Effectiveness of Therapeutic Alliance and Minimal Intervention for Chronic Low Back Pain (TalkBack)

February 11, 2021 updated by: Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo

Effectiveness of the Addition of Therapeutic Alliance to Minimal Intervention Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain With Low Risk of Psychosocial Factors: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of minimal intervention and therapeutic alliance in pain, specific and general disability, global perceived effect, empathy, credibility and expectation of improvement in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Low back pain remains a global public health problem. The classification of patients in low back pain subgroups aims to optimize the health system and provide the quantity and the type of proper technique for each patient. Several factors may influence physical therapy. The therapeutic alliance may be defined as harmony or social connection between the therapist and the patient and may influence the treatment effect. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the addition of the therapeutic alliance to a minimum intervention for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain with low risk of psychosocial factors.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
222

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 03071000
        • Physical Therapy Outpatient Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients waiting for treatment in the waiting list of physical therapy clinics
  • Diagnosis of chronic non-specific low back pain (over 12 weeks)
  • More than 18 years
  • Able to read and write the Portuguese language
  • Low risk of psychosocial factors (less than 3 points in the STarT Back Screening Tool).

Exclusion criteria

  • Spine surgery history
  • Nerve root compromise
  • Cognitive impairment related disorders
  • Pregnants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Positive Therapeutic Alliance
Intervention involving reassurance and information related to the return to daily activities, advice on dealing with the pain and clear explanation of signs and symptoms. The session will take 60 minutes and will be structured to increase the therapeutic alliance and empathy. Patients will be instructed to return in a week for further consultation to clarify doubts.
Behavioral: Positive Therapeutic Alliance
Intervention involving reassurance and information related to the return to daily activities, advice on dealing with the pain and clear explanation of signs and symptoms. The session will take 60 minutes and will be structured to increase the therapeutic alliance and empathy. Patients will be instructed to return in a week for further consultation to clarify doubts.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Information about low back pain based on Back Book. The therapy will be performed with limited interaction between patient and therapist and the information will be transmitted in a clear and direct way. The limited interaction between patient and therapist in this group will be established at the first session lasting 45-60 minutes. Patients will be instructed to return for a visit after a week to clarify questions.
Behavioral: Usual care
Information about low back pain based on Back Book. The therapy will be performed with limited interaction between patient and therapist and the information will be transmitted in a clear and direct way. The limited interaction between patient and therapist in this group will be established at the first session lasting 45-60 minutes. Patients will be instructed to return for a visit after a week to clarify questions.
Other: Control group
Patients will not receive intervention in the first mo nth of enrollment. After a year, the treatment offered to the Positive Therapeutic Alliance or Usual Care group will be available for patients who are interested.
Other: Control group
Patients will not receive intervention in the first month in which they are enrolled. After a year, the treatment offered to the Positive Therapeutic Alliance or Usual Care group will be available for patients who are interested.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: One month after randomization
Pain intensity will be measured by an 11-point Pain Numerical Rating Scale
One month after randomization
Specific disability
Time Frame: One month after randomization
Specific disability associated with low back pain will be measured by the 11-point Patient Specific Functional Scale.
One month after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Six and twelve months after randomization
Pain intensity will be measured by an 11-point Pain Numerical Rating Scale
Six and twelve months after randomization
Specific disability
Time Frame: Six and twelve months after randomization
Specific disability associated with low back pain will be measured by the 11-point Patient Specific Functional Scale.
Six and twelve months after randomization
Disability
Time Frame: One, six and twelve months after randomization
Disability associated with low back pain will be measured by the 0-100 scale of the Oswestry Disability Index
One, six and twelve months after randomization
Global impression of recovery
Time Frame: One, six and twelve months after randomization
Global impression of recovery will be measured by an 11-point Global Perceived Effect Scale
One, six and twelve months after randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Empathy
Time Frame: One week after the first session of treatment
Empathy will be measured by a 50-point scale of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) questionnaire
One week after the first session of treatment
Credibility
Time Frame: After the first session of treatment
The credibility regarding the treatment will be evaluated using 0-24 point scale.
After the first session of treatment
Expectation of improvement
Time Frame: One week after the first session of treatment
The expectation of improvement will be assessed with a numerical scale of 11 points
One week after the first session of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Felipe RC Fagundes, MsC, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 44720315.5.0000.5372

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings