Use of the PercSys MicroStent Device to Alleviate Ureteral Stone Symptoms and Hydronephrosis

May 3, 2018 updated by: Ben Chew, MD, University of British Columbia
Kidney stones cause severe pain. Patients with a stone lodged in the ureter (the tube that drains the bladder), require urgent treatment with a stent to relieve the blockage. This tube, or ureteral stent, gives the patient relief until they can have their stone treated. This study is to evaluate a new type of ureteral stent to relieve pain from kidney stones. This stent is designed to drain the kidney and unlike other ureteral stents, is also designed to widen the ureter to help the stone pass on its own.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This study is to evaluate a new type of ureteral stent to relieve kidney obstruction from a stone lodged in the ureter. This stent would be placed when a patient presents with pain in the Emergency Room or clinic in a patient that has no signs of infection. It is designed to continue drainage of the kidney and unlike other ureteral stents, is also designed to help dilate the ureter to facilitate spontaneous stone passage. This means the stent may also be therapeutic and the patient would be less likely to undergo another procedure to have the stone removed. Research performed at the Stone Centre at VGH shows that in ex vivo pig kidneys, this stent provides very good urinary drainage of the kidney. This has been published in a peer-reviewed journal (Lange D, Hoag NA, Poh BK, Chew BH. Drainage characteristics of the 3F MicroStent using a novel film occlusion anchoring mechanism. J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):1051-6.).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
9

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • Vancouver General Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • Stone Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, Jim Pattison Pavilion

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients that present with a unilateral, mid- or distal, ureteral stone that require stent placement to relieve stone symptoms

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Perforation of the urinary tract;
  2. Acute hemorrhage;
  3. Tissue trauma;
  4. Edema;
  5. Submucosal tunneling of guidewire or device during advancement; and

  6. Protein encrustation of the device.

    Exclusion Criteria:

  7. Infection;
  8. Hemorrhage;
  9. Complications associated with the use of anesthesia,
  10. Perforation of the urethra or bladder,
  11. Scarring or stricture of the urethra; and
  12. Urinary retention due to urethral edema.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Ureteral stone
Ten (10) patients with a unilateral, mid- or distal, ureteral (tube connecting kidney and bladder in the urinary system) stone will be enrolled and brought to completion in this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relief of hydronephrosis (fluid in kidney causing kidney swelling)
Time Frame: 1-2 weeks following stent placement
Patients will return for radiographic test(s) after the stent placement as determined by the physician which can include kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) x-ray, renal and bladder ultrasound, or CT scan. This imaging helps determine 2 things: the degree of kidney swelling (hydronephrosis), stent migration and whether their stone is still present or not.
1-2 weeks following stent placement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain relief
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 post stent placement, and days 1 and 7 post stent removal
Before stent placement the subject will complete Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire. After stent placement and discharge home study questionnaires will be completed each day at the end of the day, until stent removal which will be in approximately 7 days. Each VAS questionnaire takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. The subject will be instructed to bring these at their clinic visit for stent removal at Vancouver General Hospital. After the stent removal 2 more questionnaires are completed, at 1 day and at 7 days. These are sent back in a stamped return envelope.
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 post stent placement, and days 1 and 7 post stent removal
Migration of stent
Time Frame: 1-2 weeks following stent placement
Patients will return for radiographic test(s) after the stent placement as determined by the physician which can include kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) x-ray, renal and bladder ultrasound, or CT scan. This imaging helps determine 2 things: the degree of kidney swelling (hydronephrosis), stent migration and whether their stone is still present or not.
1-2 weeks following stent placement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of British Columbia

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Percutaneous Systems, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ben H Chew, MD, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital
  • Study Director: Ryan F Paterson, MD, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 6, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 11, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H11-00383

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings