Covered vs. Uncovered SEMS for Occluded Biliary Metal Stents

April 20, 2015 updated by: Ji Kon Ryu, Seoul National University Hospital

Re-intervention for Occluded Biliary Metal Stent in Malignant Distal Bile Duct Obstruction: a Prospective Randomized Multi-center Trial Comparing Covered and Uncovered Metal Stent

Endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) is now widely accepted as the standard intervention for the relief of obstructive jaundice in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. Although plastic stents (PSs) were developed earlier, self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are now used widely as the initial choice for ERBD in this setting, as SEMSs offer longer patency.However, SEMSs do become occluded in some patients. There are a limited number of reports on the management of occluded SEMS with various results. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of ComVi stents SEMSs with uncovered SEMS in subsequent ERBD after the occlusion of initial SEMSs.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) is the mainstay of palliative measures for alleviating obstructive jaundice secondary to advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Previous meta-analysis showed no significant difference in stent patency between covered and uncovered SEMS, which are currently available. However, information on secondary SEMS insertion is still scarce, and there has been no prospective trial comparing efficacy of secondary stenting between covered and uncovered SEMS for the management of occluded metal stent in malignant biliary obstruction. Previously, only two small retrospective studies addressed this issue. Given the absence of prospective trial on re-intervention for occluded SEMS in malignant biliary obstruction, we aimed to prospectively compare the efficacies and complication rates of secondary ComVi stent (cSEMS) and uSEMS for the management of such condition.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
43

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Seoul National University Hospital
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 410-769
        • National Cancer Center
      • Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with SEMS occlusion, which was inserted either endoscopically or percutaneously, for the relief of malignant nonhilar biliary obstruction
  • Patients in whom the above SEMS had been inserted for no less than 7 days

  • Patients with one of the following:

    1. cholangitis (as defined by fever, tenderness in the right upper quadrant or epigastrium, and/or a ≥ twofold increase in the serum bilirubin level above the baseline after initial SEMS insertion)
    2. a ≥ twofold increase in the serum bilirubin level above the baseline after initial SEMS insertion
  • Patients in whom the cause of initial ERBD occlusion was identified, such as tumor overgrowth, ingrowth, and/or sludge
  • Age ≥ 20 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Patients with sepsis and/or shock not responding to medical treatment or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 4
  • Patients with estimated survival < 4 weeks
  • Patients who had undergone curative or palliative surgical intervention
  • Hilar or perihilar biliary obstruction
  • Patients who had undergone endoscopic nasobiliary drainage,plastic stent insertion, or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage prior to second SEMS insertion
  • Covered SEMS as initial SEMS
  • Migration or food impaction as the cause of initial SEMS occlusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ComVi stent
ComVi stent (Niti-S stent, ComVi type, Taewoong Medical Inc, Korea)
Device: ComVi stent
Endoscopic insertion of ComVi stent
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Uncovered SEMS
uncovered nitinol metal stent (HANAROSTENT, M.I. Tech Co., Ltd., Korea)
Device: Uncovered SEMS
Endoscopic insertion of uncovered SEMS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The stent patency
Time Frame: up to 53 months
period between stent insertion and stent occlusion or death of the patient
up to 53 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success
Time Frame: for the duration of ERCP procedure, an expected average of 30 minutes
Technical success was achieved when the SEMS was placed across the stricture with appropriate radiographic positioning and immediate biliary decompression
for the duration of ERCP procedure, an expected average of 30 minutes
clinical success
Time Frame: within 2 weeks since initial ERBD
Clinical success was achieved in the case of ≥ 50% reduction or normalization of total bilirubin level (≤ 1.2 mg/dL)
within 2 weeks since initial ERBD
time-to-stent occlusion
Time Frame: up to 53 months
up to 53 months
patient survival
Time Frame: up to 53 months
up to 53 months
adverse events
Time Frame: within 4 weeks since initial ERBD
stent migration, bleeding, pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or cholangitis
within 4 weeks since initial ERBD

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seoul National University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ji Kon Ryu, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 21, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ERBD2SEMS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings