An Efficacy and Safety Study of Sirukumab in Participants With Major Depressive Disorder

April 25, 2025 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Sirukumab as Adjunctive Treatment to a Monoaminergic Antidepressant in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of sirukumab as adjunctive treatment to antidepressant therapy (monoaminergic antidepressant) where sirukumab (administered as a 50 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection at Day 1, Day 28 and Day 56 during the 12- week double-blind treatment period) is compared to adjunctive placebo based on the change from baseline to 12-week endpoint in depressive symptoms as measured by the total score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), in participants diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have had a suboptimal response to the current standard oral antidepressant therapy and have a screening high sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) >=0.300 milligram per deciliters (mg/dL) (International System of Units (SI) 3.00 mg/L). A cohort of subjects with hsCRP <0.300 milligram per deciliter will also be enrolled to allow a better understanding of the relationship between CRP and clinical changes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of sirukumab as adjunctive treatment to a monoaminergic antidepressant in adults with major depressive disorder. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either placebo or sirukumab 50 milligram (mg) at a ratio of 1:1 at Day 1, 28 and 56. Participants will primarily be assessed for change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) score at Week 12. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
193

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • Ontario
      • Chatham, Ontario, Canada
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Poland
      • Belchatow, Poland
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland
      • Chelmno, Poland
      • Gorlice, Poland
      • Lublin, Poland
  • Russian Federation
      • Karelia, Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
      • Nizny Novgorod, Russian Federation
      • Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
      • Saratov, Russian Federation
      • Saratov Region, Russian Federation
      • St-Petersburg, Russian Federation
      • Tomsk, Russian Federation
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
  • United Kingdom
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
      • Oxford, United Kingdom
      • Redruth, United Kingdom
  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
    • California
      • Bellflower, California, United States
      • Glendale, California, United States
      • Lemon Grove, California, United States
      • Orange, California, United States
      • Santa Ana, California, United States
      • Torrance, California, United States
      • Wildomar, California, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Edgewood, Kentucky, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States
      • New York, New York, United States
      • Staten Island, New York, United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States
      • Plano, Texas, United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have a primary DSM-5 diagnosis of MDD
  • Must have a HDRS total score greater than or equal to (>=) 18 at screening and predose at Day 1, as recorded by the remote independent rater and must not demonstrate an improvement of > 25 percent (%) on their HDRS total score from the screening to baseline visit
  • Must be medically stable on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, clinical laboratory tests and 12-lead ECG performed at screening. If there are abnormalities, the participant may be included only if the investigator judges the abnormalities or deviations from normal to be not clinically significant. This determination must be recorded in the subject's source documents and initialed by the investigator
  • Participants with hypothyroidism who are on stable treatment for 3 months prior to screening are required to have thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) obtained. If the TSH value is out of range, but FT4 is normal, such cases should be discussed directly with the medical monitor before the subject is enrolled. If the FT4 value is out of range, the participant is not eligible

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other current Axis one psychiatric condition, including, but not limited to, MDD with current psychotic features, bipolar disorder (including lifetime diagnosis), obsessive-compulsive disorder, borderline personality disorder, eating disorder (eg, bulimia, anorexia nervosa), or schizophrenia (lifetime). The MINI will be used to screen for comorbid psychiatric diagnoses. As noted above, subjects with a diagnosis of comorbid GAD, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Persistent Depressive Disorder, ADHD, Social Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder with or without agoraphobia or Nicotine/Caffeine Dependence may be included, if the investigator considers MDD to be the primary diagnosis
  • A history of alcohol or substance use disorder (abuse/dependence) within 6 months prior to screening (nicotine and caffeine dependence are not exclusionary)
  • A current or recent (within the past year) history of clinically significant suicidal ideation (corresponding to a score of >= 3 for ideation) or any suicidal behavior within the past year, as validated on the C-SSRS at screening or baseline. Subjects with a prior suicide attempt of any sort, or history of prior serious suicidal ideation/plan should be carefully screened for current suicidal ideation and only included at the discretion of the investigator
  • More than 3 failed antidepressant treatments (of adequate dose and duration) in the current episode of depression (verified by the MGH-ATRQ)
  • Length of current major depressive episode > 60 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sirukumab 50 milligram (mg)
Participants will receive sirukumab 50 mg as subcutaneous injection on Day 1, 28 and 56.
Drug: Sirukumab 50 mg
Participants will receive sirukumab 50 mg as subcutaneous injection on Day 1, 28 and 56.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive matching placebo on Day 1, 28 and 56.
Drug: Placebo
Participants will receive matching placebo on Day 1, 28 and 56.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) Total Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
The HDRS-17 is a clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess the severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression with a score range of 0 to 52. Each of the 17 items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding the scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in HDRS-17 Total Score at Weeks 1, 4 and 8
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4 and 8
The HDRS-17 is a clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess the severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression with a score range of 0 to 52. Each of the 17 items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding the scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 4 and 8
Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS-17 Total Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Remission- Percentage of participants with HDRS-17 total score less than or equal to (<=) 7 were considered as remitters. HDRS-17 defined as clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression with score range of 0 to 52. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.
Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Response as Assessed by HDRS-17 Total Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Response- Percentage of participants with greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement on the HDRS-17 total score from baseline at Week 12 were considered as responders. The HDRS-17 defined as clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess the severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression with a score range of 0 to 52. Each of the 17 items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding the scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.
Week 12
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Total Score at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
CGI-S defined as clinician-rated scale that assesses the severity of mental illness on a scale of 0 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, a participant was assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to:1: normal, not at all ill; 2: borderline mentally ill; 3: mildly ill; 4: moderately ill; 5: markedly ill; 6: severely ill; 7: among the most extremely ill patients. A higher score implies a more severe condition.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Total Score at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
The PHQ-9 used as a participant-reported measure of depressive symptomatology. The PHQ-9 is 9-item scale, where each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=Not at all, 1=Several Days, 2=More than half the days, and 3=Nearly every day). The participant's item responses were summed to provide a total score range of 0 to 27. Higher scores indicates greater severity of depressive symptoms. The recall period is 2 weeks.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
Change From Baseline in Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Total Score (Definition 1) at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) is short, 14-item instrument to measure anhedonia. Each of the 14 items has a set of four response categories (Definition 1): Definitely Agree (=1), Agree (= 2), Disagree (= 3), and Definitely Disagree (= 4). A SHAPS total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 item scores with a total score range from 14 to 56. A higher total score indicates higher levels of state anhedonia.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
Change From Baseline in Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Total Score (Definition 2) at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) is short, 14-item instrument to measure anhedonia. Each of the 14 items has a set of four response categories (Definition 2): Definitely Agree (= 0), Agree (= 0), Disagree (= 1), and Definitely Disagree (= 1). A SHAPS total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 item scores with a score range from 0 to 14. A higher total score indicates higher levels of state anhedonia.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total Score at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22
The FACIT-Fatigue is a questionnaire that assesses self-reported tiredness, weakness, and difficulty conducting usual activities due to fatigue. The subscale consists 13-item instrument to measure fatigue. Each of the 13 items has a set of five response categories: Not at all (=0), A little bit (=1), Somewhat (=2), Quite a bit (=3) and Very much (=4). A total FACIT-Fatigue subscale score was calculated as the sum of the 13 item scores (reserved scores [4 - score] for all except for 2 items: "I have energy" and "I am able to do my usual activities"), and ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 22, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 22, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR107171
  • CNTO136MDD2001 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
  • 2014-005206-37 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder, Major

Clinical Trials on Sirukumab 50 mg

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings