Pilot Trial Of Urinary Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) As Biomarker for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)

March 19, 2018 updated by: Timothy Boone, MD, PhD

Urinary Nerve Growth Factor as a Biomarker for Medical Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Pilot Trial

A single center, pilot trial using tamsulosin and solifenacin in 10 men with symptomatic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Subjects will be evaluated at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months for urinary NGF, urine creatinine, NGF/CR ratio and patient reported outcomes through questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Single center, pilot trial, single arm study using once daily dosing of tamsulosin and solifenacin in 10 men with symptomatic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Assessments occur at Baseline, 1 Month, 2 Month and 3 Month to evaluate: urinary NGF (pg/mL), urine creatinine (mg/dL), NGF/Cr ratio and patient reported questionnaire outcomes (AUA Symptom Score/IPSS, Patient Perception of Bladder Condition, Patient Perception of Urge Intensity 'PPIUS', LUTS Urinary Symptoms and Quality of Life). Each participant is assessed from baseline to Month 3 measurements. Protection of human subjects will be provided through the Houston Methodist Research Institute Institutional Review Board (see appendix 2). All men will receive morning dosing with Tamsulosin 0.4 mg (1 tab) and Solifenacin 5 mg (1 tab) orally at the same time.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The Methodist Hospital System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men > 45 years old with symptomatic LUTS (clinical benign prostatic hypertrophy/BPH)
  • International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) > 8
  • PSA < 10 ng/ml (negative biopsies within 6 months for any age-specific PSA elevation suspicious for prostate carcinoma)
  • Post void residual urine < 150 mls
  • Urinary Flow rate > 15 mL/sec

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Urinary tract infection, Urinary stone(s), Urinary tract tumor
  • Radiation therapy for urologic malignancy or prostate surgery; radiation to pelvic, colon, rectum, prostate, bladder, uterus or ovaries
  • Alpha blocker therapy or anticholinergic therapy within 3 months of entry or 5 alpha reductase therapy within 18 months.
  • History of cataracts with planned surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: One (single arm)
All men will receive morning dosing with Tamsulosin (Flomax) 0.4 mg (1 tab) and Solifenacin (Vesicare) 5 mg (1 tab) orally at the same time.
Drug: Tamsulosin
Alpha blocker used to in the treatment of urinary difficulties related to enlarged prostate or symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy. All men will receive Tamsulosin (Flomax®) 0.4 mg, 1 tab, per morning with Solifenacin (Vesicare®).
Other Names:
  • tamsulosin hydrochloride, tamsulosin HCl, Flomax®
Drug: Solifenacin
Antispasmodic/anticholinergic used to treat overactive bladder. All men will receive Solifenacin (Vesicare®) 5 mg, 1 tab, per morning with Tamsulosin.
Other Names:
  • solifenacin succinate, VESIcare®, Vesicare®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Urinary Nerve Growth Factor (pg/mL) at Baseline Compared to Post Dose Exposure at Mo.3/Wk12
Time Frame: Change from baseline to week 12 (3 months)
Urine sample tested for urinary Nerve Growth Factor (uNGF as measured in pg/mL), a small secreted protein in the bladder that supports bladder function regulation, at baseline (pre-dose) and week 12/Month 3 post-dose, after using daily tamsulosin and solifenacin.
Change from baseline to week 12 (3 months)
Change From Baseline in Urinary Growth Factor to Creatinine Ratio (GF/Cr)
Time Frame: change from baseline score to Month 3
The urinary growth factor (GF) to creatinine ratio may be potential biomarker for overactive bladder, based on published articles. Measuring the ratio at baseline and Month 3, comparing the difference after treatment with tamsulosin and solifenacin which may provide insight into how lower urinary tract symptoms in men progresses.
change from baseline score to Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Post Void Residual (mL) at Baseline Compared to Post Dose Exposure at Mo.1, Mo, 2, and Mo. 3/Wk12
Time Frame: Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Urine sample tested for urinary post void residual (measured in mL) at baseline (pre-dose), Month 1 and Month 2and week 12/Month 3 post-dose, post dose w/tamsulosin and solifenacin.
Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Change in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (ml/s) at Baseline Compared to Post Dose Exposure at Mo.1, Mo, 2, and Mo. 3/Wk12
Time Frame: Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Urination flow rate (measured in milliliters per second) at baseline (pre-dose), and Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3/Week 12 pose-dosing with tamsulosin and solifenacin. An average maximum urinary flow rate in males is 21 ml/sec aged 14-45 years-old and 12 ml/sec in males aged 46-65 years-old.
Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Change in IPSS-International Prostate Score Scale at Baseline Compared to Post Dose Survey at Month 1, 2, and Month 3/Week12.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
The survey, IPSS-International Prostate Score Scale, survey responses measured 0-35, is collected at baseline compared to post dose survey response at Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3/Week12 post-dose. The lower the score is indicative of less or fewer urinary symptoms while 35 is consistent with more bothersome symptoms.
Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Change in PPUS-Patient Perception of Urinary Urgency Survey Score at Baseline Compared to Post Dose Exposure at Mo.1, Mo, 2, and Mo. 3/Wk12
Time Frame: Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
The Patient Perception of Urinary Urgency self administered survey score has a maximum score 4, zero to four, for how severe a patient describes their urinary voiding frequency. Four is the most bothersome score, 0 or 1 is the least bothersome. Pre-dose / baseline score is compared at Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3, after dosing with tamsulosin and solifenacin.
Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Change in PBC-Patient Perception of Bladder Condition at Baseline Compared to Post Dose Exposure at Mo.1, Mo, 2, and Mo. 3/Wk12
Time Frame: Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Change in the Perception of Bladder through a self administered survey at baseline compared to Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3, following exposure to tamsulosin and solifenacin. The survey score measures from zero to 6, with 6 being the most bothersome bladder symptoms and 0 to 1 being the least bothersome.
Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Change in ICIQ-MLUTS - International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire for Male LUTS Baseline Compared to Post Dose Exposure at Mo.1, Mo, 2, and Mo. 3/Wk12
Time Frame: Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Measuring change in the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire for male lower urinary tract symptoms through a self administered survey at baseline compared to Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3, after exposure to tamsulosin and solifenacin. The survey score is a zero to 182 range with 182 being the most bothersome and zero to one being the least bothersome.
Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Change in ICIQ LUTS QoL -International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire LUTS Quality of Life for Male LUTS Baseline Compared to Post Dose Exposure at Mo.1, Mo, 2, and Mo. 3/Wk12
Time Frame: Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Change in the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire on lower urinary tract symptoms quality of life survey for men, self administered, compared to Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3, after exposure to tamsulosin and solifenacin. The survey scoring is zero to 182, with 182 being the most bothersome and 0 to 1 being the least bothersome.
Change from baseline to months 1, 2 and 3
Change in Urinary Nerve Growth Factor (pg/mL) at Baseline Compared to Post Dose Exposure at Mo.1/Wk4 and Mo.2/Wk8
Time Frame: Change from baseline to Mo.1/Wk4 and Mo.2/Wk8
Urine sample tested for urinary Nerve Growth Factor (uNGF as measured in pg/mL), a small secreted protein in the bladder that supports bladder function regulation, at baseline (pre-dose) compared to Month 1/Week 4 and Month 2/Week 8, post dosing with tamsulosin and solifenacin.
Change from baseline to Mo.1/Wk4 and Mo.2/Wk8
Change in Urinary Growth Factor to Creatinine Ratio (GF/Cr) From Baseline Compared to Month 1/Week4 and Month 2/Week 8.
Time Frame: change from baseline score to Mo.1/Wk4 and Mo.2/Wk8 scores
Assessing the change from baseline to Month 1/Week 4 and Month 2/Week 8, of the urinary growth factor (GF) to creatinine ratio in men, which may be potential biomarker for overactive bladder, based on published articles. Measuring the ratio at baseline compared to Month 1 and Month 2 may provide insight into how lower urinary tract symptoms in men progresses.
change from baseline score to Mo.1/Wk4 and Mo.2/Wk8 scores

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Timothy Boone, MD, PhD

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Astellas Pharma US, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Timothy Boone, MD,PhD, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 19, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00006253
  • IRB# 0711-0124 (Other Identifier: HMRI IRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Plan to share data to be determined.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Tamsulosin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings