Optimizing Plyometric Training for Functional Recovery Post-ACL Reconstruction
While surgical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) of the knee restores passive stability, studies are showing consistently poor long-term outcomes. Unusually high risks of early-onset osteoarthritis and re-injury, and low rate of return to sport following ACLR all seem to be related to a chronic tendency to land stiff-legged from a jump or hop, which itself may be due to fear of re-injury. Decreased knee bending for force absorption simultaneously decreases performance level and increases risk for injury and arthritic changes.
The purpose of the proposed study is to compare a current best-practice plyometric training program to one utilizing body weight support to increase repetition and improve performance in the initial phases. The investigators hypothesize that we will see larger improvements in absorptive capacity of the knee and better confidence in activity immediately following body weight support training, as well as improved retention of training effects after a two-month period.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Montana
-
Missoula, Montana, United States, 59812
- University of Montana, Movement Science Laboratory
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- speak and understand English
- age between 12-35 years
- unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 6-48 months prior
- activity level greater than or equal to level 5 on the Tegner Activity Scale
Exclusion Criteria:
- Weight in excess of 300 pounds (136 kg)
- contralateral/bilateral ACL reconstruction or an unreconstructed ACL injury
- history of a posterior cruciate ligament injury
- lower extremity of back injury or other condition (e.g. cerebral palsy) that has limited their normal activities of daily living within the last 6 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard Plyometric Training
Participants will undergo treatment 2 times a week for 8 weeks with plyometric exercises deemed to be consistent with best practice delivered at a standard dosage of sets and repetitions.
|
Participants will undergo individualized practice exercises of jumping, hopping, and cutting tasks consistent with standard published exercises.
|
|
Experimental: Plyometric Training with BWS
Participants will undergo treatment 2 times a week for 8 weeks with plyometric exercises deemed to be consistent with best practice with a treatment volume of sets and repetitions that exceeds standard practice.
Higher number of practice trials will be completed with body weight support (BWS) to reduce load.
Participants will start at 30 percent of body weight and will be slowly weaned away over time.
|
Participants will undergo individualized practice exercises of jumping, hopping, and cutting tasks consistent with standard published exercises while their body weight is supported via adjustable harness.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change in sagittal plane knee kinetics and kinematics
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
|
Change in psychological readiness for sports activities via survey scores
Time Frame: baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
|
Change in motor patterning via electromyography of quadriceps and hamstring muscles
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Retention of Biomechanical Adaptions in Knee kinetics and kinematics
Time Frame: Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
|
Retention of adaptations in Psychological Readiness for Sport via survey
Time Frame: Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
|
Retention of adaptations in motor patterning via electromyography
Time Frame: Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ryan L Mizner, PT, PhD, University of Montana
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UM IRB 282-13
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
-
NCT06357091RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
-
NCT05328544RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament Injury
-
NCT07448064CompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation
-
NCT03770806CompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | ACL Injury | ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
-
NCT07564336CompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Knee Instability | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure
-
NCT07322497Not yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Rupture
-
NCT02010125CompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate Ligament
-
NCT05579067RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament Injury
-
NCT02292004Active, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
-
NCT07475351RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction
Clinical Trials on Standard Plyometric Training
-
NCT05302102Completed
-
NCT07489404CompletedLower Limb Injuries
-
NCT06509672RecruitingHockey | Plyometric Exercise | Endurance Training
-
NCT06431230Active, not recruitingPhysical Activity | Blood Pressure | Cardiorespiratory Fitness | Adipose Tissue | Adolescents
-
NCT05559216CompletedProprioception | Plyometric Exercise | Upper Quarter y Balance Test | The Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test
-
NCT02802800Completed
-
NCT07352319CompletedAthletes | Rhabdomyolysis | Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage
-
NCT07443007CompletedBurn | Pediatric Burns | Burn Rehabilitation
-
NCT06108986RecruitingHigh-Intensity Interval Training | Plyometric Exercise | Martial Arts