GAS-Hem Feasibility Study

March 15, 2021 updated by: Baxalta now part of Shire

A New Patient-centric Outcome Measure for Patients With Hemophilia: Testing the Feasibility of GAS-Hem in Pediatric, Adolescent and Adult Hemophilia A Patients

The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) as a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure to monitor clinical progress in participant-identified goal areas in individuals with hemophilia A.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Hemophilia A is an X-linked recessive, congenital bleeding disorder caused by deficient or defective coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The absence of FVIII leads to 'spontaneous' bleeding episodes (occurring primarily in joints, muscles and, less commonly, in soft tissues) and to excessive bleeding following trauma or injury. With proper treatment (FVIII) and self-care, most hemophilia patients can maintain an active, productive lifestyle. With a growing appreciation that a low bleed rate sometimes is only achieved, in part, by patients limiting their activities, there has been growing interest in understanding how hemophilia may still limit life despite absence of major bleeds. The current study will introduce and test a standardized method for individualized outcome measurement based on Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), a method that allows participants to set goals to address challenges that are meaningful to them and monitor attainment in those areas over time. The Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) is an online instrument for setting and tracking personalized goals related to hemophilia. The goal menu captures common challenges faced by people with hemophilia, accompanied by an inventory of descriptors that can be personalized. The tool can be used to track the health of individuals across a wide spectrum of ages, life experiences and health states. This is a 12-week, multicenter, prospective, observational, feasibility study of up to 60 people (aged 5 and 65) with moderate to severe hemophilia A to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of GAS-Hem as a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure to monitor clinical progress in participant-identified goal areas. Outcomes, including GAS-Hem (primary), health-related quality of life, bleeding episodes (location, cause, time) and treatment (time, dose and reason for infusion) will be assessed at screen/baseline, with follow-up at 6 and 12 weeks. Endpoints of interest include participant GAS-Hem outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks, participant quality of life (QoL) outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks, as well as participant and clinician perception of the GAS-Hem as a useful means of identifying and monitoring progress in relevant goal areas.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
        • St. Paul's Hospital
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 3G1
        • QEII Health Sciences Centre
  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61615
        • Bleeding and Clotting Disorders Institute
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A in the United States or Canada.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant has a documented diagnosis of hemophilia A
  2. Participant has documented clotting factor levels of 5% or less
  3. Participant is on a prescribed regimen of continuous prophylaxis. Continuous prophylaxis is defined by the World Federation of Hemophilia as "… the intent of treating for 52 weeks a year and receiving a minimum of an a priori defined frequency of infusions for at least 45 weeks (85%) of the year under consideration"
  4. Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol
  5. Participant is proficient in the English language to allow for use of the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) tool.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with an active Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibody (≥ 0.4 Bethesda units (BU) using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay or ≥ 0.6 BU using the Bethesda assay) at any time prior to screening
  2. Participant has been diagnosed with an inherited or acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia A (eg, qualitative platelet defect or von Willebrand's disease)
  3. Participant has participated in a clinical study involving a medicinal product or device within 30 days prior to enrollment or is scheduled to participate in a clinical study involving a medical product or device during the course of this study
  4. Participant is a family member or employee of the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Study participants
Participants with Hemophila A
Biological: Factor VIII
Licensed Factor VIII products. Study is brand agnostic
Other Names:
  • FVIII

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of the response to the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) outcomes tool
Time Frame: Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
The GAS-Hem is an online instrument for setting and tracking personalized goals related to hemophilia. The GAS-Hem uses a 5-point scale to record the degree of attainment in relation to individually defined goal areas between an established baseline (scaled as -1) and follow-up time points (here, 6 weeks and 12 weeks). The scale range is +2 (much better outcome) to -2 (much worse outcome), where 0 represents the desired outcome. The process includes a facilitator to ensure that the outcome descriptions for the scale levels are reasonably attainable (not too hard or too easy) and represent roughly equivalent change between levels (ie scores). The overall scoring formula results in a summary score of 50 when all goals are attained (individual goal attainment = 0). Scores >50 indicate generally better than expected outcomes in goal attainment. Scores <50 indicate that, overall, goals were not achieved. The overall total scores range is dependent on the average number of goals.
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Change from baseline of the measurement of the responsiveness (sensitivity to change) of GAS-Hem compared with the SF-36
Time Frame: Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Comparison of outcomes on the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) with the Medical Health Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) measures. The analysis will compare effect sizes calculated for the GAS-Hem and the SF-36 using Cohen's d and standardized response means.
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Change from baseline of the measurement of the responsiveness (sensitivity to change) of GAS-Hem compared with the PedQL
Time Frame: Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Comparison of outcomes on the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) measures. The analysis will compare effect sizes calculated for the GAS-Hem and the PedsQL using Cohen's d and standardized response means.
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of Quality of life (QoL) outcomes: Medical Health Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
The SF-36 is a 36 item survey of physical functioning, role limitations (both physical and emotional), bodily pain, general health vitality, social functioning and mental health administered to adults aged 19 and older. The instrument measure health related quality of life on a scale of 0 (lowest level) to 100 (highest level).
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Change from baseline of Quality of life (QoL) outcomes: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scale (PedsQL)
Time Frame: Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
The PedsQL is a 23 item survey that assesses physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and school functioning in children and adolescents aged 5 to 18. The PedsQL measures health related quality of life on a scale of 0 (lowest quality of life) to 100 (highest quality of life).
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Participant perception of the GAS-Hem as a useful means of identifying and monitoring change in relevant goal areas
Time Frame: Week 12
Measured using a questionnaire to test acceptability and usefulness of Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) to patients, and where applicable to their parents or guardians.
Week 12
Clinician perception of the GAS-Hem as a useful means of monitoring clinical progress in patient identified goal areas
Time Frame: Week 12
Measured using a questionnaire for clinicians designed to test their perception of the usefulness of Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) for monitoring clinical progress.
Week 12
Number and Location of Bleeds
Time Frame: Within six months prior starting study through week 12 in the study
History of bleeding episodes in the six months prior to signing informed consent will be collected. Participants will record details of each subsequent bleeding episode in the participant diary during the study.
Within six months prior starting study through week 12 in the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Baxalta now part of Shire

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 5, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 2, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 2, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 15, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 001501

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings