Comparison of Efficacy Different Treatment Regimens in Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Lung Disease and or Hypoxia

January 28, 2013 updated by: S.K.SHARMA, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
This is an open label, randomized, interventional study indented to find the efficacy of different treatment regimens in treatment of pulmonary hypertension secondary to lung disease and/or hypoxia.This is to find out when to start combination therapy (sildenafil plus bosentan) in treatment of pulmonary hypertension secondary to lung disease and/or hypoxia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an open label, randomized, interventional study indented to find the efficacy of different treatment regimens in treatment of pulmonary hypertension secondary to lung disease and/or hypoxia. It involves 3 arms, one getting monotherapy with sildenafil for 6 months, 2nd getting bosentan monotherapy initially for 3 months and then combination of sildenafil and bosentan for 3 months, 3rd getting combination sildenafil and bosentan from the beginning for 6 months. The aim is to decide when is the best time to start combination therapy either from start or at the time of drug failure. Improvement will be assessed by change in functional class, pulmonary pressures measured by ECHO, pulmonary function test, six minute walk test and biochemical markers. Lack of randomized trials and Indian data is there on the subject. Also adverse events and serious adverse events will be closely monitored and reported to the ethics committee and DCGI immediately.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • India
    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110029
        • Recruiting
        • All India Institute of medical Sciences
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Surendra K Sharma, MD, Ph D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Pulmonary artery hypertension diagnosed by doppler echocardiography as mean pulmonary artery pressure 25 mmHg (done in department of cardiology, AIIMS)
  2. Age more than 18 years
  3. Pulmonary artery hypertension due to hypoxia, either chronic obstructive airway disease or diffuse pulmonary lung disease
  4. Willing to consent to participate in the trial
  5. WHO functional class I,II, III

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. WHO functional class IV
  2. Patient participating in any other trial
  3. Concomitant coronary artery disease
  4. Nitrate intake
  5. Liver dysfunction
  6. Pregnancy and lactation -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Monotherapy
Sildenafil will be started at 20mg OD and then increased to 20mg TDS if there is no fall in BP. Total duration is of 6 months
Drug: Sildenafil
20 mg initially and then increased to 20 mg TDS if there is no fall in BP
Active Comparator: Sequential Therapy
Bosentan will be started at 62.5mg BD for 4 weeks and then increased to 125mg BD. Sildenafil will be started be added after 3 months. Sildenafil will be started at 20mg OD and then increased to 20mg TDS if there is no fall in BP. Total duration is of 6 months. Bosentan and sildenafil will be in combination in the last 3 months. No fixed dose combination will be used.
Drug: Sildenafil
20 mg initially and then increased to 20 mg TDS if there is no fall in BP
Drug: Bosentan
Bosentan 62.5 mg BD initially for 1 month and then increased to 125 mg BD
Active Comparator: Combination therapy
Bosentan will be started at 62.5mg BD for 4 weeks and then increased to 125mg BD. Sildenafil will be started at 20mg OD and then increased to 20mg TDS if there is no fall in BP. Total duration is of 6 months. No fixed dose combination will be used.
Drug: Sildenafil
20 mg initially and then increased to 20 mg TDS if there is no fall in BP
Drug: Bosentan
Bosentan 62.5 mg BD initially for 1 month and then increased to 125 mg BD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Echocardiogram
Time Frame: 6 months
Improvement in pulmonary artery pressures
6 months
WHO functional classification
Time Frame: 6 months
Improvement in WHO functional classification
6 months
6 minute walk test
Time Frame: 6 months
Improvement in 6 minute walk test
6 months
Pulmonary function test
Time Frame: 6 months
Improvement in Pulmonary function test
6 months
Visual analog scale for dyspnea
Time Frame: 6 months
Improvement in Visual analog scale for dyspnea
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Echocardiography measuring pulmonary artery pressure
Time Frame: 3 months
Improvement in pulmonary artery pressures measured by Echocardiography
3 months
WHO functional classification
Time Frame: 3 months
Improvement in WHO functional classification
3 months
6 minute walk test
Time Frame: 3 months
Improvement in 6 minute walk test
3 months
Pulmonary function test
Time Frame: 3 months
Improvement in Pulmonary function test
3 months
Visual analog scale for dyspnea
Time Frame: 3 months
Improvement in Visual analog scale for dyspnea
3 months
Biochemical markers at 3 and 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Levels of biomarkers such as Trop T, pro-BNP, uric acid at 3 months and 6 months after starting the drugs
6 months
Monitoring side effects of the drugs
Time Frame: 6 months
adverse events and serious adverse events will be closely monitored and reported to the ethics committee and DCGI immediately
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Surendra K. Sharma, MD,Ph.D, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 7, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 7, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 10, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 29, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 28, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • pulmonary hypertension

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Lung Disease and/or Hypoxia

Clinical Trials on Sildenafil

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings