Gastric Preparation of Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy

July 26, 2016 updated by: Zhuan Liao, Changhai Hospital

Gastric Preparation of Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy: A Prospective, Single Blinded and Randomized Controlled Trial

By using three different Gastric Preparation of Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy, the investigators hope to find out the optimal gastric preparation plan.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

It is a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients who were conducted by Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy at Changhai Hospital will be randomly allocated into three different Gastric Preparation group before the procedure. It include clear water group which patient only drink 1000ml clear water before checking; simethicone group which patient drink 950ml clear water and 15ml simethicone before checking; simethicone combined with pronase group which patient drink 900ml lear water and 15ml simethicone and 20，000iu pronase before checking. The result were got from a relevant professional physician's blinded independent image-reading.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Shanghai, China
        • Recruiting
        • Changhai Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Shu-Guang Zhu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 16-75 years, who were scheduled to undergo a Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy, were eligible for this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dysphagia or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction, suspected or known intestinal stenosis, overt gastrointestinal bleeding, history of upper gastrointestinal surgery or abdominal surgery altering gastrointestinal anatomy, or postabdominal radiation;
  • Congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, under therapeutic anticoagulation, in poor general condition (American Society of Anesthesiologists class III/IV), claustrophobia, metallic parts, a pacemaker or other implanted electromedical devices, artificial heart valves;
  • Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy;
  • Exclusion criteria for standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination such as the presence of surgical metallic devices, even though its low magnetic field would technically not interfere with such devices;
  • Currently participating in another clinical study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: clear water group
the patients only drink 1000ml clear water before checking
Other: clear water
the patients just drink common clear water before Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy examination
Experimental: simethicone group
the patients drink 950ml clear water and 15ml simethicone before checking
Drug: simethicone
the patients drink clear water and simethicone (Espumisan; Berlin-Chemie, Germany, containing 40 mg simethicone in 1 mL emulsion) before Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy examination
Experimental: simethicone combined with pronase group
the patients drink 900ml clear water and 15ml simethicone and 20，000iu pronase before checking
Drug: simethicone combined with pronase
the patients drink simethicone (Espumisan; Berlin-Chemie, Germany, containing 40 mg simethicone in 1 mL emulsion)，pronase granules（Deyou；Beijing Tide Pharmaceutical Co，China,containing 20,000iu pronase），and clear water before Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy examination

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the level of gastric cleansing
Time Frame: 4 month
Two investigators who did not know which kind of gastric preparation of the patient scored the level of gastric cleansing 0f 120 participants according to a four-point grading scale: poor, fair, good, and excellent，which was pointed 3,2,1，and 0.The investigators should evaluate the gastric cleansing of six anatomical landmarks (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus).A poor level of cleansing indicated the mucosa was obscured largely by a lot of air bubbles and grume,fair indicated that a portion of the mucosa was obscured by air bubbles and grume that was enough to prevent a reliable visualization of polyps, good indicated that a small amount of air bubbles and grume，and excellent indicated that the fluid was clear and the image was either free or had only small bits of air bubbles and grume.
4 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transit time
Time Frame: 4 month
include gastric transit time，smal bowel transit time
4 month
Diagnostic yield of Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy
Time Frame: 4 month
The gastric focal lesion was defined as any of the positive findings including polyp, ulcers, submucosal tumor (SMT) and others (i.e. xanthoma, diverticulum, etc.). Erosion, gastritis and gastric atrophy were defined as negative findings, because they are diffuse lesions which can be easily diagnosed by Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy.
4 month
Tolerability of participants
Time Frame: 4 month
The endoscopist scored the tolerability of participants according to a three-point grading scale: poor, fair, and excellent，which was pointed 2,1，and 0.A poor tolerability of participants indicated patients with perforated severe abdominal pain,nausea, vomiting，etc.fair indicated patients with perforated little abdominal pain,nausea, vomiting.and excellent indicated that patients with no obvious discomfort.
4 month
the visibility of gastric
Time Frame: 4 month
Two investigators scored the level of gastric visibility 0f 120 participants according to a four-point grading scale: poor, fair, good, and excellent，which was pointed 3,2,1,and 0.The investigators should evaluate the visibility of gastric of six anatomical landmarks (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus).A poor level of cleansing indicated the less than 50% of mucosa could be seen,fair indicated that 50%-75% of the mucosa could be seen, good indicated that more than 75% of the mucosa could be seen，and excellent indicated the whole mucosa could be seen.
4 month
the time of gastric examination
Time Frame: 4 month
the time indicated since the first gastric mucosal image was observed to the endoscopist completed the whole gastric examination。
4 month
the added amount of water of the whole process during gastric examination
Time Frame: 4 month
4 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Changhai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20160410A

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings