Safety and Efficacy Study of EXC 001 to Improve the Appearance of Scars From Prior Breast Surgery

August 12, 2021 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, WITHIN-SUBJECT CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VARIOUS DOSES AND REGIMENS OF EXC 001 FOR THE AMELIORATION OF SCARRING FOLLOWING REVISION OF SCARS FROM PRIOR BREAST SURGERY IN ADULT SUBJECTS (LEGACY EXCALIARD PROTOCOL # EXC 001-204)

The study will investigate the efficacy of various doses and regimens of EXC 001 in reducing skin scarring in subjects undergoing revision of scars from prior surgery. The study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of EXC 001 and placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
        • Skin Deep Laser Medical Spa
      • Whittier, California, United States, 90602
        • Bright Health Physicans Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
    • Florida
      • Lake Worth, Florida, United States, 33461
        • Altus Research
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33133
        • Bayside Ambulatory Center
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33146
        • Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Miami
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
        • Body Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
    • New Jersey
      • Montclair, New Jersey, United States, 07042
        • New Jersey Plastic Surgery
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Mark L. Jewell,MD Surgery Center
      • Tualatin, Oregon, United States, 97062
        • Connall Consmetic Surgery
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Endeavor Clinical Trials,P.A.
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78240-1670
        • Texas Plastic Surgery
    • Washington
      • Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States, 98043
        • BAXTER Plastic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have previous had breast surgery resulting in unacceptable scars.
  • Subject has chosen to have breast scars revised.
  • Subject must not be pregnant or lactating.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant or pregnant during the 6 months, prior to inclusion in the study or lactating.
  • Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to the start of the study.
  • Any other condition or prior therapy, which, in the opinion of the PI, would make the subject unsuitable for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group 1
Drug: EXC 001
Single-dose administered by injection four different times
Drug: EXC 001
Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1
Drug: EXC 001
Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2
Drug: EXC 001
Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Group 2
Drug: EXC 001
Single-dose administered by injection four different times
Drug: EXC 001
Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1
Drug: EXC 001
Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2
Drug: EXC 001
Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Group 3
Drug: EXC 001
Single-dose administered by injection four different times
Drug: EXC 001
Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1
Drug: EXC 001
Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2
Drug: EXC 001
Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Group 4
Drug: EXC 001
Single-dose administered by injection four different times
Drug: EXC 001
Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1
Drug: EXC 001
Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2
Drug: EXC 001
Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Physician assessment of scar was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for scar on a score of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable, where lower scores indicated better outcome. Composite score was the sum of all the scores, except the overall opinion score, and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where lower scores indicated better outcome. Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 11, 18
Physician observer scar assessment score was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for a scar on a score of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable, where lower scores indicated better outcome. Composite score was the sum of all the scores except the overall opinion score and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where lower scores indicated better outcome. Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received.
Week 11, 18
Expert Panel Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 11, 18, 24
Scar assessment by an expert panel was done on blinded photographs using 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS) where a score of 0 = best possible scar and a score of 100 = worst possible scar, where lower scores indicated better outcome. The rater first marked a rating for the "worse" scar and then rated the other scar. The difference between these two ratings was the "improvement of scar severity." If there was no difference, the expert could check a box to indicate that determination. This method provided information on the absolute severity of the scars as well as the differences between the two scars in the pair.
Week 11, 18, 24
Subject Observer Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 24
Participants rated pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and overall opinion of scar on 10-point scale. For pain and itching associated with scar: range = 1 (no, not at all) to 10 (yes, worst imaginable) and for other parameters associated with scar compared to normal skin: range = 1 (no, same as normal skin) to 10 (yes, very different). Composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion and range 6 (best) to 60 (worst). Scar appearance composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion, pain and itching, range 4 (best) to 40 (worst). Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received. A lower score indicated a better outcome.
Week 24
Number of Participants With Physician Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 24
Physician rated severity of each scar using a photonumeric guide on a scale range from 1 to 5 (where 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe). Number of participants with different ratings of scar severity were reported. Same participant was reported twice, once for each breast's scar (dosing for 1 breast = 4 times EXC 001 and for other breast = 3 times).
Week 24
Number of Participants With Participant Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 24
Participants rated severity of each scar using a photonumeric guide on a scale range from 1 to 5 (where 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe). Number of participants with different ratings of scar severity were reported. Same participant was reported twice, once for each breast's scar (dosing for 1 breast = 4 times EXC 001 and for other breast = 3 times).
Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 16, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 16, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EXC 001-204
  • B5301004 (OTHER: Alias Study Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring

Clinical Trials on EXC 001

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings