Vilazodone for Treatment of Geriatric Depression

April 12, 2018 updated by: Helen Lavretsky, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

A Pilot Study of Double-blind Comparison of Vilazodone to Paroxetine in Geriatric Depression

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of vilazodone for the treatment of depression in older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a 12-week double-blind comparison of a novel antidepressant, vilazodone, to the gold-standard drug, paroxetine, for the treatment of geriatric depression. We are interested in assessing the difference in response to vilazodone (VLZ) compared to paroxetine (PAR). We hope to detect difference in response in primary outcomes (depressed mood) and secondary outcomes cognition. We are seeking to examine this directly in 80 older adults (60 years of age or older) with major depression with anticipated 60 completers. This proposed trial will serve as a pilot study to estimate the efficacy and tolerability of the drug in older depressed adults, and use this project for dose-finding in this population.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
65

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Semel Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

56 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 60 years of age or older
  • The presence of a major depressive disorder diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria
  • A 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score of 17 or higher at baseline
  • Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score > 24.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be excluded if they had any current and/or lifetime history of other psychiatric disorders (except unipolar depression with or without comorbid generalized anxiety disorder), or recent unstable medical or neurological disorders; any disabilities preventing their participation in the study; diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/dementia; those with known allergic reactions to paroxetine or vilazodone.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Vilazodone; Viibryd
After screening and baseline test results are reviewed and eligibility criteria are confirmed, medications will be dispensed if patients continue to meet eligibility criteria and sign the informed consent form. All eligible subjects will be randomized to vilazodone or paroxetine group using a computer-generated random assignment scheme, which assigned subjects in a 1:1 ratio to each group. Randomization will be done prior to subject's being assigned to the groups. Doses of the drugs will be adjusted according to individual tolerability and safety.
Drug: Vilazodone; Viibryd
Subjects randomized to receive vilazodone blindly will have incremental dose titration of 10mg per day for the 1st week; 20mg per day the 2nd week; 40mg per day for the 3rd-12th week. Doses of the drugs will be adjusted according to individual tolerability and safety.
Other Names:
  • Viibryd
  • Vilazodone
  • Antidepressant
Experimental: Paroxetine; Paxil
After screening and baseline test results are reviewed and eligibility criteria are confirmed, medications will be dispensed if patients continue to meet eligibility criteria and sign the informed consent form. All eligible subjects will be randomized to vilazodone or paroxetine group using a computer-generated random assignment scheme, which assigned subjects in a 1:1 ratio to each group. Randomization will be done prior to subject's being assigned to the groups. Doses of the drugs will be adjusted according to individual tolerability and safety.
Drug: Paroxetine; Paxil
Subjects randomized to receive paroxetine blindly will have incremental dose titration of paroxetine 10mg per day for the 1st week; 20mg per day for the 2nd week; and 30mg per day for the 3rd-12 week. Doses of the drugs will be adjusted according to individual tolerability and safety.
Other Names:
  • Paxil
  • Paroxetine
  • Antidepressant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The HAMD measures the severity of depressive symptoms in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD). It is a checklist of 17 items that are ranked on a scale of 0-4 or 0-2. The range for the total score (which is the sum of the scores of all 17 items) is 0-52; a higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms.
Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UKU Side-effect Profile
Time Frame: Each visit for 12 weeks
Number of participants with each side-effect event.
Each visit for 12 weeks
Neurocognitive Measure: The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
Time Frame: Baseline and Final Visit
The The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (REY-O) is a neuropsychological assessment in which measures visual perception and long-term visual memory. Total raw scores range from 0 to 36 with higher scores representing better outcomes in recall. The total raw score represents a sum of subscales scored by 18 individual elements which are scored for both distortion and placement. Two points are awarded to elements that are accurately drawn and properly placed, one point is given to distorted or misplaced elements, 0.5 points are given if an element is both distorted and misplaced, and missing or unrecognizable elements receive zero points.
Baseline and Final Visit
Changes in Proinflammatory Gene Expression From Baseline to Final Visit (up to 12 Weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and Final Visit
Gene expression data were quantile-normalized and log2-transformed in RNA expression units. The measure included the promoter transcription factor binding motif prevalence ratio of the unit (log2 Vilazodone/Paroxetine) and ranging from a minimum of -3 to a maximum of 3 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Baseline and Final Visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, Los Angeles

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Forest Laboratories

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Helen Lavretsky, M.D., University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 31, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 12, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VII-IT-02

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings