A Phase 3 Study Of Intravenous Metronidazole For Intrabdominal Infection

December 18, 2013 updated by: Pfizer

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Unblind, Non-Comparative Study To Confirm Efficacy And Safety Of Intravenous Metronidazole In Patients With Intrabdominal Infection In Combination With Intravenous Ceftriaxone

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety in Japanese adult subjects with Intra-abdominal/Pelvic infections receiving Metronidazole IV 1,500-2,000 mg/day in combination with ceftriaxone sodium.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Kumamoto, Japan
        • National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center
    • Aichi
      • Ichinomiya, Aichi, Japan
        • Daiyukai First Hospital
    • Aomori
      • Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
        • Hirosaki National Hospital
    • Chiba-ken
      • Chiba-shi, Chiba-ken, Japan
        • National Hospital Organization Chiba Medical Center
    • Fukuoka
      • Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
        • National Hospital Organization Kokura Medical Center
    • Hiroshima
      • Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan
        • National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center
    • Ibaraki
      • Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan
        • Hitachi General Hospital
    • Kanagawa
      • Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital
    • Kumamoto
      • Koushi, Kumamoto, Japan
        • Kumamoto Saishunso National Hospital
    • Miyagi-ken
      • Sendai-shi, Miyagi-ken, Japan
        • National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center
    • Nagano
      • Iida, Nagano, Japan
        • Iida Municipal Hospital
    • Nagano-ken
      • Suzaka-shi, Nagano-ken, Japan
        • Nagano Prefectural Suzaka Hospital
    • Nagasaki
      • Ohmura, Nagasaki, Japan
        • National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center
    • Osaka
      • Kawachinagano, Osaka, Japan
        • National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center
    • Saitama
      • Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
        • Koshigaya Municipal Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 79 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 16 years of age or older.
  • Diagnosed with intra-abdominal infections or pelvic inflammatory diseases.
  • Can be obtained a specimen for bacteriological efficacy assessment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity, intolerance or contraindication to Metronidazole, Ceftriaxone sodium, or other cephem antibiotics.
  • Severe renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min.) Reference: Cockcroft-Gault calculation formula.
  • Hepatic dysfunction (AST, ALT, total bilirubin > 3 times upper limit of normal range values).
  • Severe underlying disease; patients in which drug clinical evaluation is difficult because of confounding diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Metronidazole
Metronidazole will be administered at a dose of 500 mg TID (or QID for refractory or severe infection) in combination with ceftriaxone sodium
Drug: Metronidazole
Metronidazole will be administered at a dose of 500 mg TID (or QID for refractory or severe infection) for 3 to 14 days, in principle. Treatment duration can be prolonged up to 21 days based on subject's condition.
Drug: Ceftriaxone sodium
Ceftriaxone sodium will be administered at a daily dose of 2 g (strength) when metronidazole is administered TID or at a daily dose of 4 g (strength) when metronidazole is administered QID.
Other Names:
  • ROCEPHIN

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Response: Response Rate (Data Review Committee Assessment)
Time Frame: Baseline to EOT (up to 14 days), TOC
Clinical response was evaluated by the data review committee as effective (cured or improved), ineffective (not meeting "effective" criteria), or indeterminate at the end of treatment (EOT) and the test of cure (TOC: 7 days after EOT) based on clinical symptoms, ultrasound images and necessity of other treatment. TOC was the primary analysis of this outcome measure. Cured = clinical symptoms and abnormal findings at the start of the study were disappeared and considered other antibiotics were not required during the study and after the assessment time point. Improved = clinical symptoms and abnormal findings at the start of the study were improved and considered other antibiotics were not required during the study and after the assessment time point. Response rate was calculated from the following formula; "number of participants evaluated as effective" over "total number of participants that excluding ones evaluated as indeterminate" multiplied by 100.
Baseline to EOT (up to 14 days), TOC

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Response: Response Rate (Investigator Assessment)
Time Frame: Baseline to EOT (up to 14 days), TOC
Clinical response was evaluated by the investigator as effective (cured or improved), ineffective (not meeting "effective" criteria), or indeterminate at the end of treatment (EOT) and the test of cure (TOC: 7 days after EOT) based on clinical symptoms, ultrasound images and necessity of other treatment. TOC was the primary analysis of this outcome measure. Cured = clinical symptoms and abnormal findings at the start of the study were disappeared and considered other antibiotics were not required during the study and after the assessment time point. Improved = clinical symptoms and abnormal findings at the start of the study were improved and considered other antibiotics were not required during the study and after the assessment time point. Response rate was calculated from the following formula; "number of participants evaluated as effective" over "total number of participants that excluding ones evaluated as indeterminate" multiplied by 100.
Baseline to EOT (up to 14 days), TOC
Percentage of Participants Who Was Assessed as Appropriate to Continue Treatment (Investigator Assessment)
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 4
The appropriateness of treatment continuation was evaluated on Day 4 by the investigator as continuation, discontinuation or indeterminate based on the clinical response. The percentage of participants was calculated from the following formula; "number of participants assessed as continuation" over "total number of participants that excluding ones assessed as indeterminate" multiplied by 100.
Baseline to Day 4
Bacteriological Response: Eradication Rate (Data Review Committee Assessment)
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 4, EOT (up to 14 days), TOC
Bacteriological response was evaluated as eradication (eradication, presumed eradication or colonization), persistence, or indeterminate by the data review committee, at Day 4, at the end of treatment (EOT), and the test of cure (TOC: 7 days after EOT). Eradication Rate was calculated from the following formula, "number of participants with bacteria eradication, presumed eradication or colonization" over "total number of participants that excluding ones evaluated as indeterminate" multiplied by 100.
Baseline to Day 4, EOT (up to 14 days), TOC
Bacteriological Response: Eradication Rate (Investigator Assessment)
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 4, EOT (up to 14 days), TOC
Bacteriological response was evaluated as eradication (eradication, presumed eradication or colonization), persistence, or indeterminate by the investigator at the end of treatment (EOT), and the test of cure (TOC: 7 days after EOT). Eradication Rate was calculated from the following formula, "number of participants with bacteria eradication, presumed eradication or colonization" over "total number of participants that excluding ones evaluated as indeterminate" multiplied by 100.
Baseline to Day 4, EOT (up to 14 days), TOC
Number of Participants Analyzed for Population Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Metronidazole
Time Frame: Four samples were taken at any infusion after the first dosing: during infusion, immediately after end of infusion, between 15 and 60 minutes after end of infusion, and between 2 hours and immediately before the start of the next infusion.
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of Metronidazole is conducted by combining current study data with other Metronidazole studies.
Four samples were taken at any infusion after the first dosing: during infusion, immediately after end of infusion, between 15 and 60 minutes after end of infusion, and between 2 hours and immediately before the start of the next infusion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 11, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 14, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 24, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • A6831005

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings