Kinematic Analysis: Posterior Stabilized, Fixed Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty With Attune Knee System

October 8, 2019 updated by: Richard Komistek, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Kinematic Analysis: Posterior Stabilized, Fixed Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

A better understanding of knee joint kinematics is important to explain the premature polyethylene wear failures within total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and to help design a prosthesis that most closely approximates the normal knee. Specifically, posterior stabilizing (PS) knees have been found to be associated with lower amounts of posterior femoral rollback, higher occurrence of reverse axial rotation and increased amount of condylar lift-off. The DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction's Attune PS fixed bearing (FB) knee system has incorporated subtle changes in its design to address restoration of kinematics that more closely resemble those of a normal knee. To understand if this design is able to effectively restore kinematics in the implanted knee, further in vivo analysis is necessary. This pilot study will analyze 5 subjects with the Attune PS FB 3 months post-operatively using the University of Tennessee's mobile fluoroscopy unit while performing three daily activities, level walking, ramp down and deep knee bend. Since this is a pilot study, there is no hypothesis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • OrthoCarolina Research Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37996
        • The University of Tennessee

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients will have been implanted with the DePuy Attune PS FB knee system by Dr. Thomas Fehring of OrthoCarolina, PA in Charlotte, NC.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least three (3) months post-operative with no other surgical procedures conducted within the past six months
  • Between 30-80 years of age
  • Body weight of less than 280 lbs
  • Must be between 160cm (5'3) and 193cm (6'4) tall
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) >18.5 and <35
  • Judged clinically successful with a Knee Society score (KSS) of greater than 80
  • Have good-to-excellent post-operative passive flexion with no ligamentous laxity or pain
  • Must be able to walk on level ground without aid of any kind, perform a ramp descent, and a deep knee bend (DKB), all without assistance
  • Will have a DePuy Attune PS TKA
  • Must be willing to sign the Informed Consent (IC) and HIPAA forms to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

- Pregnant or potentially pregnant females will be excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
DePuy Attune PS FB TKA
Individuals implanted with the DePuy Attune posterior stabilizing fixed bearing knee system implanted by a single surgeon at least three months post-operative.
Device: DePuy Attune posterior stabilizing fixed bearing knee system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Translation and Lift-off for Deep Knee Bend
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
Amount of translation and lift-off for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during deep knee bend activity.
3 months post-operative
Femoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for Gait
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
Amount of translation and lift-off for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during gait activity.
3 months post-operative
Femoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for Ramp Down
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
Amount of translation and lift-off for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during ramp down activity.
3 months post-operative
Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Deep Knee Bend
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
Degree of axial rotation and weight-bearing range-of-motion for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during deep knee bend activity.
3 months post-operative
Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Gait
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
Degree of axial rotation and weight-bearing range-of-motion for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during gait activity.
3 months post-operative
Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Ramp Down
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
Degree of axial rotation and maximum weight-bearing range-of-motion for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during ramp down activity.
3 months post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Max Ground Reaction Force - Deep Knee Bend
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
Collected simultaneously with fluoroscopy data, ground reaction forces were obtained using a force plate (fixed to the ground) while subject performed activity. Maximum force measured in the vertical direction measured during the described activity, then normalized with respect to participant's body weight. As such, the data are presented as the percentage of the individuals' body weight that was supported on the implanted knee using a force plate (fixed to the ground) and has been termed "maximum reaction force."
3 months post-operative
Max Ground Reaction Force - Gait
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
Collected simultaneously with fluoroscopy data, ground reaction forces were obtained using a force plate (fixed to the ground) while subject performed activity. Maximum force measured in the vertical direction measured during the described activity, then normalized with respect to participant's body weight. As such, the data are presented as the percentage of the individuals' body weight that was supported on the implanted knee using a force plate (fixed to the ground) and has been termed "maximum reaction force."
3 months post-operative
Max Ground Reaction Force - Ramp Down
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
Collected simultaneously with fluoroscopy data, ground reaction forces were obtained using a force plate (fixed to the ground) while subject performed activity. Maximum force measured in the vertical direction measured during the described activity was normalized with respect to participant's body weight. As such, the data are presented as the percentage of the individuals' body weight that was supported on the implanted knee using a force plate (fixed to the ground) and has been termed "maximum reaction force."
3 months post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
DePuy Orthopaedics

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Adrija Sharma, Ph. D., University of Tennessee
  • Principal Investigator: William R Hamel, Ph. D., University of Tennessee

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 13002
  • R011373503 (Other Identifier: University of Tennessee)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings