A Novel Objective Diagnostic Test for Otitis Media With Effusion

July 1, 2014 updated by: Nazan Degirmenci

RGB Measurements as a Novel Objective Diagnostic Test for Otitis Media With Effusion

Otitis media with effusion (OME) cases refer to a clinically silent condition. Otoscopic findings are subjective and not always reliable. As an objective test tympanometric evaluation is imperfect for diagnosis of OME. The objective of our study was to investigate, in OME cases, the correlation of tympanic membrane color changes with the presence and viscosity of effusion in the middle ear. The study aimed to provide objective diagnostic and therapeutic criteria for patients scheduled for surgery by 2 means: measuring the viscosity of the fluid and evaluating color changes objectively with red-green-blue (RGB) measurements.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Endoscopic images of the tympanic membranes of 52 patients (Group 1) and 52 healthy controls (Group 2) were taken during their otologic examinations. All patients in Group 1 had hearing loss and were diagnosed with OME after audiological evaluation. Specific points were designated at certain areas on each tympanic membrane, and RGB values of those specific points were measured on the tympanic membrane images of both groups. Additionally, in Group 1 viscosity of each effusion taken by paracentesis during surgery was also measured intraoperatively with a viscometer. Patients with viscosity values lower than 450 cP (centipoise) were subdivided into Group 1a, and those with values higher than 450 cP into Group 1b.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
52

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Fatih
      • Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey, 34093
        • Bezmialem Vakif University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Endoscopic images of the tympanic membranes of 52 patients (Group 1) and 52 healthy controls (Group 2) were taken during their otologic examinations. RGB values of specific points were measured on the tympanic membrane images of both groups. Additionally, in Group 1 viscosity of each effusion taken by paracentesis during surgery was also measured intraoperatively with a viscometer. Patients with viscosity values lower than 450 cP (centipoise) were subdivided into Group 1a, and those with values higher than 450 cP into Group 1b.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with OME, that had endoscopic-otoscopic examination findings and type-B tympanograms.
  • They were all scheduled for ventilation tube insertion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting with acute otitis media, tympanosclerotic plaques, mental retardation, and children who were difficult to cooperate with.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Group 1
All Group 1 patients were diagnosed with OME, diagnoses made by endoscopic-otoscopic examination findings and type-B tympanograms. They were all scheduled for ventilation tube insertion. Diagnosis of OME was confirmed during this surgery. All patients were examined by 4 mm 0-degree Storz endoscope and light source. The Adobe Photoshop Elements 7.0 program was used for RGB measurements. Viscosity was measured by the Brookfield DV-II+ProCP Viscometer.
Other: RGB
When a circular area of 30 surrounding pixels are placed exactly upon the above-mentioned standardized points, the Adobe Photoshop Elements 7.0 program automatically measures the numerical values of the RGB color components in that area. The RGB values of the same points on the tympanic membrane images of the two groups were obtained and compared. Diagnostic significance of objectively assessed color changes at the tympanic membrane in OME patients was evaluated.
Group 2
Children in Group 2 had totally normal tympanic membranes and type A tympanograms. They had no hearing loss, Eustachian tube dysfunction, or any other ear-related problem, and were included in the study as healthy controls. Excluded from the study were patients presenting with acute otitis media, tympanosclerotic plaques, mental retardation, and children who were difficult to cooperate with. All subjects were examined by 4 mm 0-degree Storz endoscope and light source. The Adobe Photoshop Elements 7.0 program was used for RGB measurements.
Other: RGB
When a circular area of 30 surrounding pixels are placed exactly upon the above-mentioned standardized points, the Adobe Photoshop Elements 7.0 program automatically measures the numerical values of the RGB color components in that area. The RGB values of the same points on the tympanic membrane images of the two groups were obtained and compared. Diagnostic significance of objectively assessed color changes at the tympanic membrane in OME patients was evaluated.
Group 1a
To determine whether higher or lower viscosity of an effusion impacted RGB values, the patient group was subdivided into two subgroups according to viscosity level. Patients with an effusion below the mean viscosity value of 450 cP (centipoise) were assigned to Group 1a.
Other: RGB
When a circular area of 30 surrounding pixels are placed exactly upon the above-mentioned standardized points, the Adobe Photoshop Elements 7.0 program automatically measures the numerical values of the RGB color components in that area. The RGB values of the same points on the tympanic membrane images of the two groups were obtained and compared. Diagnostic significance of objectively assessed color changes at the tympanic membrane in OME patients was evaluated.
Group 1b
To determine whether higher or lower viscosity of an effusion impacted RGB values, the patient group was subdivided into two subgroups according to viscosity level. Patients with an effusion above the mean viscosity value of 450 cP (centipoise) were assigned to Group 1b.
Other: RGB
When a circular area of 30 surrounding pixels are placed exactly upon the above-mentioned standardized points, the Adobe Photoshop Elements 7.0 program automatically measures the numerical values of the RGB color components in that area. The RGB values of the same points on the tympanic membrane images of the two groups were obtained and compared. Diagnostic significance of objectively assessed color changes at the tympanic membrane in OME patients was evaluated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean RGB values
Time Frame: January-May 2013 (5 months)
January-May 2013 (5 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nazan Degirmenci

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Selahattin TUGRUL, Bezmialem Vakif University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B.30.2.BAV.0.05.05/467 (Other Identifier: Bezmialem Vakif University)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings