Retrospective / Prospective Clinical Study of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lenses

May 31, 2018 updated by: Alcon Research
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety and effectiveness of the ACRYSOF IQ ReSTOR +2.5 diopter (D) Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) in subjects at least 3 months and no more than 14 months after IOL implantation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a retrospective and prospective clinical study comprised of a retrospective chart review for preoperative, surgical and early postoperative data, and a prospective postoperative visit conducted at least 3 months but not more than 14 months after IOL implantation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must sign an informed consent form and be willing to come in for a visit at least 3 months and not more than 14 months after IOL implantation with the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal Toric IOL (Models SV25T2, SV25T3, SV25T4 and SV25T5);
  • Must be implanted with the correct lens based on preoperative corneal astigmatism as specified in the protocol;
  • Must complete a visit within 10 days after IOL implantation;
  • Successful capsular bag implantation with no surgical complications;
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • IOL implanted prior to the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal Toric IOL;
  • Ocular or intraocular infection or inflammation at the time of the preoperative visit;
  • Any ocular surgery or intraocular laser procedure at or prior to the surgical visit;
  • Any conditions affecting the cornea (eg. corneal dystrophy, severe dry eye) at the preoperative visit;
  • Retinal conditions (e.g. degenerative retinal conditions, history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy) at the preoperative visit;
  • Known history of Type 1 or 2 diabetes for more than 5 years;
  • Any ocular or systemic co-morbidity at the preoperative visit;
  • Pregnant at the preoperative visit or at the time of Postoperative Visit 2;
  • Preoperative corneal astigmatism ≤ 0.50 D;
  • Participation in another clinical study at the preoperative visit or at the time of the final study visit;
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ReSTOR Toric +2.5
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal Toric IOL previously implanted during cataract surgery
Device: AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal Toric IOL
Multifocal IOL with extended secondary focal point and astigmatism correction implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient
Other Names:
  • Model SV25T2
  • Model SV25T3
  • Model SV25T4
  • Model SV25T5

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Percent Reduction in Cylinder
Time Frame: Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Manifest refraction cylinder was measured monocularly (each eye separately) with best correction (phoropter or trial lenses) under photopic (well-lit) lighting conditions using a 100% contrast ETDRS chart at 4 meters (m) from the subject. Percent reduction in cylinder was calculated as the difference between the postoperative magnitude of manifest refractive cylinder and the preoperative magnitude of keratometric cylinder divided by the intended reduction in cylinder [defined as the difference between the intended (from toric calculator) magnitude of the postoperative manifest refractive cylinder and the preoperative keratometric cylinder], multiplied by 100%. One eye (primary eye) contributed to the analysis.
Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Percentage of Subjects With Manifest Refraction Cylinder ≤ 0.50 D
Time Frame: Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Manifest refraction cylinder was measured monocularly with best correction under photopic lighting conditions using a 100% contrast ETDRS chart at 4 m from the subject. One eye (primary eye) contributed to the analysis.
Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Percentage of Subjects (With Preoperative Astigmatism > 1.00 D) With Manifest Refraction Cylinder ≤ 1.00 D
Time Frame: Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Manifest refraction cylinder was measured monocularly with best correction under photopic lighting conditions using a 100% contrast ETDRS chart at 4 m from the subject. One eye (primary eye) contributed to the analysis.
Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Visual Acuity (VA) was tested monocularly without visual correction under photopic (well-lit) conditions using a 100% contrast ETDRS chart positioned 4 m from the subject. A +0.25 D spherical power additional lens was used to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity. One eye (primary eye) contributed to the analysis.
Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Mean Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
VA was tested monocularly without visual correction under photopic lighting conditions using a 100% contrast near ETDRS chart set at 40 cm on the nearpoint rod of the phoropter. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity. One eye (primary eye) contributed to the analysis.
Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Mean Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
VA was tested monocularly without visual correction under photopic lighting conditions using a 100% contrast near ETDRS chart set at 53 cm on the nearpoint rod of the phoropter. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity. One eye (primary eye) contributed to the analysis.
Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)
Time Frame: Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
VA was tested monocularly with best correction under photopic lighting conditions using a 100% contrast ETDRS chart at 4 m away from the subject. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity. One eye (primary eye) contributed to the analysis.
Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Mean IOL Rotation
Time Frame: Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)
Lens axis orientation (position of the lens within the capsular bag) as indicated by indentations on the IOL was assessed during slit lamp examination. IOL rotation (the difference between the achieved lens axis orientation at visit and achieved axis placement at surgery) was measured in degrees. One eye (primary eye) contributed to the analysis.
Preoperative and Postoperative Visit (3 to 14 months after IOL implantation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Alcon Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Clinical Manager, GCRA, Surgical, Alcon Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 21, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 22, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 22, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 31, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • C-14-005

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings