (morphine immediate release [IR] 5 mg) was to be given. The average number of doses of Morphine IR taken per day was assessed.
4 weeks
Total Daily Dose of Rescue Medication Use for the Double-blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: 4 weeks
During the study, if a patient experienced breakthrough pain (pain that occurs for short periods of time between doses of study drug), treatment with rescue medication (morphine immediate release [IR] 5 mg) was to be given. The average total daily dose of Morphine IR taken (mg) was assessed.
4 weeks
Proportion of Patients With Various Levels of Pain Improvement (Responders)
Time Frame: Baseline, Last 3 Days of Study Drug Administration (4 weeks)
The proportion of patients with at least a 30 percentage improvement based on the percent change from baseline in Numerical Rating Scale score during the last 3 days of the double-blind treatment period.
Baseline, Last 3 Days of Study Drug Administration (4 weeks)
Proportion of Patients Entering the Maintenance Period
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Patients were eligible to formally enter the maintenance period if they had a pain intensity score of <=3 and did not take rescue medication more than twice daily while they were taking a stable regimen of study drug (6 identical consecutive doses) over a 3-day period.
4 weeks
Number of Patients Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The duration from the date of first study drug intake to treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR017188
  • JNS024ER-KAJ-C02 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings