A Study Comparing Efficacy of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel/Carbidopa-Levodopa Enteral Suspension and Optimized Medical Treatment on Dyskinesia in Subjects With Advanced Parkinson's Disease (DYSCOVER) (DYSCOVER)

August 10, 2020 updated by: AbbVie

An Open-label, Randomized 12 Week Study Comparing Efficacy of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel/Carbidopa-Levodopa Enteral Suspension and Optimized Medical Treatment on Dyskinesia in Subjects With Advanced Parkinson's Disease DYSCOVER (DYSkinesia COmparative Interventional Trial on Duodopa VERsus Oral Medication)

The primary objective of this study was to examine the effect of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) compared with optimized medical treatment (OMT) on dyskinesia in participants with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a Phase 3b, open-label, randomized, multicenter, 12-week study. The study consisted of 3 sequential periods: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-Up. The OMT group had the same schedule of visits/procedures throughout the study as the LCIG treatment group, except for visits related to nasojejunal (NJ)/percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) procedures, titration of LCIG, and follow-up period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
63

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Finland
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00290
        • Helsinki Univ Central Hospital /ID# 151214
      • Oulu, Finland, 90220
        • Oulun yliopistollinen sairaala /ID# 150947
  • Greece
      • Glyfada, Greece, 16675
        • Mediterraneo Hospital /ID# 150955
      • Heraklion, Greece, 71110
        • University General Hospital of Heraklion "PA.G.N.I" /ID# 150956
      • Ioannina, Greece, 45500
        • University Hospital of Ioannin /ID# 150954
  • Hungary
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1085
        • Semmelweis Egyetem /ID# 170117
      • Szeged, Hungary, 6720
        • Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem /ID# 170115
    • Pecs
      • Pécs, Pecs, Hungary, 7624
        • Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem Klinikai Kozpont I. sz. Belgyogyaszati Klinika /ID# 170116
  • Italy
      • Florence, Italy, 50012
        • Azienda USL Toscana Centro /ID# 150770
      • Naples, Italy, 80138
        • Seconda Universita' di Napoli /ID# 150851
      • Rome, Italy, 00133
        • Policlinico Tor Vergata /ID# 151167
    • Lazio
      • Rome, Lazio, Italy, 00128
        • Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico /ID# 150846
    • Marche
      • Ancona, Marche, Italy, 60126
        • A.O. Univ. Ospedali Riuniti /ID# 150853
  • Slovakia
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 821 01
        • Univerzitna Nemocnica Bratislava /ID# 150144
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 821 01
        • Univerzitna Nemocnica Bratislava /ID# 150171
    • Kosicky Kraj
      • Košice - Západ, Kosicky Kraj, Slovakia, 041 66
        • Univerzitna nemocnica L. Pasteura /ID# 150146
    • Zilinsky Kraj
      • Martin, Zilinsky Kraj, Slovakia, 036 01
        • Univerzitna nemocnica Martin /ID# 150145
  • Spain
      • Barakaldo, Spain, 48903
        • Hospital Universitario Cruces /ID# 203807
      • Elche, Spain, 03202
        • Hospital General Univ de Elche /ID# 150154
      • Madrid, Spain, 28006
        • Hospital Univ de la Princesa /ID# 150157
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon /ID# 150155
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Univ Ramon y Cajal /ID# 150152
      • Madrid, Spain, 28702
        • Hospital Universitario Infanta /ID# 159696
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41009
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena /ID# 158861
      • Toledo, Spain, 45005
        • Hospital Virgen de la Salud /ID# 166297
    • Malaga
      • Málaga, Malaga, Spain, 29010
        • Hospital Regional Universitari /ID# 171485
  • United States
    • Florida
      • Port Charlotte, Florida, United States, 33980
        • Parkinson's Disease Treatment Center of Southwest Florida /ID# 150095
    • Texas
      • Round Rock, Texas, United States, 78681
        • Central Texas Neurology Consul /ID# 150088

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society (UKPDS) Brain Bank Criteria
  • Participants with advanced levodopa-responsive PD and persistent motor fluctuations who have not been controlled with optimized medical treatment (OMT: the maximum therapeutic effect obtained with pharmacological antiparkinsonian therapies when no further improvement is expected with regard to any additional manipulations of levodopa and/or other antiparkinsonian medication based on the Investigator's clinical judgment)
  • Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRs) Total score ≥ 30 at Visit 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant(s) treated with levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) previously
  • Participant's PD diagnosis is unclear or there is a suspicion that the subject has a parkinsonian syndrome such as secondary parkinsonism (e.g. caused by drugs, toxins, infectious agents, vascular disease, trauma, brain neoplasm), parkinson-plus syndrome (e.g. Multiple System Atrophy, Progressive supranuclear Palsy, Diffuse Lewy Body disease) or other neurodegenerative disease that might mimic the symptoms of PD
  • Participant(s) has undergone neurosurgery for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
  • Participant(s) has contraindications to levodopa (e.g. narrow angle glaucoma, malignant melanoma)
  • Participant(s) experiencing clinically significant sleep attacks or clinically significant impulsive behavior (e.g. pathological gambling, hypersexuality) at any point during the three months prior to the Screening evaluation as judged by the Principal Investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Optimized Medical Treatment (OMT)
Participants randomized to OMT continued their current anti Parkinson's disease (anti-PD) medication regimen for the duration of the study. All anti-PD medications and medications to treat dyskinesia must have remained stable for the duration of the study unless adjustments were medically indicated. The Investigator provided the prescription for continued OMT.
Drug: Optimized antiparkinsonian treatment
Dose levels of prescribed antiparkinsonian medications were individually optimized to their maximum therapeutic effect.
Experimental: Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)
The total daily dose of infusion LCIG was composed of three components: (i) the morning dose, (ii) continuous maintenance infusion dose and (iii) extra doses. A temporary nasojejunal (NJ) tube may have been used initially with the infusion pump to determine a participant's response to this method of treatment and to optimize the dose of LCIG before treatment with a permanent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy - with jejunal extension (PEG-J) tube was started. Following optional NJ and/or PEG-J placement and, at the investigator's discretion, the participant may have begun initiation and titration of LCIG infusion on Day 1 once tube placement was confirmed. The dose of LCIG was adjusted to obtain the optimal clinical response. The rate of LCIG infusion is typically within the range of 1 to 10 mL/hour (20 to 200 mg of levodopa/hour) in most instances and runs over a period of 16 consecutive hours each day.
Drug: Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)
Dose levels were individually optimized.
Other Names:
  • ABT-SLV187
  • DUOPA (carbidopa and levodopa Enteral Suspension)
  • DUODOPA
Device: CADD-Legacy ambulatory infusion pump
(manufactured by Smiths Medical)
Device: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube
(PEG tube)
Device: Jejunal extension tube
(J-tube)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
The Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) is a tool used to assess dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD) and contains both self-evaluation questions and items that are assessed directly by the physician to objectively rate the abnormal movements associated with PD. Part 1 contains 11 questions about the ON time dyskinesia and the impact of ON-dyskinesia on experiences of daily living. Part 2 contains 4 questions about OFF-dystonia rating. Part 3 contains 7 questions about objective evaluation of dyskinesia impairment and Part 4 contains 4 questions regarding dyskinesia disability. Each question is scored with respect to severity, which is rated on a scale where 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3= moderate and 4 = severe. The UDysRS total score is obtained by summing the item scores, ranging from 0 to 104. Higher scores are associated with more disability. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Baseline, Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in ON Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
The Parkinson's Disease (PD) Symptom Diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected study visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e., 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. ON time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug, and OFF time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Positive change from baseline for ON time without troublesome dyskinesia indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8) Summary Index
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8) is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure aspects of health that are relevant to participants with PD, and which may not be included in general health status questionnaires. The PDQ-8 is a self-administered questionnaire. Each item is scored on the following 5-point scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Occasionally, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always (or cannot do at all, if applicable). Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremors and stiffness. The results are presented as a summary index. The PDQ-8 summary index ranges from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Baseline, Week 12
Mean Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) score is a clinician's rating scale for assessing Global Improvement of Change. The CGI-C rates improvement by 7 categories: very much improved (1), much improved (2), minimally improved (3), no change (4), minimally worse (5), much worse (6), very much worse (7). The CGI-C score ranges from 1 to 7, with lower scores indicating improvement.
Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score (Activities of Daily Living)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part II score is the sum of the answers to the 13 questions related to Activities of Daily Living, and ranges from 0-52. Higher scores are associated with more disability. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OFF Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
The Parkinson's Disease (PD) Symptom Diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected study visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e., 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. ON time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug, and OFF time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Negative change from baseline for OFF time indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score (Motor Examination)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part III score is the sum of the 27 answers related to Motor Examination, and ranges from 0-108. Higher scores are associated with more disability. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Baseline, Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AbbVie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 9, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 19, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 19, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • M15-535
  • 2016-001403-23 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted at any time and the data will be accessible for 12 months, with possible extensions considered.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous, independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings