Reducing Residual Albuminuria in Subjects With Diabetes and Nephropathy With Atrasentan

August 25, 2017 updated by: AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

Reducing Residual Albuminuria in Subjects With Diabetes & Nephropathy With Atrasentan - A Phase 2b, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Safety & Efficacy in Japanese Subjects

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, 12-week, multicenter study. The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once daily administration of atrasentan tablets compared to placebo in reducing residual albuminuria in Japanese Type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy who are treated with the maximum tolerated labeled dose for hypertension of a RAS (renin angiotensin system) inhibitor.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Azumino, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 62022
      • Chiba, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 58124
      • Fujisawa, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 57486
      • Ibaraki, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 55097
      • Ina, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56982
      • Kawagoe, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 55093
      • Kawasaki, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 57485
      • Koriyama, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 55092
      • Matsumoto, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56524
      • Nagano, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 57242
      • Nagoya, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 55781
      • Nagoya-city, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60965
      • Suwa, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 55304
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59474
      • Ueda, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59967
      • Yokohama, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 55095
      • Yokohama, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 57484
      • Yokohama, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59842

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has Type 2 diabetes and has been treated with at least one anti-hyperglycemic medication within the 12 months prior to the screening period.
  • Patient is receiving a maximum tolerated labeled dose of an ACEi (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitor) or ARB (Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker)(Renin Angiotensin System (RAS) inhibitor). Estimated GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) is greater than or equal to 30 and less than or equal to 75 mL/min/1.73m2 by the CKD (chronic kidney disease)
  • Epidemiology Collaboration (EPI) formula.
  • UACR (Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio) is greater than or equal to 200 mg/g as determined by the geometric mean of the three morning void urine specimens obtained at Run-in period.
  • Serum albumin is greater than or equal to 3.0 g/dL. BNP (B-type Natriuretic Peptide) is less than or equal to 200 pg/mL.
  • SBP (Systolic Blood Pressure) is greater than or equal to 110 mmHg and less than or equal to 160 mmHg. HbA1c (Glucosylated Hemoglobin A1c) is less than or equal to 12% and serum potassium is less than or equal to 5.5 mEq/L.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a history of moderate or severe edema, facial edema unrelated to trauma, or a history of myxedema in the prior 6 months to screening.
  • Patient is receiving loop diuretics greater than or equal to 120 mg QD (Once Daily) of furosemide or greater than or equal to 3.0 mg QD (Once Daily) of bumetanide or greater than or equal to 150 mg QD (Once Daily) of ethacrynic acid or greater than or equal to 60 mg QD (Once Daily) of torasemide.
  • Patient has a documented history of Stage C or Stage D heart failure, defined ACC/AHA (American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Practice Guidelines).
  • Patient is receiving any of a combination of an ACEi (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitor) and ARB (Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker) or rosiglitazone or aliskiren or an aldosterone antagonist and patient is receiving pioglitazone and edema is present.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: ABT-627, Low dose
Drug: Atrasentan low dose group
Subjects will take two tablets daily of one of those which are atrasentan low dose, atrasentan high dose or atrasentan placebo for 12 weeks during the treatment period.
EXPERIMENTAL: ABT-627, High dose
Drug: Atrasentan high dose group
Subjects will take two tablets daily of one of those which are atrasentan low dose, atrasentan high dose or atrasentan placebo for 12 weeks during the treatment period.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: ABT-627, Placebo
Drug: Atrasentan placebo group
Subjects will take two tablets daily of one of those which are atrasentan low dose, atrasentan high dose or atrasentan placebo for 12 weeks during the treatment period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The change from baseline to each post-baseline visit in log-transformed UACR (urinary albumin to creatinine ratio)
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
Up to Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportion of subjects who have achieved at least 30% reduction on UACR (Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio) who have not had any form of treatment-emergent edema with moderate or severe severity.
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
Up to Week 12
The change from baseline to each post-baseline visit on log-transformed UACR (Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio) and estimated GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
Up to Week 12
The proportion of subjects who achieve various percent of reduction in UACR (Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio) from baseline to final
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
Up to Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Mosleh UDDIN, PharmD, Abbott Japan Co.,Ltd

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 29, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • M12-812

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Nephropathy

Clinical Trials on Atrasentan low dose group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings