Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment in Emphysema. (STICREVOLENS)
Cost-effectiveness of Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment in Emphysema.
- BACKGROUND: Medical therapeutic options for the treatment of emphysema remain limited. Lung volume reduction surgery is infrequently used because of its high morbi-mortality. Endobronchial lung volume reduction coil (LVRC(®), PneumRx, Mountain View, CA) treatment has been recently developed and has been shown to be feasible and associated with an acceptable safety profile, while resulting in improvements in dyspnea, exercise capacity and lung function. The objective of this study is to analyze the cost effectiveness of LVRC treatment in severe emphysema.
- METHODS:This prospective, multicenter study, randomized with a 1:1 ratio (LVRC vs conventional treatment) will include 100 patients who will be followed up for 1year. The primary outcome measure is the 6-month improvement of the 6-minute walk test: the percentage of patients showing an improvement of at least 54m will be compared between groups. A cost-effectiveness study will estimate the cost of LVRC treatment, the global cost of this therapeutic option and will compare the cost between patients treated by LVRC and by medical treatment alone.
- EXPECTED RESULTS:This study should allow validating the clinical efficacy of LVRC in severe emphysema. The cost-effectiveness study will assess the medical-economic impact of the LVRC therapeutic option.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
AMIENS Cedex 1, France, 80054
- CHU d'Amiens
-
GRENOBLE Cedex 9, France, 38043
- CHU de GRENOBLE
-
MONTPELLIER Cedex 5, France, 34295
- CHU de Montpellier
-
Marseille, France, 13015
- AP-HM
-
Nice, France, 06002
- Chu De Nice
-
PARIS Cedex 18, France, 75877
- AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat
-
ROUEN Cedex, France, 76031
- CHU de Rouen
-
STRASBOURG Cedex, France, 67091
- Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
-
Saint-priest-en-jarez, France, 42270
- CHU de Saint-Etienne
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral emphysema on Chest CT Scanner
- Post bronchodilator FEV1 < 50 %
- Total Lung Capacity > 100 %
- Residual Volume > 220 %
- Dyspnea score between 2 and 4 based on the mMRC scale
- Stopped cigarette smoking for more than 8 weeks
- Pulmonary rehabilitation within the previous twelve months
- Consent form signed
- Covered by Medical Insurance
Exclusion Criteria:
- Post bronchodilator FEV1 < 15%
- Post-bronchodilator change in FEV1 > 20%
- Severe recurrent respiratory infections requiring more than 2 hospitalization stays within the past twelve months
- COPD exacerbation requiring hospital stay within 3 months
- Pulmonary Hypertension (Pulmonary systolic pressure >50 mmHg on cardiac echo)
- Patient unable to perform a 6-min walking test in room air
- Giant bulla of more than 1/3 of the lung field on Chest CT
- Strictly homogeneous emphysema on Chest CT
- Clinically significant bronchiectasis
- Past history of lobectomy, lung volume reduction surgery, lung transplantation
- Any extrapulmonary diseases compromising survival or evaluation within the protocol (severe cardiac disease, severe renal insufficiency, cancer…)
- Lung carcinoma or pulmonary nodule on CT scan requiring Chest CT scan follow-up
- Contra-indication to general anesthesia
- Oral anticoagulant treatment (antivitamin K)
- Allergy to nitinol
- Inclusion in an other study assessing respiratory treatments
- Patient protected by the law
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Lung volume reduction coïl treatment
Lung volume reduction coïl treatment,added to usual medical treatment and follow up after the intervention
|
|
|
OTHER: Regular Medical Treatment
No intervention, just a follow up under usual medical treatment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
6-month improvement of the 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6-month improvement of the 6-minute walk test : the percentage of patients showing an improvement of at least 54m will be compared between groups.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
|
Cost utility (incremental cost effectiveness ratio) of each therapeutic option according to the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) utility scores.
|
6 and 12 months
|
|
Dyspnea
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
|
Comparison of dyspnea assessed by the mMRC scale, BDI/TDI scale and the Borg scale
|
6 and 12 months
|
|
Pulmonary function assessment
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
|
Pulmonary function tests including FEV1, FVC, RV, TLC, RV/TLC.
|
6 and 12 months
|
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
|
Comparison of the St georges questionnaire score and the EuroQoL 5D (European Quality of Life 5 dimensions)
|
6 and 12 months
|
|
Morbidity-mortality
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
|
Comparison of mortality and severe adverse events using a composite score (death, haemoptysis > 150 cc, pneumonia requiring hospitalization, pneumothorax requiring chest tube drainage > 7 days, mechanical ventilation > 24 hours, lung transplantation).
|
6 and 12 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Exercise testing
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months months
|
Comparison of the 6-min walking test between groups (using the > 25 meters change from baseline as cut-off for clinically significant change).
|
6 and 12 months months
|
|
Exercise testing
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Comparison of the 6-min walking distance at 12 months using 54 meters as cut-off for clinically significant change.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gaëtan DESLEE, PhD, MD, CHU de Reims
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Deslee G, Barbe C, Bourdin A, Durand-Zaleski I, Dutau H, Jolly D, Jounieaux V, Kessler R, Mal H, Pison C, Thiberville L, Vergnon JM, Marquette CH. [Cost-effectiveness of lung volume reduction coil treatment in emphysema. STIC REVOLENS]. Rev Mal Respir. 2012 Nov;29(9):1157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Oct 12. French.
- Perotin JM, Leroy S, Marquette CH, Mal H, Dutau H, Bourdin A, Vergnon JM, Pison C, Barbe C, Deslee G; REVOLENS Study Group. Endobronchial coil treatment in severe emphysema patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Nov 5;13:3645-3649. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S176366. eCollection 2018.
- Bulsei J, Leroy S, Perotin JM, Mal H, Marquette CH, Dutau H, Bourdin A, Vergnon JM, Pison C, Kessler R, Jounieaux V, Salaun M, Marceau A, Dukic S, Barbe C, Bonnaire M, Deslee G, Durand-Zaleski I; REVOLENS study group. Cost-effectiveness of lung volume reduction coil treatment in patients with severe emphysema: results from the 2-year follow-up crossover REVOLENS study (REVOLENS-2 study). Respir Res. 2018 May 9;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0796-x.
- Deslee G, Leroy S, Perotin JM, Mal H, Dutau H, Bourdin A, Vergnon JM, Pison C, Kessler R, Jounieaux V, Salaun M, Marceau A, Dury S, Benzaquen J, Bonnaire M, Dukic S, Barbe C, Marquette CH; , on behalf of the REVOLENS Study Group13; REVOLENS Study Group. Two-year follow-up after endobronchial coil treatment in emphysema: results from the REVOLENS study. Eur Respir J. 2017 Dec 21;50(6):1701740. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01740-2017. Print 2017 Dec. No abstract available.
- Deslee G, Mal H, Dutau H, Bourdin A, Vergnon JM, Pison C, Kessler R, Jounieaux V, Thiberville L, Leroy S, Marceau A, Laroumagne S, Mallet JP, Dukic S, Barbe C, Bulsei J, Jolly D, Durand-Zaleski I, Marquette CH; REVOLENS Study Group. Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment vs Usual Care in Patients With Severe Emphysema: The REVOLENS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):175-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.17821.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PD12133
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.