Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Novel Quality of Life Tool to Assess the Treatment Satisfaction in Psoriasis Patients (PSO-TARGET)

March 18, 2024 updated by: Clinact

Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Novel Quality of Life (QoL) Tool to Assess the Treatment Satisfaction in Psoriasis Patients

The severity of psoriasis can be influenced by a great variety of factors including extent of the disease, lesions location and impact on quality of life. The current standard of care for psoriasis is focusing on the reduction of the skin symptoms as defined by the PASI, somewhat setting asides the patient's feelings in terms of which aspects of his/her life are affected by the disease. Despite the fact that multiple patient reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires are available to evaluate the impact of the disease on patients' quality of life, only few items address the subjective impact of skin disease. Among the available PROs the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is the most frequently used. It is a standardized tool designed to cover a broad range of dermatologic afflictions but lacks specificity towards the effect of psoriasis on quality of life. The DLQI is composed of ten questions grouped in 6 domains "symptoms and feelings", "daily activities", "leisure", "work/school", "personal relationships" and "treatment". Each answer is graded from 0 to 3. The DLQI score is calculated by adding the score of each question, resulting in a maximum score of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. A score higher than 10 indicates that the patient's life is being severely affected by their skin disease.

Because of its limitations, some patients cannot seem to completely restore a normal quality of life (e.g. DLQI 0-1) even though their reached a perfect PASI score (100). This phenomenon may be explained by the fact that the patient's own perception can be different from the physician's perspective and may have changed in time, between follow-ups. These are as many reasons as why it is highly difficult to accurately fathom the therapeutic expectations of the psoriasis patients. The standard tools currently in use are not able to assess the perception of the disease by the patient its evolution over time. In addition, it is widely recognized that alexithymia is more prevalent in the psoriasis patients than in the general population and patients with alexithymia appear to suffer higher psoriasis burden as they have more difficulties to express their expectations. Since patients struggle to recognize and verbalize their emotions, it can be useful and informative to offer patients a variety of verbatim in which they can identify. PSO-TARGET is an exploratory observational, non-interventional study aiming to evaluate a novel approach of assessing psoriasis patients' satisfaction towards their biologic treatment from a quality of life standpoint by using a psoriasis-specific Quality of Life assessment grid.

The aim of this exploratory study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid as part of a new approach for assessing the level of achievement of the psoriasis patient's therapeutic goal, identified by himself, after a treatment with Kyntheum®.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

143

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bruxelles, Belgium
        • Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc - UCLouvain
      • Geel, Belgium
        • Private Practice
      • Genk, Belgium
        • Private Practice
      • Kalken, Belgium
        • Private Practice
      • Lasne, Belgium
        • Centre Dermatologique du Roy
      • Maldegem, Belgium
        • Dermatology Maldegem
      • Mons, Belgium
        • CHU Ambroise Pare
      • Namur, Belgium
        • CHU UCL Namur - Sainte Elisabeth
      • Namur, Belgium
        • Private Practice
      • Waregem, Belgium
        • Private Practice
      • Auray, France
        • CHU de Rennes
      • Besançon, France
        • CHRU de Besancon - Hopital Jean Minjoz
      • Bezannes, France
        • Polyclinique de Courlancy-Bezanes
      • Boulogne-sur-Mer, France
        • Centre Hospitalier de Boulogne-sur-mer
      • Caen, France
        • CHU de Caen
      • Chalon-sur-Saône, France
        • CH William Morey
      • Corbeil-Essonnes, France
        • Nouvel Hôpital Sud Francilien
      • Montivilliers, France
        • Hopital Jacques Monod
      • Nice, France
        • Cide Azur
      • Olonne-sur-Mer, France
        • Ch Cote de Lumiere
      • Paris, France
        • Hopital Paris Saint-Joseph
      • Perpignan, France
        • CH de Perpignan
      • Poitiers, France
        • Chu de Poitiers
      • Toulon, France
        • Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte Anne
      • Toulouse, France
        • Hôpital Larrey
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
        • CHRU de NANCY - BSM BRABOIS
      • Épagny, France
        • Ch Annecy Genevois

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The safety population will comprise all included patients having received at least one dose of treatment.

The efficacy population will comprise all included patients who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The total number of patients included in the study, in each analysis population and related reasons of exclusion will be described.

The total number of patients attended each visit, number and reasons of study discontinuation will also be described.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Patient for whom the dermatologist decided to initiate a treatment by Kyntheum® according to SmPC.
  • Patient who signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vulnerable subjects according to the law;

    • pregnant, parturient or breast feeding women;
    • deprived of their freedom by administrative, medical or legal decision or who is under trusteeship/guardianship;
    • legally protected, or unable to express their consent to participate;
    • With no affiliation to a social security system;
  • Psychologically/linguistically unable to express their consent to participate
  • With an hypersensitivity to at least one of the excipients of Kyntheum®
  • Participating at the same time in another clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Included patients
Fill patient questionnaires at inclusion visit, around 3 months and 12 months
At inclusion visit, and after 3 and 12 months, the patient will fill a patient questionnaire containing DLQI and PSO-TARGET QoL grid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Level of concordance between the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid and the DLQI in assessing the impact of the treatment on the patients' quality of life.
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of patients who achieved the main treatment goal identified by the patient himself in the QoL component grid at baseline.
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
The therapeutic objective achievement is defined as "satisfied" or "very satisfied" response on 4 points Likert scale.
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
Level of concordance between the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid and the DLQI
Time Frame: At last follow up (around 52 weeks)
At last follow up (around 52 weeks)
Research of predictive factors (among baseline characteristics) of the achievement of the main treatment goal.
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
Percentage of agreement between the physician-reported and the patient-reported dimensions
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
Rate of patients having changed objective at the 1st follow-up visit
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
Percentage of patients who have maintained at 52 ± 4 weeks the level of satisfaction achieved at the 1st follow-up visit.
Time Frame: At last follow up (around 52 weeks)
At last follow up (around 52 weeks)
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)
Time Frame: at baseline
Calculation of the percentage of skin surface area affected. Estimation of how many hands surface (palm + fingers) of the patient correspond to psoriatic lesions. one hand surface is considered as 1% of total body skin surface
at baseline
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)
Time Frame: at the 1st follow-up visit ), at the 2nd follow-up visit (52 ± 4 weeks.).
Calculation of the percentage of skin surface area affected. Estimation of how many hands surface (palm + fingers) of the patient correspond to psoriatic lesions. one hand surface is considered as 1% of total body skin surface
at the 1st follow-up visit ), at the 2nd follow-up visit (52 ± 4 weeks.).
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)
Time Frame: at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks.).
Calculation of the percentage of skin surface area affected. Estimation of how many hands surface (palm + fingers) of the patient correspond to psoriatic lesions. one hand surface is considered as 1% of total body skin surface
at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks.).
Level of accordance between PASI 90/100 and the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid.
Time Frame: at baseline, at the 1st follow-up visit (12/ 16 weeks), at the 2nd follow-up visit 52 ± 4 weeks.
at baseline, at the 1st follow-up visit (12/ 16 weeks), at the 2nd follow-up visit 52 ± 4 weeks.
Level of accordance between PASI 90/100 and the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid.
Time Frame: at the 1st follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
at the 1st follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
Level of accordance between PASI 90/100 and the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid.
Time Frame: at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks)
at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks)
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI Scores)
Time Frame: at baseline
Patient questionnaire, score is calculated between 0 (worst score possible) and 30 (best score possible)
at baseline
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI Scores)
Time Frame: at the 1st follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
Patient questionnaire, score is calculated between 0 (worst score possible) and 30 (best score possible)
at the 1st follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI Scores)
Time Frame: at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks)
Patient questionnaire, score is calculated between 0 (worst score possible) and 30 (best score possible)
at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ziad Reguiai, Dr. MED, Polyclinique de Courlancy-Bezanes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 13, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PSO-TARGET

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis

Subscribe