Defining Circulating Micro-RNA Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis (miRNA-Sepsis)

March 11, 2019 updated by: Emergency, National University Hospital, Singapore

The objectives are to:

  1. derive and validate a panel of miRNAs that are consistently differentially expressed in the plasma of patients with and without sepsis
  2. investigate the prognostic and predictive values of the panel of miRNAs to guide treatment
  3. investigate the roles of these differentially-expressed circulating miRNAs in immune modulation during sepsis

The methodology involves sampling of blood from controls and subjects in the sepsis continuum at their earliest presentation in the emergency department longitudinally to hospitalization. The investigators will develop panels of miRNAs that are specific to early and late stages of sepsis, and correlate clinical, biochemical and microbiological outcomes with these miRNAs.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Prospective observational cohort of patients along the entire sepsis continuum in National University Hospital Emergency Department (ED) will be enrolled along with non-infective controls. Whole blood samples will be separated immediately into plasma and serum for storage at the Tissue Repository. Those who are subsequently admitted to the general ward, high dependency (HD) or intensive care unit (ICU) will have their 2nd and 3rd samples obtained at 24-48 hours and 48-72 hours respectively. The 2nd and 3rd samples will be used as prognostic markers (Objective #2). Patients who are discharged directly from the ED will be tracked for any clinical recurrence of their disease within 28 days to ensure the diagnostic accuracy of the first sample of biomarkers that are extracted.

Samples will be batch-processed via the circulating miRNA profiling workflow comprising of the pre-analytics, analytics, and data processing and analysis phases. This qPCR-based miRNA profiling has much smaller feature to sample ratio thus allowing a global sequential forward selection to optimally combine a host of features with complementary prediction strengths to form the biomarker panel which has the least number of components and the maximized classification power (ROC AUC). Panel robustness measurement using computational generated noises and validation with a larger set of blinded samples will be performed.

The final objective will be assessed by measuring the concentrations of secreted cytokines, chemokines and reactive oxygen species after synthesis and transfection the newly-derived miRNA panel into monocytes and monocytic cell lines.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Singapore
      • Singapore, Singapore, 119074
        • National University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This research project will be a prospective observational cohort study of controls without infection and patients along the entire sepsis continuum the Emergency Department (ED). Admitted patients will be followed-up in the inpatient units including the intensive care unit (ICU) and general wards. Healthy controls and those with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) but without evidence of infection will also be recruited to demonstrate differentiation of biomarkers for early diagnosis. The reference standards for infection and sepsis will be positive cultures (e.g. from blood, urine, endotracheal tube, sputum) and final discharge diagnoses.

Description

Inclusion criteria for controls:

  • Adults 21 years and above
  • Has condition unrelated to any infective cause

Exclusion criteria for controls:

  • Underlying chronic inflammatory condition (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease)
  • Underlying autoimmune disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus)
  • Pre-existent immunological disorder

Inclusion criteria for subjects:

  • Adults 21 years and above
  • Clinical/radiological suspicion or confirmation of infection

Exclusion criteria for subjects:

  • Age below 21 years
  • Prisoners
  • Known pregnancy
  • Do-not-attempt resuscitation status
  • Requirement for immediate surgery
  • Active chemotherapy
  • Hematological malignancy
  • Treating physician deems aggressive care unsuitable
  • Unable to provide informed consent or comply with study requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fold changes of miRNA expression
Time Frame: 3 years
Fold changes of differentially-expressed miRNA in log2 scale in comparison to the severity of sepsis (control vs. sepsis vs. septic shock) and adjudicated requirement for hospitalization (yes vs. no)
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MiRNA panel test performance metrics
Time Frame: 3 years
Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of capability of miRNA panel to distinguish different severity of sepsis (i.e. requirement for inpatient management) and against standard clinical parameters, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6, interleukin-8).
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National University Hospital, Singapore

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
A*Star
MiRXES Pte Ltd
National University of Singapore

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Win Sen Kuan, MBBS, National University Hospital, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 9, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TA/0029/2014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings