Efficacy Confirmation Study of CDP870 in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

November 12, 2024 updated by: Astellas Pharma Inc

A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of CDP870 in Patients With Early-stage Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Naïve to Methotrexate and Have Poor Prognostic Factors

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) with methotrexate (MTX) compared with MTX-alone in patients with early-stage rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are naive to MTX and have with poor prognostic factors, using inhibition of radiographically confirmed joint damage progression over a one-year period as a primary endpoint. Following a year of treatment with CZP plus MTX treatment, CZP will be discontinued, and the subjects will be monitored for one more year (the follow-up period) to investigate the sustainability of efficacy of CZP during the MTX monotherapy for exploratory purposes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study was initiated by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd and transferred to Astellas on 12/04/2012.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
319

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Chubu Region, Japan
      • Chugoku Region, Japan
      • Hokkaido Region, Japan
      • Kanto Region, Japan
      • Kinki Region, Japan
      • Kyushu Region, Japan
      • Shikoku Region, Japan
      • Tohoku Region, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with RA as defined by the ACR/EULAR criteria (2010) who meet all of the following criteria:

    1. Subjects who developed RA within one year after onset of RA.
    2. Subjects who have never received MTX before (MTX naive)
    3. Subjects whose disease activity is moderate or higher (DAS28(ESR) ≥ 3.2）
    4. Subjects must satisfy at least two of the three criteria (Anti-CCP antibody positive, Rheumatoid factor positive, Presence of X-ray erosion） for poor prognostic factors. The anti-CCP antibody positive is essential for every patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a diagnosis of any other type of inflammatory arthritis.
  • Patients who have a secondary, non-inflammatory type of arthritis.
  • Patients who have used with MTX, reflunomide, or any other biologics prior to the start of study drug administration.
  • Patients who have NYHA (New York Heart Association) Class III or IV congestive heart failure
  • Patients who currently have, or who have a history of, tuberculosis.
  • Patients who have a high risk of infection (with a current infectious disease, a chronic infectious disease, a history of serious infectious disease)
  • Patients who currently have, or have a history of, malignant tumor
  • Female patients who are breastfeeding or pregnant, who are of childbearing potential

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: PBO + MTX
Participants who received placebo subcutaneously every two weeks (Q2W) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4; followed by placebo subcutaneously Q2W from Week 6 to Week 50 and an oral dose of MTX administered from Week 0 onwards
Drug: Placebo
Subcutaneous (SC)
Drug: methotrexate (MTX)
oral
Experimental: CZP + MTX
Participants who certolizumab pegol (CZP) subcutaneously at a loading dose of CZP 400 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4; followed by a dose of CZP 200 mg subcutaneously Q2W from Week 6 to Week 50 and an oral dose of MTX administered from Week 0 onwards
Drug: methotrexate (MTX)
oral
Drug: CZP
SC
Other Names:
  • CDP870
  • Cimzia®
  • certolizumab pegol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52
Radiographs/X-rays of hands and feet (posteroanterior views of both hands and dorsoplantar views of both feet) were independently assessed by two radiographic readers. The degree of joint damage was graded by assessing bone erosion in 44 joints and joint space narrowing (JSN) in 42 joints. The bone erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (complete collapse of bone). The score for erosion ranges from 0 to 160 in the hands and from 0 to 120 in the feet (the maximum erosion score for a joint in the foot is 10). The JSN score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet. JSN, including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score of 168. The mTSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).
Baseline and Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in mTSS at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Radiographs/X-rays of hands and feet (posteroanterior views of both hands and dorsoplantar views of both feet) were independently assessed by two radiographic readers. The degree of joint damage was graded by assessing bone erosion in 44 joints and joint space narrowing (JSN) in 42 joints. The bone erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (complete collapse of bone). The score for erosion ranges from 0 to 160 in the hands and from 0 to 120 in the feet (the maximum erosion score for a joint in the foot is 10). The JSN score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet. JSN, including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score of 168. The mTSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).
Baseline and Week 24
Clinical Remission Rate: Percentage of Participants Meeting the Disease Activity Score-28 Joint Count (DAS28) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (DAS28[ESR]) Remission Criteria at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Week 24 and Week 52
The DAS28(ESR) measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: •28 tender joint count (TJC); •28 swollen joint count (SJC); •ESR; •Patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGADA). To obtain the tender joint count and swollen joint count, 28 joints of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal joints, thumb interphalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints, and knee joints were examined. DAS28(ESR) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible ESR. A participant was considered to be in remission if DAS28(ESR) <2.6. Last Observation Carried Forward" (LOCF) was applied.
Week 24 and Week 52
Clinical Remission Rate: Percentage of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)-Based Remission Criteria at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Week 24 and Week 52
The ACR/EULAR SDAI remission rate measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: •28 tender joint count (TJC); •28 swollen joint count (SJC); •Patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGADA); •Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA); •C-reactive protein (CRP) To obtain the tender joint count and swollen joint count, 28 joints of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal joints, thumb interphalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints, and knee joints were examined. A participant was considered to be in remission if SDAI ≤3.3. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was applied.
Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean-based Remission Criteria at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Week 24 and Week 52
The ACR/EULAR Boolean-based remission rate measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: •28 tender joint count (TJC); •28 swollen joint count (SJC); •Patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGADA); •C-reactive protein (CRP) To obtain the tender joint count and swollen joint count, 28 joints of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal joints, thumb interphalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints, and knee joints were examined. A participant was considered to be in remission if all the criteria for each variable was met:TJC (in 28 joints) ≤1; SJC (in 28 joints) ≤1; CRP ≤1 mg/dl; PtGADA ≤1. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was applied
Week 24 and Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Astellas Pharma Inc

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
UCB Japan Co. Ltd.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 11, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 28, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 20, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 11, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 13, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 12, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CDP870-275-11-001
  • JapicCTI-111636 (Other Identifier: JAPIC)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings