Treatment for Patients With Multiple Hepatocellular Carcinomas Based on the NDR Scoring System

March 30, 2016 updated by: ShenFeng, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Outcomes Between Hepatectomy and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Multiple Hepatocellular Carcinomas Based on the NDR Scoring System

The aim of this study is to establish a selection criteria of hepatectomy for patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas based on the NDR Scoring System

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) accounts for 60% to 70% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.However,the selection criteria of hepatectomy for patients with multiple HCCs remains controversial.Researches have suggested that part of the patients with multiple HCCs can also benefit from hepatectomy.But,expanding the selection criteria for hepatectomy will increase tumor recurrence rates and reduce the therapeutic effect, more stringent selection criteria will also make part of the patients who should take hepatectomy lose the operation chance. This is a difficult problem in the research of this field.The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system recommends that stage A (number ≤ 3, largest diameter ≤ 3 cm) were suitable for liver resection.However, increasing reports on good outcome after hepatectomy for patients with multiple HCCs have been published.Studies on clonal origin suggest that hepatectomy is a better treatment for multiple HCCs from multicentric origin (MO) than that from intrahepatic metastasis (IM) and the 5-year overall survival rates is 24% to 58%.The investigators established a scoring system(NDR score; N, tumor number; D, total tumor diameter; R, ratio of largest/smallest diameter) based on preoperative data which can accurately predict postoperative long-term survival of patients with multiple HCCs.The formula is as follows: 1×N（N: >3=1; ≤3= 0）+ 2×D（D: >8cm = 1; ≤8cm= 0）+ 1×R（R: >6 = 1; ≤6= 0）.The investigators first propose a selection criteria of hepatectomy for patients with multiple HCCs based on this scoring system. Patients with a NDR score 0-2 are recommended for hepatectomy and can benefit from the surgery,and because of the unsatisfied outcome,patients with a NDR score more than 2 are not recommended for hepatectomy.The stringent selection criteria should be expanded so that more patients can benefit from hepatectomy,and the less stringent criteria should be limited to ensure curative effect.So,the investigators' NDR scoring system was more accurate in selecting patients with multiple HCCs for hepatectomy and this article was published on Ann Surg Oncol（2015，22:826）.In order to further confirm the rationality of this selection criteria,the investigators would like to propose a prospective randomized controlled study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
320

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200438
        • Recruiting
        • Eastern hepatobilliary surgery hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female patients > 18 years and <=70 years of age
  2. Patients preoperatively diagnosed of hepatocellular carcinoma according to the criteria of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases(AASLD).
  3. Preoperative ECOG criteria score of 0-1
  4. Child-Pugh class A liver function
  5. Multiple hepatocellular carcinomas with tumor number <=5 and total tumor diameter <=15 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Major portal/hepatic vein invasion
  2. Extrahepatic metastasis
  3. Patients with apparent cardiac, pulmonary, cerebral and renal dysfunction,which may affect the treatment of liver cancer
  4. Anticancer treatment before surgery
  5. Lost to follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Hepatectomy with NDR 0-2
Surgical removal of all lesions for patients with a NDR score 0-2 according to the NDR scoring system
Procedure: Hepatectomy
Surgical removal of all lesions
Active Comparator: TACE with NDR 0-2
Transarterial chemoembolization for patients with a NDR score 0-2 according to the NDR scoring system
Procedure: TACE
Transarterial chemoembolization with lipiodol and pirarubicin
Experimental: Hepatectomy with NDR >2
Surgical removal of all lesions for patients with a NDR score more than 2 according to the NDR scoring system
Procedure: Hepatectomy
Surgical removal of all lesions
Active Comparator: TACE with NDR >2
Transarterial chemoembolization for patients with a NDR score more than 2 according to the NDR scoring system
Procedure: TACE
Transarterial chemoembolization with lipiodol and pirarubicin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to recurrence
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Shen Feng, MD, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EHBHKY2015-01-012

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings