Dose Reduction of Etanercept in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

December 24, 2015 updated by: Zhixiang Huang

Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Dose Reduction in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of safety of etanercept dose reduction combined with sulfasalazine in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients who have achieved a significant clinical response.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This single-centre, open-labeled randomized study will evaluate the efficacy of safety of etanercept dose reduction combined with sulfasalazine in patients who achieved a significant clinical response. AS patients who meet the inclusion criteria will take celecoxib (0.4g/d) during the whole period of study. In the first period, all patients will be given etanercept 50 mg subcutaneous injections weekly from baseline to week12. In the second period, patients who satisfied the criteria for disease remission will be randomized to one of the following three treatment arms: (1) Dose reduction arm: Patients will receive etanercept 50 mg subcutaneous injections every other weeks plus sulfasalazine (2g/d) oral administration till week24. (2) Dose maintenance arm: Etanercept remains unchange from week12 to week24. (3) Etanercept discontinuation arm: Patients will be treated with sulfasalazine (2g/d) oral administration till week24. In the third period, all patients will take sulfasalazine (2g/d) till week 48. Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index (BASMI),Spondyloarthritis research consortium of Canada(SPARCC) score for the sacroiliac joint and adverse effect will be assessed in the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients 18 to 45 years of age.
  2. Proven AS according to the modified New York criteria
  3. Negative result of a pregnancy test in serum in screening visit and in urine in baseline visit, done in all women, except those surgically sterilized and those who have at least one year of menopause.
  4. Sexually active women of childbearing potential must agree and commit to use a medically accepted form of contraception.
  5. ASDAS score ≥2.1
  6. Ability to reconstitute the drug and self-inject it or have a person who can do so.
  7. Capability to understand and voluntarily give written informed consent that is signed and dated, before any specific procedure of the protocol is performed.
  8. Ability to store injectable test article at 2º to 8º C.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy/lactation.
  2. Previously exposure to murine or chimeric monoclonal antibodies.
  3. Receipt of any live (attenuated) vaccines within 4 weeks before screening visit.
  4. History of chronic or a recent serious infection.
  5. History of tuberculosis within the last 3 years.
  6. History of malignancy.
  7. Significant concurrent medical diseases including uncompensated congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within 12 months, stable or unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled hypertension, severe pulmonary disease, history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, central nervous system demyelinating events suggestive of multiple sclerosis.
  8. Presence or history of confirmed blood dyscrasias.
  9. History of any viral hepatitis within 1 year prior screening or history of any drug-induced liver injury at any time prior to screening.
  10. Laboratory exclusions are: hemoglobin level < 8.5 mg/dl white blood cell count < 3.5×10e9/l, platelet count < 125 ×10e9/l, creatinine level > 175 mcmol/l, liver enzymes > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal or alkaline phosphatase > 2 times the upper limit of normal.
  11. Participation in trials of other investigational medications within 30 days of entering the study.
  12. Clinical examination showing significant abnormalities of clinical relevance.
  13. Concomitant medication with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or corticosteroids.
  14. Hypersensitivity to any regent of study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Dose reduction arm
AS patients who achieved remission will receive etanercept 50 mg subcutaneous injections every other weeks plus sulfasalazine (2g/d) oral administration till week24. Celecoxib will be the background therapy.
Drug: etanercept (Half-Dose)
AS patients who satisfied the criteria for disease remission (ASDAS<1.3) will be randomized to one of the three treatment arms. In the dose reduction arm, patients will receive etanercept 50 mg subcutaneous injections every other weeks .
Other Names:
  • Enbrel
Drug: Sulfasalazine
AS patients who satisfied the criteria for disease remission (ASDAS<1.3) will take sulfasalazine (2g/d) from week12 to week48.
Other Names:
  • Sulazine
Drug: Celecoxib
Celecoxib (0.4g/d) will be the background therapy.
Other Names:
  • Celebrex
Active Comparator: Dose maintenance arm
AS patients who achieved remission will receive etanercept 50 mg subcutaneous injections every weeks plus sulfasalazine (2g/d) oral administration till week24. Celecoxib will be the background therapy.
Drug: Sulfasalazine
AS patients who satisfied the criteria for disease remission (ASDAS<1.3) will take sulfasalazine (2g/d) from week12 to week48.
Other Names:
  • Sulazine
Drug: Celecoxib
Celecoxib (0.4g/d) will be the background therapy.
Other Names:
  • Celebrex
Drug: etanercept (Full-Dose)
AS patients who satisfied the criteria for disease remission (ASDAS<1.3) will be randomized to one of the three treatment arms. In the dose maintenance arm, patients will receive etanercept 50 mg subcutaneous injections every weeks.
Other Names:
  • Enbrel
Other: Etanercept discontinuation arm
AS patients who achieved remission will take sulfasalazine (2g/d) till week24. Celecoxib will be the background therapy.
Drug: Sulfasalazine
AS patients who satisfied the criteria for disease remission (ASDAS<1.3) will take sulfasalazine (2g/d) from week12 to week48.
Other Names:
  • Sulazine
Drug: Celecoxib
Celecoxib (0.4g/d) will be the background therapy.
Other Names:
  • Celebrex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ASDAS from baseline to week48.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
ASDAS includes CRP (mg/L); Apart from the value of CRP, the four additional self-reported items (rated on 0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS]) included in this index are back pain, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling and patient global assessment of disease activity. The ASDAS scores are calculated as follows: ASDAS= (0.121×total back pain) + (0.110×subject global) + (0.073×peripheral pain/swelling) + (0.058×duration of morning stiffness) + (0.579×Ln(CRP+1)).
Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ESR from baseline to week48.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. This test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube and is measured in mm/h. Normal range is 0 to 30 mm/h. A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
Change in CRP from baseline to week48.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
CRP is a marker of inflammation and measured in mg/L. A higher level is consistent with inflammation.
Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
Change in BASFI from baseline to Week48.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS patients. Participants answered 10 questions, consisting of 8 specific questions regarding function in AS patients and 2 questions reflecting the participant's ability to cope with everyday life. Each question was answered on a 0-10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem), the sum of which (divided by 10) resulted in the BASFI score (0-10).
Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
Change in BASMI from baseline to Week48.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober's test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10.
Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
Change in SPARCC score for the sacroiliac joint from baseline to Week48.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
SPARCC score for the sacroiliac joint was based on 6 consecutive coronal slices from posterior to anterior. Each joint was divided into 4 quadrants. Each quadrant was assigned a score of 0 = no lesion/1 = increased signal. For each slice, the score is increased by 1 for each joint that exhibits an intense signal in any quadrant. Also, for each slice, an additional score of 1 will be given for each joint that includes a lesion demonstrating continuous increased signal of a depth ≥1 cm from the articular surface. The maximum possible score is 72.
Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
Percentage of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs) or adverse events (AEs) by co-morbidity from baseline to Week48.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study regents was considered an AE, without regard to possibility of relationship. An AE resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be a SAE: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Baseline, Week12, Week24, Week48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zhixiang Huang

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tianwang Li, MD, Guangdong No.2 Provincial People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 24, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015117183344589

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings