- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04765332
Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Novel Quality of Life Tool to Assess the Treatment Satisfaction in Psoriasis Patients (PSO-TARGET)
Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Novel Quality of Life (QoL) Tool to Assess the Treatment Satisfaction in Psoriasis Patients
The severity of psoriasis can be influenced by a great variety of factors including extent of the disease, lesions location and impact on quality of life. The current standard of care for psoriasis is focusing on the reduction of the skin symptoms as defined by the PASI, somewhat setting asides the patient's feelings in terms of which aspects of his/her life are affected by the disease. Despite the fact that multiple patient reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires are available to evaluate the impact of the disease on patients' quality of life, only few items address the subjective impact of skin disease. Among the available PROs the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is the most frequently used. It is a standardized tool designed to cover a broad range of dermatologic afflictions but lacks specificity towards the effect of psoriasis on quality of life. The DLQI is composed of ten questions grouped in 6 domains "symptoms and feelings", "daily activities", "leisure", "work/school", "personal relationships" and "treatment". Each answer is graded from 0 to 3. The DLQI score is calculated by adding the score of each question, resulting in a maximum score of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. A score higher than 10 indicates that the patient's life is being severely affected by their skin disease.
Because of its limitations, some patients cannot seem to completely restore a normal quality of life (e.g. DLQI 0-1) even though their reached a perfect PASI score (100). This phenomenon may be explained by the fact that the patient's own perception can be different from the physician's perspective and may have changed in time, between follow-ups. These are as many reasons as why it is highly difficult to accurately fathom the therapeutic expectations of the psoriasis patients. The standard tools currently in use are not able to assess the perception of the disease by the patient its evolution over time. In addition, it is widely recognized that alexithymia is more prevalent in the psoriasis patients than in the general population and patients with alexithymia appear to suffer higher psoriasis burden as they have more difficulties to express their expectations. Since patients struggle to recognize and verbalize their emotions, it can be useful and informative to offer patients a variety of verbatim in which they can identify. PSO-TARGET is an exploratory observational, non-interventional study aiming to evaluate a novel approach of assessing psoriasis patients' satisfaction towards their biologic treatment from a quality of life standpoint by using a psoriasis-specific Quality of Life assessment grid.
The aim of this exploratory study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid as part of a new approach for assessing the level of achievement of the psoriasis patient's therapeutic goal, identified by himself, after a treatment with Kyntheum®.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bruxelles, Belgium
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc - UCLouvain
-
Geel, Belgium
- Private Practice
-
Genk, Belgium
- Private Practice
-
Kalken, Belgium
- Private Practice
-
Lasne, Belgium
- Centre Dermatologique du Roy
-
Maldegem, Belgium
- Dermatology Maldegem
-
Mons, Belgium
- CHU Ambroise Pare
-
Namur, Belgium
- CHU UCL Namur - Sainte Elisabeth
-
Namur, Belgium
- Private Practice
-
Waregem, Belgium
- Private Practice
-
-
-
-
-
Auray, France
- CHU de Rennes
-
Besançon, France
- CHRU de Besancon - Hopital Jean Minjoz
-
Bezannes, France
- Polyclinique de Courlancy-Bezanes
-
Boulogne-sur-Mer, France
- Centre Hospitalier de Boulogne-sur-mer
-
Caen, France
- CHU de Caen
-
Chalon-sur-Saône, France
- CH William Morey
-
Corbeil-Essonnes, France
- Nouvel Hôpital Sud Francilien
-
Montivilliers, France
- Hopital Jacques Monod
-
Nice, France
- Cide Azur
-
Olonne-sur-Mer, France
- Ch Cote de Lumiere
-
Paris, France
- Hopital Paris Saint-Joseph
-
Perpignan, France
- CH de Perpignan
-
Poitiers, France
- Chu de Poitiers
-
Toulon, France
- Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte Anne
-
Toulouse, France
- Hôpital Larrey
-
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- CHRU de NANCY - BSM BRABOIS
-
Épagny, France
- Ch Annecy Genevois
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
The safety population will comprise all included patients having received at least one dose of treatment.
The efficacy population will comprise all included patients who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The total number of patients included in the study, in each analysis population and related reasons of exclusion will be described.
The total number of patients attended each visit, number and reasons of study discontinuation will also be described.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 18 years
- Patient for whom the dermatologist decided to initiate a treatment by Kyntheum® according to SmPC.
- Patient who signed an informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Vulnerable subjects according to the law;
- pregnant, parturient or breast feeding women;
- deprived of their freedom by administrative, medical or legal decision or who is under trusteeship/guardianship;
- legally protected, or unable to express their consent to participate;
- With no affiliation to a social security system;
- Psychologically/linguistically unable to express their consent to participate
- With an hypersensitivity to at least one of the excipients of Kyntheum®
- Participating at the same time in another clinical trial
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Included patients
Fill patient questionnaires at inclusion visit, around 3 months and 12 months
|
At inclusion visit, and after 3 and 12 months, the patient will fill a patient questionnaire containing DLQI and PSO-TARGET QoL grid
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Level of concordance between the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid and the DLQI in assessing the impact of the treatment on the patients' quality of life.
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The percentage of patients who achieved the main treatment goal identified by the patient himself in the QoL component grid at baseline.
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
The therapeutic objective achievement is defined as "satisfied" or "very satisfied" response on 4 points Likert scale.
|
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
|
Level of concordance between the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid and the DLQI
Time Frame: At last follow up (around 52 weeks)
|
At last follow up (around 52 weeks)
|
|
|
Research of predictive factors (among baseline characteristics) of the achievement of the main treatment goal.
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
|
|
Percentage of agreement between the physician-reported and the patient-reported dimensions
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
|
|
Rate of patients having changed objective at the 1st follow-up visit
Time Frame: At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
At first follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
|
|
Percentage of patients who have maintained at 52 ± 4 weeks the level of satisfaction achieved at the 1st follow-up visit.
Time Frame: At last follow up (around 52 weeks)
|
At last follow up (around 52 weeks)
|
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)
Time Frame: at baseline
|
Calculation of the percentage of skin surface area affected.
Estimation of how many hands surface (palm + fingers) of the patient correspond to psoriatic lesions.
one hand surface is considered as 1% of total body skin surface
|
at baseline
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)
Time Frame: at the 1st follow-up visit ), at the 2nd follow-up visit (52 ± 4 weeks.).
|
Calculation of the percentage of skin surface area affected.
Estimation of how many hands surface (palm + fingers) of the patient correspond to psoriatic lesions.
one hand surface is considered as 1% of total body skin surface
|
at the 1st follow-up visit ), at the 2nd follow-up visit (52 ± 4 weeks.).
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)
Time Frame: at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks.).
|
Calculation of the percentage of skin surface area affected.
Estimation of how many hands surface (palm + fingers) of the patient correspond to psoriatic lesions.
one hand surface is considered as 1% of total body skin surface
|
at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks.).
|
|
Level of accordance between PASI 90/100 and the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid.
Time Frame: at baseline, at the 1st follow-up visit (12/ 16 weeks), at the 2nd follow-up visit 52 ± 4 weeks.
|
at baseline, at the 1st follow-up visit (12/ 16 weeks), at the 2nd follow-up visit 52 ± 4 weeks.
|
|
|
Level of accordance between PASI 90/100 and the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid.
Time Frame: at the 1st follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
at the 1st follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
|
|
Level of accordance between PASI 90/100 and the satisfaction level in regard to the therapeutic objective set by the PSO-TARGET QoL Component grid.
Time Frame: at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks)
|
at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks)
|
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI Scores)
Time Frame: at baseline
|
Patient questionnaire, score is calculated between 0 (worst score possible) and 30 (best score possible)
|
at baseline
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI Scores)
Time Frame: at the 1st follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
Patient questionnaire, score is calculated between 0 (worst score possible) and 30 (best score possible)
|
at the 1st follow-up visit (around 12 weeks)
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI Scores)
Time Frame: at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks)
|
Patient questionnaire, score is calculated between 0 (worst score possible) and 30 (best score possible)
|
at the 2nd follow-up visit (around 52 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ziad Reguiai, Dr. MED, Polyclinique de Courlancy-Bezanes
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PSO-TARGET
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Psoriasis
-
ProgenaBiomeWithdrawnPsoriasis | Psoriasis Vulgaris | Psoriasis of Scalp | Psoriatic Plaque | Psoriasis Universalis | Psoriasis Face | Psoriasis Nail | Psoriasis Diffusa | Psoriasis Punctata | Psoriasis Palmaris | Psoriasis Circinata | Psoriasis Annularis | Psoriasis Genital | Psoriasis GeographicaUnited States
-
Clin4allActive, not recruitingPsoriasis of Scalp | Psoriasis Nail | Psoriasis Palmaris | Psoriasis Genital | Psoriasis PlantarisFrance
-
Alumis IncActive, not recruitingPsoriasis | Plaque Psoriasis | Psoriasis (PsO) | Moderate Psoriasis | Severe PsoriasisUnited States, Canada, Australia, Germany, Spain, Hungary, Japan, Bulgaria, Poland, Czechia, Estonia, Latvia, Puerto Rico, Portugal, South Korea, France
-
Innovaderm Research Inc.CompletedScalp Psoriasis | Pustular Palmo-plantar Psoriasis | Non-pustular Palmo-plantar Psoriasis | Elbow Psoriasis | Lower Leg PsoriasisCanada
-
Caja Costarricense de Seguro SocialNot yet recruitingPsoriasis | Psoriasis (PsO) | Psoriasis Arthritis | Psoriasis PatientsCosta Rica
-
Centre of Evidence of the French Society of DermatologyRecruitingPsoriasis | Psoriasis Vulgaris | Psoriasis of Scalp | Psoriatic Plaque | Psoriasis Universalis | Psoriasis Palmaris | Psoriatic Erythroderma | Psoriatic Nail | Psoriasis Guttate | Psoriasis Inverse | Psoriasis PustularFrance
-
AmgenCompletedPsoriasis-Type Psoriasis | Plaque-Type PsoriasisUnited States
-
UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.CompletedModerate to Severe Psoriasis | Generalized Pustular Psoriasis and Erythrodermic PsoriasisJapan
-
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.Active, not recruitingGeneralized Pustular Psoriasis | Erythrodermic PsoriasisJapan
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedGeneralized Pustular Psoriasis | Erythrodermic PsoriasisJapan