Assessment of the Efficacy of POLYGYNAX® in the Empirical Treatment of Infectious Vaginitis (PRISM)

August 13, 2018 updated by: Laboratoire Innotech International

Assessment of the Efficacy of POLYGYNAX® in the Empirical Treatment of Infectious Vaginitis International, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study, Comparative Versus Miconazole

POLYGYNAX® is a broad spectrum combination of nystatin, neomycin and polymixin B indicated for the local treatment of vaginitis due to sensitive germs and treatment of non specific vaginitis of adults. POLYGYNAX® has been marketed in France since 1969.

Nevertheless, despite the well established use of POLYGYNAX®, there is no clinical study supporting the interest of the combination of antifungal and antibiotics agents versus antifungal agent alone.

The aim of this project is to demonstrate that POLYGYNAX® is more effective than miconazole in the treatment of women experiencing symptoms of infectious vaginitis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
661

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with an abnormal vaginal discharge associated with one (or more) functional vaginal complaints: vaginal burning and/or vaginal pain and/or vaginal irritation clinically evoking an infectious vaginitis:

    • bacterial vaginitis
    • non-specific vaginitis (atypical symptoms)
    • mixed vaginitis (i.e. suprainfected fungal vaginitis) and able to receive an empirical local treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recurrent patient; i.e. a patient who has had at least 4 episodes of infectious vaginitis in the 12 months prior to inclusion
  2. Vaginal infection justifying systemic therapy
  3. History of atrophic vaginitis or suspected atrophic vaginitis at inclusion
  4. Patient presenting with signs of genital herpes or signs of non-infectious vulvar pathology (vulvodynia, psoriasis, eczema, lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, contact dermatitis, candida intertrigo, vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN))
  5. Patient with current Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) and/or patients with clinical suspicion of STI
  6. Disease or concomitant treatment that could cause decreased immunity (i.e. diabetes mellitus, corticosteroids treatments)
  7. Systemic anti-infective treatment (antibiotic, antifungal) within two weeks prior to inclusion
  8. Patient menstruating or patient with menometrorrhagia due to hormonal imbalance at the time of inclusion
  9. Pregnant or lactating women or delivery within last 1 month

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: POLYGYNAX®
Name : POLYGYNAX® Active components : nystatin 100 000 IU + neomycin sulphate 35 000 IU + polymyxin B sulphate 35 000 IU Dosage : 1 capsule intravaginally per day (administered at bedtime lying down) 12 vaginal soft capsules
Drug: POLYGYNAX®
Active Comparator: miconazole + placebo
Name : GYNODAKTARIN® Active components : miconazole nitrate 400 mg Dosage : 1 capsule intravaginally per day (administered at bedtime, lying down) 3 vaginal soft capsules followed by 9 placebo vaginal soft capsules
Drug: Placebo
Drug: GYNODAKTARIN®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Treatment Efficacy Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Treatment Visit
Time Frame: 15 days after first treatment administration
  • Success is defined by resolution (return to patient's usual gynaecological conditions, i.e. before the episode which warranted inclusion in the study) OR substantial improvement of clinical signs of infectious vaginitis (i.e. abnormal vaginal discharge), and/or vaginal symptoms (vaginal burning and/or vaginal pain, and/or vaginal irritation).
  • Failure is defined by persistence or worsening of symptoms and clinical signs or requirement of an alternative or specific treatment.

Not considered as "Treatment Failure":

  • The need to initiate a specific treatment because of a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) (trichomoniasis; gonococcal and chlamydial infections) detected from the vaginal sample at Visit 1 / D1.
  • Patients presenting with only vulvar complaints not considered as related to infectious vaginitis.
15 days after first treatment administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the Diary
Time Frame: during 14 days after first treatment intake

This outcome was evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) completed by the patient.

The scale measured the level of each vaginal symptom experienced during the day (vaginal discharge, vaginal burning, vaginal pain and vaginal irritation).

Scale ranges = 0 to 100 0=none symptom 100=maximum intensity of symptom Time points used in the calculation= D1 to D14
during 14 days after first treatment intake
Number of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the Investigator
Time Frame: 15 days after first treatment administration

The vaginal discharge is assessed by the investigator by using a score:

0=absent

  1. mild: insufficient for speculum collection
  2. moderate: sufficient for speculum collection
  3. abundant: visible at the introitus even before speculum introduction.
15 days after first treatment administration
Clinical Treatment Efficacy (Success/Failure) Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Study Visit
Time Frame: 22 days after first treatment administration
Success and Failure (same definition as the primary outcome measure)
22 days after first treatment administration
Investigator's Global Satisfaction
Time Frame: 15 days after first administration

The investigator filled the satisfaction questionnaire during the end of treatment visit.

Six ratings are available: Very Bad, Bad, Somewhat Bad, Somewhat Good, Good and Very Good.
15 days after first administration
Patient's Global Satisfaction
Time Frame: 15 days after first administration

The patient filled the satisfaction questionnaire on her patient's diary at home the eve of the End of Treatment Visit.

Six ratings are available: Very Bad, Bad, Somewhat Bad, Somewhat Good, Good and Very Good.
15 days after first administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Laboratoire Innotech International

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
International Clinical Trials Association
Venn Life Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Marc BOHBOT, Dr, Institut Alfred Fournier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PGX 401-11
  • 2014-001759-22 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaginitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings