Blue Light for Treating Eczema

June 24, 2015 updated by: Philips Electronics Nederland BV

Monocenter, Randomized, Intraindividual, Open Label, Exploratory Study Comparing 4 Weeks of Treatment With 453nm Blue Light With no Treatment in Patients With Eczema

Monocenter, randomized, intraindividual, open label, exploratory study comparing 4 weeks of treatment with 453nm blue light with no treatment in patients with Eczema. Patients will be screened up to 28 days before start of treatment. During the screening visit, the purpose and procedures of the study will be explained to potential patients and informed consent will be obtained. In addition, fungal superinfection of the target area will be examined using direct preparations and mycology cultures. At the baseline visit, patients with Eczema will be determined and all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be assessed. For eligible patients, two comparable treatment areas will be randomized to treatment with blue light (target area) or to serve as untreated control area. After randomization, patients will receive treatment of the target area with 3 applications per week at the investigational site for a total treatment period of 4 weeks. During those 4 weeks, safety and effectiveness assessments will be performed at weekly intervals. After end of treatment, the patients will be followed-up for another 2 weeks. In case no full resolution of adverse events occurred at the 2 week follow-up visit, a follow-up call will be performed after another 2 weeks. Treatment responses will be photo documented

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
21

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • NRW
      • Aachen, NRW, Germany, 52074
        • Klinik for Dermatology and Allergology, medical faculty of the RWTH Aachen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed and dated informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure
  2. Good health as determined by the Investigator according to physical examination
  3. Willing and able to comply with study requirements
  4. Skin type I-IV according to Fitzpatrick
  5. Eczema, severity defined by an Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI)smaller/equal 20
  6. Comparable clinical symptomatology of both intended treatment Areas

8. Reliable method of contraception for women of childbearing potential (i.e. low failure rate less than 1% per year; e.g. oral contraceptives, intrauterine device [IUD] or transdermal contraceptive patch) 9. Willing to abstain from excessive sun / UV exposure (e.g. sunbathe, solarium) during the course of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inmates of psychiatric wards, prisons, or other state institutions
  2. Investigator or any other team member involved in the conduct of the clinical study
  3. Participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days
  4. Pregnant and lactating women
  5. Photodermatosis and/or Photosensitivity
  6. Porphyria and/or hypersensitivity to porphyrins
  7. Congenital or acquired immunodeficiency
  8. Patients with any of the following conditions present on the study areas; Malignoma of the skin or severe actinic damage of the skin, atypical naevi or signs of hyperpigmentation, precancerosis viral (e.g. herpes or varicella) lesions of the skin, fungal and bacterial skin infections, parasitic infections and atrophic skin
  9. Patients with genetic deficiencies attached with increased sensitivity to light or increased risk to dermatologic cancer (i.e. Xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne Syndrome, Bloom- Syndrome)
  10. Current diagnosis of exfoliative or toxic dermatitis.
  11. Evidence of superinfection of the intended treatment areas

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Blue light
Irradiation with PSOCT02 device emitting blue light at a wavelength of 453nm
Device: PSO-CT02 device
The PSO-CT02 device is worn on the affected skin area where it irradiates the target Eczema area for 30 minutes with blue light. A contralateral eczema area is left untreated and serves as control.
No Intervention: Control
contralateral untreated control plaque on the same patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline (Visit 2) of the Sum Score of Local Eczema Rating of the Target Area as Compared to the Control Area at End of Treatment
Time Frame: at week 4
The investigator rated the key symptoms erythema, induration/papulation/edema, excoriation, lichenification and crusts on a score of 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, and severe) with half steps allowed. A total severity score was calculated as the sum of the single symptom ratings (range 0-15 whereas 0 (best) - 15 (worst)).
at week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Week 4 of the Sum Score of Local Eczema Rating as Compared to the Control Area at End of Follow-up
Time Frame: week 6
The investigator rated the key symptoms erythema, induration/papulation/edema, excoriation, lichenification and crusts on a score of 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, and severe) with half steps allowed. A total severity score was calculated as the sum of the single symptom ratings (range 0-15 whereas 0 (best) - 15 (worst)).
week 6
Change From Baseline of Inflammation (Erythema) Evaluated by Mexameter of the Target Area as Compared to the Control Area
Time Frame: week 4, 6
Higher values describe higher erythema levels.
week 4, 6
Change From Week 4 (End of Treatment) of Inflammation (Erythema) Evaluated by Mexameter of the Target Area as Compared to the Control Area at End of Follow-up
Time Frame: week 6
Higher values describe a higher level of erythema.
week 6
Change From Baseline of Patient Rating of Itching of the Target Area as Compared to the Control Area
Time Frame: week 4, 6
patients were asked to rate itching on a VAS scale (1 no itching; 100 worst imaginable itching)
week 4, 6
Change From Week 4 (End of Treatment) of Patient Rating of Itching of the Target Area as Compared to the Control Area at End of Follow-up
Time Frame: week 6
patients were asked to rate itching on a VAS scale (1 no itching; 100 worst imaginable itching).
week 6

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hyperpigmentation - Evaluation by Mexameter
Time Frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6
Higher values describe a higher level of pigmentation.
week 0, 2, 4, 6
Adverse Events (Serious and Non-serious)
Time Frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6
week 0, 2, 4, 6
Adverse Device Events (Serious and Non-serious)
Time Frame: over 6 weeks
over 6 weeks
Device Deficiencies
Time Frame: over 6 weeks
This measure describes device deficiencies in general leading to a non functional device. No specific characteristics were assessed.
over 6 weeks
Recovery of Hyperpigmentation During Follow up Period (Compared to Last Treatment)
Time Frame: week 6
Higher values describe a higher level of pigmentation.
week 6
Number of Participants With Acceptance of Hyperpigmentation at Week 6
Time Frame: week 6
Questionaire if hyperpigmentation was acceptable if reported. Outcome was number of patients answering "yes" or "no".
week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Philips Electronics Nederland BV

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Verena von Felbert, PD Dr., Klinik for Dermatology and Allergy, medical faculty of the RWTH Aachen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 2, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 20, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EczemaCT01
  • CIV-13-08-011581 (Other Identifier: Unique identification number EUDAMED)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eczema

Clinical Trials on PSO-CT02 device

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings